The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

5 protocols using c apochromat water immersion objective na 1

1

Immunofluorescence Analysis of Ovarian Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Human ovarian cortical tissue was cut in 5 μm sections and mounted on glass slides. Dehydration and antigen retrieval was performed as described elsewhere (Stubbs et al., 2005 (link)) followed by serum block (30 min), then the primary antibody; (1/200) anti-TAFII68 Rabbit pAb (Bethyl Laboratories, #IHC-00094), (1/500) anti-FUS Rabbit pAb (Bethyl Laboratories, #A300-302A), or (1/200) anti-EWS Rabbit pAb (Bethyl Laboratories, #IHC-00086) overnight at 4°C. The sections were then incubated in a 1:700 dilution of secondary antibody (Donkey-anti-Rabbit) conjugated with Alexa Fluor 488 Dye (Life Technologies). Finally, sections were incubated in 1/7500 Hoechst (Life Technologies) followed by mounting with Dako Fluorescent Mounting Medium (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, U.S.A.) and analyzed using a LSM510 laser-scanning confocal microscope using a 63x C-Apochromat water immersion objective NA 1.2 (Carl Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany) and ZEN 2011 software (Carl Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative Immunofluorescence Analysis of IGF2 in Ovarian Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ovarian cortical tissue was sectioned in 5 μm slides and mounted on glass slides. Dehydration and antigen retrieval was performed as described elsewhere (Stubbs et al., 2005 (link)) followed by serum block (30 min), then primary antibody; anti-IGF2 rabbit polyclonal antibody (ab9574, Abcam, Cambridge, U.K.), (5 μg/ml) overnight at 4°C. This antibody was previously used and validated (Huang et al., 2010 (link)) and several other applications (ab9574-references.html">http://www.abcam.com/igf2-antibody-ab9574-references.html). The sections were subsequently incubated in a 1:250 dilution of appropriate secondary antibody (donkey-anti-rabbit for IGF2) conjugated with Alexa Fluor 488 Dye (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, U.S.A.). Sections were incubated in 1/3,500 Hoechst (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, U.S.A.) followed by mounting with Dako Fluorescent Mounting Medium (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, U.S.A) and analyzed using a LSM510 laser-scanning confocal microscope using a 63x C-Apochromat water immersion objective NA 1.2 (Carl Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany). Zen 2011 software (Carl Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany) was used for analysis and image capturing. The quantification of IGF2 immunofluorescence was done by as ImageJ (Jensen, 2013 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunofluorescence Labeling of Cryosections

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cryo sections (15 μm thickness) were blocked in 5% donkey serum PBS/Triton X-100 0.25% for 1 hour at RT. Primary antibodies (anti α1 (1:400) (a6f-c, Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank); anti α3 (1:300) (06172, EMD Millipore, US); anti calbindin (1:400) (ab82812, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) were applied in 1% donkey serum PBS/Triton X-100 0.25% overnight at 4°C. Secondary labelling was done with Alexa Fluor fluorescent-conjugated secondary antibodies (Alexa Fluor 488 donkey anti rabbit (A21206, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA); Alexa Fluor 568 donkey anti mouse (A10037, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) (1:350) in 1% donkey serum PBS/Triton X-100 0.25% for 1 hour at RT. Hoechst (1:10000) (Life technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) in PBS was used to counterstain the nuclei. Sections were mounted using fluorescence mounting medium (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) and analysed on a LSM510 laser-scanning confocal microscope using a 40x C-Apochromat water immersion objective NA 1.2 (Carl Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany). Zen 2011 software (Carl Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany) was used for analysis and image capturing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying GFP Fluorescence in Arabidopsis Roots

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the study of pH effects on GFP fluorescence, GFP fluorescence from root epidermal cells of one-week-old Arabidopsis seedlings (grown on 1/2 MS medium with pH adjusted to either 5.5 or 8.1 using MES or HEPES, respectively) was imaged and quantified as described (Sheahan et al. 2004 (link)) but without optical sectioning. GFP fluorescence was imaged with a confocal laser-scanning microscope (LSM 510; Zeiss) equipped with a 40X C-Apochromat water-immersion objective (NA 1.2; Zeiss) using a 488 nm Argon laser and BP500-530IR filter. GFP fluorescence intensity was quantified from mid-plane cell sections of a minimum of 200 cells. Fluorescence values were normalized to account for an observed pH-dependent change in autofluorescence of Col-0 seedlings captured with the applied image acquisition settings. Normalization was therefore performed by subtracting the ratio of fluorescence intensities in Col-0 plants at pH 8.1 and pH 5.5 from the same ratio in GFP-AGG3 or AGG3-GFP plants and then multiplying this value by the fluorescence intensity at pH 5.5.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Acceptor Photobleaching FRET Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We carried out acceptor photobleaching FRET with β-estradiol induced (described above) SZY1954 (wild type) using a LSM-780 (Zeiss) microscope, with a 40x C-Apochromat water-immersion objective (NA 1.2) in photon-counting channel mode. For vps1Δ cells (SZY2570), we used a Perkin Elmer Ultraview Vox spinning-disc microscope with a Hamamatsu EMCCD (C9100-23B) with 488 and 561 nm excitation. For both samples, we photobleached the acceptor (mCherry) with 561 nm excitation (for bleaching images, see Figure 2—figure supplement 1F for wild type and Figure 5—figure supplement 5A for vps1Δ). We analyzed 22 wild-type and 76 vps1Δ cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!