The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

13 protocols using echotip procore

1

Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We performed EUS using a convex linear-array endoscope (GF-UCT260 or GF-UCT240; Olympus Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan and EG-580UT: Fujifilm Corp, Tokyo, Japan) connected to an ultrasound device (Prosound SSD-α10; Hitachi Aloka, Tokyo, Japan, EU-ME1 or EU-ME2 PREMIER PLUS; Olympus, SU-1 ultrasound processor; Fujifilm Corp). EUS-FNA was performed with a 22- and/or 25-gauge needle (EZ-Shot 3; Olympus Medical Systems; Acquire, Boston Scientific Corp., Marlborough, MA, USA; EchoTip ProCore, Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA; SonoTip II, Medi-Globe GmbH, Rohrdorf, Germany; Expect, Boston Scientific Corp.).
EUS-FNA was repeated until sufficient sampling had been performed for rapid on-site evaluation or until the endoscopist believed that further sampling was unlikely to increase the amount of tissue.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

KRAS Mutation Detection in EUS-FNA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
EUS-FNA was performed with a 22-gauge needle (EZ shot 2, Olympus, Corp., Tokyo, Japan; EchoTip Procore, COOK medical, Inc, Bloomington, IN, USA) using a linear echoendoscope (UCT240AL5 or UCT260, Olympus, Corp., Tokyo, Japan). After the aspirated materials were placed onto a petri dish using a stylet, the white tissues that were likely to contain a lot of pancreatic tissue were placed in formalin solution for pathological analysis, and the red tissues that were likely to contain a lot of blood were divided on two glass slides using a fitting method. One slide was stained with rapid hematoxylin and eosin for ROSE, and the other was fixed with alcohol for subsequent Papanicolaou staining. The needle catheter was flushed with 2 mL of saline, and residual materials were collected and placed into 2-mL tubes for KRAS mutation analysis [17 (link)]. In ROSE, the quality of the aspirated materials was assessed by a cytologist in a room. Residual materials were frozen and sent to a clinical testing company, and after DNA extraction, KRAS mutation analysis was performed using the Scorpion amplified refractory mutation system (scorpion-ARMS) method (BML, Inc., Tokyo, Japan) [18 (link)] or the polymerase chain reaction–reverse sequence specific oligonucleotide (PCR-rSSO) method (SRL, Inc., Tokyo, Japan) [19 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

EUS-guided Fine Needle Tissue Aspiration for Subepithelial Lesions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The EUS Probe (UM-2R; Olympus, Tokyo, Japan) and probe driving unit (MAJ-935; Olympus) were used to map the lesion. The image frequency of the probe was 12 MHz. EUS-guided FNTA was performed with a linear array echoendoscope (GF-UCT260; Olympus) and probe driving unit (MAJ-1720; Olympus). Under ultrasound guidance, SETs were punctured with 19-, 20-, 22-, or 25-gauge needles (EchoTip ProCore, Cook Medical Inc, Bloomington, IN; EchoTip Ultra, Cook Medical; EZ Shot3 Plus, Olympus). After visualizing the tip of the catheter, the needle was advanced from the catheter sheath through the wall of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and into the target lesions under ultrasound guidance. The stylet was removed, and the initial passes were performed by moving the needle back and forth within the target lesion for 15 to 30 seconds. No suction was applied during biopsy unless the biopsy failed to yield any material or if the lesion was cystic.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

EUS-Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration of Adrenal Glands

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All patients provided written informed consent previous to the procedure. All EUS-guided TA were performed by an experienced endosonographer. Deep sedation was assisted by endoscopist or anesthesiologist, depending on the sedation protocol of each center. A linear array echoendoscope (Olympus GF-UCT140-AL5 or UCT-180, Pentax EG-3870UTK or EG-3270UK, Fujifilm EG-580UT) was used to identify and puncture the suspected AG. Left AGs were evaluated from the stomach, and right AGs from the duodenum. EUS-guided puncture was performed using a fine needle (25 or 22G in size), either cytological (EchoTipUltra, Cook; ExpectEndoscopic Ultrasound Aspiration Needle, BostonSC; BeaconFNA exchange system, Medtronic-Covidien) or cytohistopathological (EchoTip ProCore, Cook; SharkCoreFNB exchange system, Medtronic-Covidien). Color Doppler imaging was used to avoid interposal vessels. The suction technique applied, if any (stylet slow-pull vs. standard suction), and type and size of needle were items selected at the discretion of the endosonographer. In patients with antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy, the recommendations of the international guidelines were followed (i.e., European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy or British Society of Gastroenterology, 2008) [14 (link)]. EUS-guided FNA of a left AG example is shown in Fig 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

EUS-guided FNA/FNB Needle Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
EUS examinations were performed using linear echoendoscopes (GF-UCT 260, Olympus Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan or EG 3870 UTK Pentax Medical Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) coupled with the corresponding US processor (Aloka Prosound Alpha-10, Aloka, Tokyo, Japan or Hitachi Preirus, Hitachi Medical Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). Commercially available 22 and 25-gauge FNA needles (EZ Shot 2 and EZ Shot 3 Plus Nitinol, Olympus, Tokyo, Japan; Expect, Boston Scientific, Natick, MA, USA; EchoTip Ultra, Cook Medical, Bloomington, IN, USA) or FNB needles (Acquire, Boston Scientific; EchoTip ProCore, Cook Medical) were used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

