The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Vario el analyzer

Manufactured by Elementar
Sourced in Germany, United States

The Vario EL analyzer is a laboratory instrument designed for the determination of carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, and sulfur in solid and liquid samples. It utilizes an automated combustion process to analyze the elemental composition of a wide range of materials.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

12 protocols using vario el analyzer

1

Elemental Analysis of Plant Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Based on the method described by Koch et al. [32 (link)], the concentrations of P, potassium (K), Ca, Mg, sulfur (S), Fe, Mn, and Zn were determined in young leaves, old leaves, stem, and roots. About 3.5–4 mg of each sample was also weighed in a 5 × 9 mm tin capsule (IVA Analysentechnik, Meerbusch, Germany) and analyzed for N and C concentration against acetanilide standard by a using dry combustion method in a Vario EL analyzer (Elementar, Langenselbold, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Analytical Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded at a Bruker advance III 400-MHz NMR instrument. HRMS spectra were obtained on a Thermo Scientific Orbitrap Q Exactive ion trap mass spectrometer and QTOF-MS (Bruker Daltonics, times TOF). UV–vis spectra were determined on a Thermo Scientific GENESYS 50 UV–visible spectrophotometer. Elemental analyses were performed at an Elementar Vario EL analyzer. Dynamic light-scattering experiments were performed with a Brookhaven Elite Sizer zata-potential and a particle-size analyzer. Photoluminescence quantum yields were determined using a FLS 980 (Edinburgh instruments) absolute photoluminescence quantum yield measurement system and integrating sphere as a sample chamber. The steady-state fluorescence of solid samples was measured with FLS 920 fluorescence spectrometer (Edinburgh instruments).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization of Organic Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Melting points (M.P.) were measured on a Gallenkamp melting point apparatus in open glass capillaries and are uncorrected. IR spectra were measured as KBr pellets on a Perking Elmer FT 1000 spectrophotometer (Madison, WI, USA). The NMR spectra were recorded on a Varian Mercury Jeol-400 NMR spectrometer (Tokyo, Japan). 1H-NMR (400 MHz) and 13C-NMR (100 MHz) were run in (DMSO-d6). Chemical shifts (δ) are referred in ppm and coupling constants J are given in Hz. Mass spectra were recorded on a Shimadzu GCMS-QP 1000 EX mass spectrometer (Tokyo, Japan) at 70 eV. Elemental analysis was carried out on an Elementar Vario EL analyzer (Vernon Hills, IL, USA). Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds 110 are available from the authors.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Particulate Fluxes in Microcosms

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Particulate material fluxes were measured by weighing freeze-dried samples five times. The weight percentage of total carbon (% TC) in the exported material was measured with an Elementar Vario El analyzer on aliquots (15 mg) of freeze-dried sediment trap samples. A second aliquot (~ 20 mg) was acid digested (HNO3/HF at 150°C) [43 ] before analysis by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES). Assuming that particulate inorganic carbon (PIC) was mainly associated to calcium carbonate (CaCO3), the measurement of calcium (% Ca) by ICP-AES allowed calculating the % of PIC (% Ca x 12/40, with 12 and 40 corresponding to molar masses of carbon (C) and calcium (Ca), respectively). The weigh percentage of POC (% POC) was then determined by subtracting % PIC from % TC. Results are expressed in mmol POC collected in each sediment trap. POC fluxes were then calculated considering the surface of the minicosms (0.36 m2) and daily fluxes were calculated considering the duration of the experiments (6 days). Using aluminum (Al) concentrations as a proxy for dust concentrations (Al = 4.12 ± 0.39% in the dust analog), the measurement of Al content (%) in the exported material by ICP-AES allowed to estimate the percentage of lithogenic particles recovered in the sediment trap and the fluxes of lithogenic particles over the course of the experiments.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Characterization of 4-pyC2H3 Polymer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Reagents were commercially available and used without further purification except otherwise stated. The monomer 4-pyC2H3 was distilled to remove polymerization inhibitor hydroquinone before use. ESI-MS was obtained using a Shimadzu LCMS-2010A mass spectrometer, for which samples were digested by sonication in a mixture of hydrochloric acid and MeOH after removal of the residual monomers by sublimation under vacuum. Elemental analyses (EA) were conducted using an Elementar Vario EL analyzer using guest-free samples (with a little water adsorbed from air). IR spectra were recorded on a Bruker TENSOR 27 FT-IR spectrometer in the 400–4,000 cm−1 region with KBr pellets. 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker AVANCE III 400 MHz NMR spectrometer. Chemical shifts were quoted in p.p.m. referenced to the appropriate solvent peak or 0.0 p.p.m. for tetramethylsilicane. PXRD patterns were collected on a Bruker D8-Advance diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation and a LynxEye detector. Thermogravimetry analyses were performed on a TA Q50 system under N2 at a heating rate of 5 °C min. N2 sorption isotherms were measured by a Micromeritics ASAP 2020M physisorption analyzer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Comprehensive Analytical Characterization of Synthesized Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The elemental analysis (C H N) was performed using an Elementar Vario EL analyzer. Fourier transform IR spectra were measured on a Perkin–Elmer Spectrum One spectrometer with samples prepared as KBr discs. UV–Vis absorption spectroscopy of synthesized samples was carried out by Varian Cary 500 Scan UV–VIS NIR Spectrophotometer. Solution NMR spectra were recorded with Bruker Avance instruments operating at 1H Larmor frequencies of 400 MHz, using DMSO‑d6 as solvent and TMS as an internal standard for 13C and 1H nuclei.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

