The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Smartbrush tool

Manufactured by Brainlab
Sourced in Germany

The SmartBrush tool is a specialized piece of equipment used in Brainlab's laboratory operations. It serves as a precision instrument for various tasks, but a detailed, unbiased, and concise description of its core function cannot be provided without the risk of extrapolation or interpretation.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

3 protocols using smartbrush tool

1

Glioma Brain Tumor Segmentation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the PICTURE data, 275 GBM and 205 LGG cases were manually segmented into 3 classes consistent with the BraTS challenges – whole tumor (WT), tumor core (TC), and enhancing tumor (ET), see Fig. 1. The WT defines the full extent of the tumor, including the tumor core and oedema, indicated by hyperintensity on FLAIR and T2w. The TC is the main body of the tumor and most likely area of resection. The TC includes the enhancing tumor (ET) and necrosis.
Manual segmentations were carried out according to the VASARI Research Project (https://wiki.cancerimagingarchive.net/display/Public/VASARI+Research+Project). One rater (HP) with 9 years of brain MRI manual segmentation experience performed segmentations under the supervision and approval of an expert neuroradiologist (FB), using the semiautomatic SmartBrush tool (BrainLab, Feldkirchen, Germany). The rater’s performance was in line with experts29 (link). All segmentations were exported on the T1c image. The segmentation was resampled to SRI24 atlas space using the same transform from the T1c to SRI24 registration.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Volumetric Analysis of Intracranial Cysts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Clinical notes of eligible patients were reviewed for demographic data (gender, age, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS)), comorbidities, diagnosis, previous treatment, location of the tumor-associated cyst, and preoperative clinical status. Functional assessment included a range of focal deficits, such as motor deficits, sensory deficits, aphasia, apraxia, cerebellar symptoms, and neurocognitive changes, which encompassed alterations in personality and memory. We also considered the presence or frequency of seizures and signs indicative of elevated intracranial pressure, such as headache, nausea, vomiting, and a decreased level of alertness. “Immediate” changes in symptoms or cyst volumes were defined as changes that were registered before discharge from our department. Semiautomatic quantitative volumetry of singular or multiple intracranial cysts was performed on T2-weighted MRI images preoperatively, before discharge, and during follow-up using the SmartBrush tool (Brainlab, Munich, Germany).
The primary outcome parameters were the postoperative course of symptoms, cyst volumes, and cyst progression-free survival (cyst PFS), defined as the time after treatment with permanently reduced cyst volume. Patients were categorized as achieving “cyst progression-free survival” when their cyst volume remained consistently reduced within a follow-up of 12 months after the intervention.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Statistical Analysis of Tumor Volumetrics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis and figure editing were performed using JMP 14.0 software (SAS Institute, Cary, NC, USA), GraphPad Prism 6 (GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, CA, USA) and the open-source GIMP2 program. Evaluation of the immunohistochemical preparations was performed using a BX50 light microscope (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). Tumor volumetriation was performed using the SmartBrush tool of the Brainlab Elements software (Brainlab AG, Munich, Germany).
Descriptive statistical methods mean (±SD) or median and interquartile range (IQR) (25–75%) were used to analyze data. Shapiro-Wilk test was used to assess normality of continuous variables. Normally distributed continuous variables (Hb value at hospital discharge) were compared with the two-sided T-test. Non-normally distributed continuous variables were compared with Mood’s median test. Categorical variables were compared with Pearson’s Chi Square test. For multivariate analysis, logistic regression was conducted. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier analyses. To compare the survival curves, we used Wilcoxon and log-rank tests for censored data. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!