EUS-Guided Fine-Needle Biopsy for Diagnosis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A linear echoendoscope (EG3870UTK, Pentax, Japan) and an ultrasound processor (HI VISON Ascendus, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) were used to examine the patients under deep sedation. The characteristics of target lesions were recorded. Before sampling, the echoendoscope was stabilized in the stomach or in the duodenum. Then, transmural puncture of the target lesion was performed by EUS-FNB using a 22 gauge reverse-bevel needle (EchoTip Procore®, Wilson-Cook Medical, Limerick, Ireland) and by applying fanning and standard suction21 (link). All EUS-procedures of the study were performed by either of two dedicated and experienced endosonographers (> 1000 procedures).
The yield of EUS-FNB was put into formalin tubes and the FNB-core was assessed macroscopically. Additional FNB-passes were performed if the cores were considered inadequate at gross examination. No fixed number of passes was performed. Routine EUS-FNA (EchoTip®, Wilson-Cook Medical), and not EUS-FNB, was preferred during some periods when diagnostics was performed by subspecialized cytopathologists or if no FNB-needle was available on-site.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

EUS-guided Fine Needle Biopsy Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

All the EUS procedures were performed by experienced endosonographers with > 500 diagnostic EUS and > 100 FNA and/or FNB performed, without any specific experience in cytopathology. All of the procedures were performed or under deep sedation with propofol by the anesthetist or under conscious sedation with benzodiazepine plus pethidine administration by the endosonographer. Linear echoendoscopes were used for all the examinations (GF-UCT 140 and GF-UCT180, Olympus, Hamburg, Germany with the corresponding integrated display units EU-ME2 – Premier Plus or with Aloka α-10 system; EG-3270UK Pentax, Hamburg, Germany). Different sizes of FNB needles were used for the study, specifically 25G, 22G, and 20G (EchoTip ProCore, Cook Medical, and Acquire, Boston Scientific; Sharkcore, Medtronics). Lesion biopsied were: pancreatic masses, common bile duct (CBD) or gallbladder masses, thoracic and abdominal lymph nodes, esophageal/gastric/duodenal or rectal submucosal lesions, and perirectal lesions. The choice of the needle was decided by the endosonographer based on personal experience and lesion to target. After the needle puncture, the specimens were acquired either with the suction technique (ST) or with the slow-pull technique (SPT). Standard or fanning technique were also used for sampling the lesion
12 (link)
.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

EUS-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
If the lesion was considered appropriate for sampling, puncture was performed via the gastric wall or duodenum with a 22-gauge FNB device (Echotip ProCore; Wilson-Cook Medical, Winston-Salem, NC, USA), which features a hollowed-out reverse bevel at the tip of the needle. The stylet was then removed after puncturing the lesion. The needle was moved to and fro 10-15 times within the lesion and finally withdrawn from the lesion guided by real-time EUS imaging. The application of suction was performed at the discretion of the endosonographers. Given that our institutions do not have an on-site pathologist, the procedure was repeated until whitish material became visible macroscopically. A maximum of four passes was made for each lesion. The procedure was considered successful if the punctures had been completed as described above. Successful sample collection was defined as having ample sample material to make a diagnosis at the cytological or histological level.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

EUS-Guided Fine Needle Biopsy Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All procedures were performed with the patients under procedural sedation placed in the left lateral decubitus position. EUS were performed by one highly experienced endosonographer (S. D.) using a radial scanning echoendoscope (Pentax EG-3670URK, Hamburg, Germany). All lesions were characterized by size, suspected origin layer, and echotexture. Based on these findings a suspected prior EUS-FNB diagnosis was made. An additional linear array echoendoscope (Pentax EG-3870UTK, Hamburg, Germany) was used in case of EUS-FNB. EUS-FNB was carried out with a disposable 22-gauge core biopsy needle (EchoTip ProCore, Wilson-CookMedical, Winston-Salen, NA, USA): After endosonographically visualisation of the targeted lesion the needle was inserted into the tumor under endosonograhic guidance. Once the needle was within the lesion the stylet was removed and suction was applied using a 10-mL syringe while moving the needle back and forth within the lesion for at least 5 times. Finally suction was released and the needle was withdrawn from the lesion. After the procedure the patients were hospitalized for 1 night and monitored for possible postprocedural complications such as abdominal pain, infection, bleeding or other symptoms.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Diagnostic Biopsy Procedures for Suspected Malignant Biliary Strictures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In patients with extrinsic type, if malignancy was not detected on the initial TPB for suspected MBS, a follow‐up biopsy was performed by EUS‐FNAB (Fig. 1). EUS‐FNAB was performed in a standardized manner by two experienced investigators using a linear‐array echoendoscope (GF‐UCT240; Olympus Medical Systems) in patients under conscious sedation. FNAB was performed from the stomach using a standard 22 gauge (G), or from the duodenum with a 25G, FNAB device (Echotip ProCore; Wilson‐Cook Medical, Winston‐Salem, NC). After puncturing the lesion, the stylet was removed, and suction was applied using a 5–10 mL syringe. The needle was then moved to and fro 15–20 times and withdrawn from the lesion after suction was released. For specimen preparation and analysis, we used a triple approach comprising simultaneous cytopathologic and histologic evaluations with on‐site examination 14. In patients with intrinsic type, the follow‐up biopsy was performed by a second TPB using the same method as the initial TPB during ERCP.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!