1,4-Benzenedi(1H-1,2,3-triazole) Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All reagents were commercially available and used without further purification. 1,4-Benzenedi(1H-1,2,3-triazole (H2bdt) was synthesized according to the method in the literature. Elemental analyses (EA) were conducted using an Elementar Vario EL analyzer. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements were performed with a VG Scientific ESCALAB 250 instrument. Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns were collected on a Bruker D8-Advance diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation and a LynxEye detector. Variable-temperature PXRD data were collected on a Rigaku SmartLab X-ray diffractometer (Cu-Kα, λ = 1.54056 Å). Thermogravimetric (TG) analyses were performed on a TA Q50 thermogravimetric analyzer under nitrogen gas at a heating rate of 10 °C min–1. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images were obtained from an ultra-high-resolution electron microscope (FE-SEM, SU8010). Gas sorption isotherms were measured on a Micromeritics ASAP 2020M instrument. Before the sorption experiments, the as-synthesized samples were first solvent exchanged with MeOH, and then activated for 12 h at 150 °C under vacuum. N2 (99.999%) was used for all measurements. The temperature was controlled by a liquid nitrogen bath (77 K).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Synthesis and Characterization of Organometallic Complexes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All reactions were carried out using standard Schlenk and vacuum-line techniques under an atmosphere of argon. While tetrahydrofuran (THF) and Et2O were distilled under Ar from sodium/benzophenone ketyl, CH2Cl2 was distilled from CaH2. t-BuONa, (η5-C5H5)2Ni, HBF4·Et2O (50–55% w/w in Et2O), anhydrous FeCl2 and other chemicals were commercially available and used as received. RN[CH2S(O)CMe]2 (R = Ph,56 (link) 4-ClC6H4,57 (link) CO2CH2Ph,58 (link) (dppv)Fe(CO)2Cl2 (dppv = 1,2-bis(diphenylphosphino)ethene)35 (link) and (dppe)Fe(CO)2Cl2 (dppe = 1,2-bis(diphenylphosphino)ethane)36 ) were prepared according to the published procedures. While 1H, 13C{1H}, and 31P{1H} NMR spectra were obtained on a Bruker Avance 400 NMR spectrometer, IR spectra were recorded on a Bio-Rad FTS 135 infrared spectrophotometer. Elemental analyses were performed on an Elementar Vario EL analyzer. Melting points were determined on a SGW X-4 microscopic melting point apparatus and were uncorrected.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Characterization of Novel Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The chemicals used were of reagent grade. Removal of all solvents was carried out under reduced pressure. The 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded in d6-DMSO 2% solutions on a “Bruker Avance III” (400.13 and 100.61 MHz) (Karlsruhe, Germany). Chemical shifts δ are given in ppm referring to the signal center using the solvent peaks for reference: d6-DMSO 2.50 ppm. IR spectra were recorded on a Spectrum 100 FT-IR spectrophotometer (PerkinElmer) using the universal ATR sampling accessory Agilent 5975C VL MSD (Waltham, MA, USA) with triple axis detector, performed using the method by Druta: temperature 60–320 °C, run time: 32.333 min, flow 1.1062 mL/min, pressure 9.418 psi and method steroid 250, temperature 180–250 °C, run time 29 min, flow 1.1062 mL/ min, pressure 16.528 psi. All products were analyzed by CHN elemental analysis (Elementar Vario EL analyzer) (Santa Clara, CA, USA). Melting points (uncorrected) were determined on a Boetius apparatus (Dresden, Germany). Thin-layer chromatography was carried out on Merck aluminum TLC plates, silica gel 60 coated with fluorescent indicator F254.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Synthesis and Characterization of N-(2-Pyridylmethyl)iminodiethanol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All of the chemicals and solvents
used for synthesis were obtained from commercial sources and used
as received without further purification. All of the reactions were
carried out under aerobic conditions. N-(2-Pyridylmethyl)iminodiethanol
was prepared according to the literature procedure.11 (link) The elemental analyses (C, H, and N) were carried out using
an Elementar Vario EL analyzer. Fourier transform IR spectra (4000–400
cm–1) were measured on a PerkinElmer Spectrum GX
spectrometer with samples prepared as KBr disks.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!