The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

7 protocols using puriflash 450

1

Anhydrous Schlenk Techniques for NMR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Reagents were purchased from commercial
suppliers and used without purification. Unless otherwise stated,
the solvents used were anhydrous: specifically, chlorobenzene anhydrous
99.8% (Sigma-Aldrich Sure/Seal, <0.005% water) and 1,4-dioxane
extra dry 99.8% (Acros Organics AcroSeal, <0.005% water). Reactions
were performed under an argon atmosphere using vacuum-lines and Schlenk
techniques. 1H (500 MHz), 13C (126 MHz), 19F (470 MHz) NMR were recorded on Bruker AVANCE III instruments
in CDCl3 solutions. Chemical shifts are reported in ppm
relative to CDCl3 (1H: 7.26 and 13C: 77.16), and coupling constants J are given in
Hz. GC-MS experiments were performed with a Trace GC Ultra equipped
with a mass-selective detector, and high-resolution mass spectra (HRMS)
were obtained on a Thermo LTQ-Orbitrap XL with ESI source. Flash chromatography
was performed on silica gel (230–400 mesh) or with PuriFlash
450 from Interchim. Elemental analysis experiments were performed
on Thermo Electron Flash EA 1112 Series.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterization of Organometallic Complexes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All preparations have been carried out under argon, unless otherwise stated. All solvents were treated in a PS-400-6 Innovative Technologies Solvent Purification System (SPS). Infrared spectra were recorded on PerkinElmer Spectrum-100 (ATR mode) FT-IR spectrometer. CD spectra were determined in MeOH (ca. 4 × 10−4 mol L−1 solutions) in a 1 cm path length cell by using a Jasco-810 apparatus. Carbon, hydrogen and nitrogen analyses were performed using a PerkinElmer 240 B microanalyzer. 1H, 13C and 31P spectra were recorded on a Bruker AV-300 (300.13 MHz), a Bruker AV-400 (400.16 MHz) or a Bruker AV500 (500.13 MHz) spectrometers. Chemical shifts are expressed in ppm upfield from SiMe4, 85% H3PO4 (31P) or CFCl3 (19F). COSY, NOESY, HSQC, HMQC, and HMBC 1H–X (X = 1H, 13C, 31P) correlation spectra were obtained using standard procedures. Flash chromatography was performed on an Interchim (PuriFlash 450) instrument using a PF-50SIHP column (25 g, 30 μm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Synthesis of 6-Fluoro-3,3-dimethoxyindolin-2-one

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To a flame-dried 100 mL round bottomed flask equipped with a reflux condenser under an atmosphere of N2 was added 6-fluoroisatin (1.0 g, 6.06 mmol), trimethylorthoformate (729 µL, 6.66 mmol), and methanol (30 mL). p-Toluenesulfonic acid monohydrate (172.8 mg, 0.908 mmol) was added and the reaction was heated to reflux for 5.5 h. After cooling to ambient temperature, the reaction was diluted with diethyl ether and neutralized with a saturated solution of sodium bicarbonate. The organic layer was separated, and the aqueous layer was extracted twice with diethyl ether. The combined organics were dried over sodium sulfate, filtered, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The residue was taken up in diethyl ether, filtered over a pad of celite/Na2SO4, and concentrated to give a yellow solid. The crude yellow solid was purified flash column chromatography (SiO2, gradient elution 1 → 7% methanol/dichloromethane, Interchim PuriFlash 450) to give product 6-fluoro-3,3-dimethoxyindolin-2-one (1.06 g; 82.8% yield). LCMS m/z [M-OMe]+ 180. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CD3COCD3) δ 9.57 (br s, 1H), 7.44 (dd, J = 8.21, 5.47, 1H), 6.79 (m, 1H), 6.72 (dd, J = 8.99, 2.34, 1H), 3.48 (s, 6H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CD3COCD3) δ 173.1, 166.4, 164.5, 145.0, 144.9, 128.3, 109.3, 109.1, 100.1, 99.9, 51.2. HRMS [M+Na]+ calcd. for C10H10FNO3Na 234.0545, found 234.0542.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Purification and NMR Analysis of Compound

