The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Rabbit anti h pylori antibody

Manufactured by Abcam
Sourced in United Kingdom

Rabbit anti-H. pylori antibody is a primary antibody used in laboratory research applications. It is specific to the Helicobacter pylori bacterium, which is commonly associated with gastric ulcers and other gastrointestinal conditions. This antibody can be used to detect the presence and localization of H. pylori in various sample types.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

3 protocols using rabbit anti h pylori antibody

1

Oral Vaccine Delivery via Polysaccharide Adjuvant

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The oral vaccines were prepared by using 100 μg of FVpE in 500 μl polysaccharide adjuvant (PA) containing LBP (20 μg/mL) and chitosan (1%, w/w). Closed ileal loop and immunohistochemical analysis were performed to verify whether PA could facilitate the delivery of FVpE to Peyer's patches (24 (link)). Briefly, 6 week-old male SPF BALB/c mice were fasted overnight. Then, the mice were sacrificed and the closed ileal loops containing one or two Peyer's patches were prepared. An equivalent amount of FVpE protein with or without PA, was injected into the lumen of ileal loops. After incubation for 1 h, the ileal loops were excised and washed with PBS. The tissue samples were then fixed and freeze-sectioned. The FVpE protein were detected using rabbit anti-H. pylori antibody (Abcam, UK) and Goat anti-rabbit IgG conjugated with Alexa Fluor® 647 (Abcam, UK). A well-known M cell specific antibody, anti-Gp2 monoclonal antibody conjugated with Alexa Fluor® 488 (MBL, Japan), was used for localization of M cells in Peyer's patch. Besides, nuclei were stained by DAPI (Sigma, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Detection of H. pylori

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
H. pylori were detected in infected gastric tissues by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using a rabbit anti-H. pylori antibody (Abcam, Milton, Cambridge, UK). Positive-staining cells were visualized with diaminobenzidine (DAB) (Vectastain Elite ABC Kit for rabbit; Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) and morphometrically analyzed with Leica DM 2500 microscopy and Leica Application Suite software (version 4.4; Leica microsystems, Heerbrugg, Switzerland). The evaluation of H. pylori-positive cells as marker of the infection was performed by counting the H. pylori-positive cells distributed in the non-infected control gastric tissue. Paraffin embedded longitudinal sections of antrum and corpus were stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and evaluated. It was graded for gastritis and mucosal changes and analyzed by a double blind test according to the grading scheme for rodents [32 (link),37 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantifying H. pylori Adherence to Host Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells treated with compounds, enzymes, OMVs, blocking antibodies, or inhibitors were infected with H. pylori 26695 (MOI = 50) at 37 °C for 1 h. After the cells were washed to remove non-adherent bacteria, they were detached with 2 mM EDTA and fixed with 2% formaldehyde. Cells with plasma membrane-associated H. pylori bacteria were stained with rabbit anti-H. pylori antibody (Abcam, 1:1,000) at 4 °C for 16 h and then washed with PBS. The secondary antibody was fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated goat anti-rabbit antibody (Invitrogen, 1:1000), which was applied at 4 °C for 1 h, and the samples were then washed with PBS. Cells were analyzed by a flow cytometry system (BD FACSCalibur Calibur Flow Cytometer 4 Color). BD FACStation Software (Version 3.3) was used for the data acquisition. Adherence was quantitated in terms of the proportion of cells with adherent H. pylori. At least over 10,000 cells were collected. For gating strategy, as shown in Supplementary Fig. 5, cell debris was first removed by gating the main cell population using the FSC/SSC gating. Mock-treated cells (cells only without bacterial infection) that had been treated with the same staining procedure as aforementioned were used to distinguish the boundary between the positive or negative staining populations. An identical threshold was applied for all samples within the same cell line.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!