The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

3 protocols using muc6 clh5

1

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Gastrointestinal Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry of MUC2, MUC5AC, MUC6, CDX2, Ki67, p53 and β-catenin was performed as previously described4 (link), 8 (link). The following antibodies were used: p53 (DO-7 + BP53-12; 1:2,000; Thermo scientific, PA, USA), β-catenin (Clone 14; 1:5,000 BD Transduction Laboratories, CA, USA), MUC2 (Ccp58; 1:500; Novocastra, Newcastle, UK), MUC5AC (CLH2; 1:100; Novocastra, Newcastle, UK), MUC6 (CLH5; 1:50; Novocastra, Newcastle, UK), CDX-2 (Clone EPR2764Y, Immunologic, Duiven, The Netherlands) Ki 67 (MIB-1; 1:100; Immunotech Marseille, France)
In brief, 4μm sections were deparaffinized in xylene and endogenous peroxidase was blocked in 0.3% H2O2 (Merck, NJ, USA) in methanol. Antigen retrieval was performed by cooking for 20 minutes in 10/mM Tris/EDTA buffer. A blocking step was performed with 5% normal goat serum in PBS for 10 minutes. Next, the primary antibody was incubated for 1 hour at room temperature (p53) or overnight at 4°C (MUC2, MUC5AC, MUC6, CDX2, Ki67, and β-catenin). Staining of the antibodies was done with the Poly-HRP-Goat α Mouse/Rabbit IgG (Immunologic, Duiven, The Netherlands) and 3,3-diamino-benzidine (DAB, Sigma Aldrich, MO, USA). Sections were lightly counterstained with hematoxylin.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Histochemical and Immunohistochemical Staining

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Alcian blue (pH 2.5)/Periodic Acid-Schiff (AB/PAS) histochemical staining was performed using standard methods, to highlight intracellular mucin and to distinguish neutral (magenta) from acidic (blue) mucin by light microscopy.
The following primary antibodies were used for immunohistochemistry: CK7 (OV-TL-12/30, Dako, 1:1600), CK20 (KS20.8; Dako, 1:800), PAX8 (BC12; Cell Signaling, 1:50), CDX2 (CDX2-88; Biogenex, 1:100), ER (SP1; Ventana, pre-diluted), PR (1E2; Ventana, pre-diluted), MUC6 (CLH5; Novocastra, 1:100), CD10 (56C6; Vector, 1:50), WT1 (WT49; Leica, pre-diluted), ARID1A (HPA005456; Sigma, 1:400, 30'). All immunohistochemical stains were performed on the BOND RX platform (Leica), using the standard protocol, with BOND Epitope Retrieval Solution ER2 (Leica) for 30 minutes, incubation of primary antibody for 30 minutes at room temperature and BOND Polymer Refine Detection (Leica).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Analysis of MUC6, αGlcNAc, and Ki-67

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Expression of MUC6, αGlcNAc, and Ki-67 antigen was evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Three-μm thick consecutive sections were deparaffinized and hydrated through a graded alcohol series. With the exception of samples immunostained for αGlcNAc, after inhibition of endogenous peroxidase by treatment with a 3% H 2 O 2 /methanol solution, antigen retrieval was carried out in 10mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH8.0) containing 1mM EDTA in a microwave oven for 30 min. Following washing in phosphate-buffered solution, sections were incubated with the following primary antibodies: MUC6 (CLH5, diluted 1:200; Novocastra, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK), αGlcNAc (HIK1083, diluted 1:30; Kanto Chemical, Tokyo, Japan), and Ki-67 (MIB-1, diluted 1:200; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). Sections were then incubated with the secondary antibody anti-mouse IgG conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (Histofine, Simple Stain MAX-PO (M), Nichirei Biosciences, Tokyo, Japan) and developed using 3,3'-diaminobenzidine tetrachloride as a chromogen. Haematoxylin served as a nuclear counterstain. Negative controls were carried out omitting the primary antibodies, and no specific staining was seen.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!