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The liquid extract was first purified by flash column chromatography in hydrophilic interaction (HILIC) mode with the following parameters. A Puriflash 450 (Interchim) system with a Silica HP-50-F0012 (14 g, 2 cm × 8 cm, 50 μm) flash cartridge (flow rate = 15 mL/min) was used. The mobile phases (gradient) were acetonitrile (solvent A), and water (solvent B). Time programs were 0–3 column volume (CV) for 10–20%B, 3–5 CV for 20–30%B, 5–7 CV for 30–40%B, 7–10 CV for 40%B. All fractions were collected by an automated fractions collector and analyzed by TLC. The fractions showing an Rf value of 0.36 (8:2 acetonitrile:water, purple spot with p-anisaldehyde staining reagent) according to TLC analysis were combined and the solvents removed by rotary evaporation at 45 °C (using acetonitrile as a co-solvent). The residue was dissolved in D2O and then analyzed by 1H NMR (256 scans; JEOL JNM-ECZ500R/S1 operating at 500 MHz for 1H).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Isolation and Characterization of HT-2-glucoside

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The solvent of the pooled crude extracts was evaporated, followed by lyophilization of the samples. The dried powder (≈250 mg) was mixed with 15 g of Celit® 545 (Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) and dried under forced air at atmospheric pressure. Then, the whole sample was applied to a reversed-phase silica gel vacuum flash chromatograph (Interchim, puriFlash®450, Montluçon, France), using two superimposed Interchim puriFlash® 32 g silica C18-IR-50C18-F0025 flash columns (particle size: 50 µm). The columns were eluted with a two-solvent gradient (solvent A: H2O, solvent B: ACN). The starting linear gradient from 10% B to 100% B in 45 min at a flow rate of 15 mL/min was followed by an isocratic gradient of B at 100% B for a further 20 min. The UV 254 nm and UV scan 200–400 nm modes were used for the detection and final separation of 11 main peak fractions (F1-F11, Table 1), which were consequently sampled (100 µL aliquots) and diluted at a ratio of 1:50 for LC-MS/MS analysis. The target compound, HT-2-glucoside, was found in fraction F4 by eluting at 20–24 min (61 mL with yield ≈ 500 µg of HT-2-glucoside, with traces of HT-2 toxin and T-2 toxin, 5.8 µg and 0.6 µg, respectively (Table 1)). The dried fraction F4 was then investigated by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (NMR) for the presence of alpha- or beta-configurated HT-2-glucoside.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Purification and Identification of Bioactive Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The fraction with the highest anti-allergic activity (F3: EtOH/EtOAc) was further purified to obtain major chemical components for structural identification and activity validation. One gram of the F3: EtOH/EtOAc fraction was purified by using medium-pressure liquid chromatography (MPLC; PuriFlash 450, Interchim, France) over reversed phase silica gel (PF-15C18AQ-F0080) and eluted with 3%-97% MeOH/H2O. The resulting fractions were examined by thin layer chromatography (TLC). The fractions containing identical compounds were combined and concentrated under vacuum. The NMR spectra of the isolated compounds were recorded on a Bruker Avance NMR spectrometer operating at 300 MHz for 1H and 75 MHz for 13C. High-resolution mass spectra were obtained using ESI on an Orbitrap Fusion Tribrid mass spectrometer (Thermo, Massachusetts, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Spectroscopic and Chromatographic Analysis of Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Optical rotation values were determined on a JASCO P-1010 polarimeter (Jasco, Tokyo, Japan). UV spectra were recorded on a PerkinElmer Lambda 365 UV-Vis spectrophotometer (PerkinElmer, Hopkinton, MA, USA). High-resolution electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (HR-ESI-MS) data were measured on a Waters ACQUITY UPLC H-Class Q-TOF LC-MS spectrometer (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis was carried out on an ACQUITY UPLC H-Class System (quaternary solvent manager, sample manager, PDA detector, and ELS detector) using a YMC ODS (4.6 × 250 mm, 5 µm, 1 mL/min) column. MPLC was performed on a PuriFlash450 (Interchim, Los Angeles, CA, USA) with a Flash C18 cartridge (50 µm, 40 g, YMC, Kyoto, Japan). Semipreparative HPLC was performed on a Waters 2535 Quaternary gradient module with a FlexInject, 2489 UV–VIS detector and Fraction Collector Ⅲ (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). The NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance 400 MHz spectrometer using tetramethylsilane as the internal standard (Bruker, Ettlingen, Germany). Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) analyses were performed on glass precoated with silica gel GF254 glass plates. All reagents for the analysis were purchased from Xilong Scientific Co., Ltd. (Guangdong, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!