The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Automated link 48 platform

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies
Sourced in United States

The Automated Link 48 platform is a lab equipment product from Agilent Technologies. It is designed for automated sample preparation and processing. The core function of this platform is to provide a standardized and efficient solution for various laboratory workflows.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using automated link 48 platform

1

Tumor Immune Microenvironment Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We obtained tumor tissues from different origins, including the lung, liver, lymph nodes, soft tissue and bones. According to manufacturer’s recommendations, IHC was conducted using 4–5 μm formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) sections. The PD-L1 clone 28-8 pharmDx kit and the Dako Automated Link 48 platform were used to measure the expression of PD-L1. CD4 (clone B468A, diluted at 1:200, Santa Cruz, Texas, USA) and CD8 (clone 144B, diluted at 1:100, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) expression in T cells, and CD68 (clone PG-M1, diluted at 1:600, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) expression on macrophages were also assessed. Two pathologists independently scored the stained tissues, and the clinical parameters were kept confidential from these two pathologists.
The tumor proportion score (TPS) was used to assess PD-L1 expression. The percentage of tumor cells stained with partial or complete membranes was the definition of TPS. The positive expression of PD-L1 was considered as TPS ≥ 1%. Among all nucleated cells in the tumor mesenchyme, the proportion of positive cells for CD4, CD8, and CD68 expression was assessed. Positivity on lymphocytes was set at 5, 5, and 20% for CD4, CD8, and CD68, respectively. Based on PD-L1 expression and CD8+ T cell infiltration, the tumor microenvironment was divided into three subgroups (both negative, both positive, or single-positive).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

PD-L1 Expression Evaluation Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemical staining for PD-L1 expression was performed using 22C3 pharmDx assay (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, US) and the Automated Link 48 Platform (Dako, Carpinteria, CA, US) in formalin-fixed tumor samples obtained by surgical resection or small biopsy (percutaneous needle biopsy, bronchoscopic mucosal biopsy, or endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial biopsy) before commencement of first-line TKI treatment. Neoplastic cells were considered positive in the presence of cell membrane staining. PD-L1 expression was determined using the tumor proportion score (TPS), which is defined as the percentage of viable tumor cells showing partial or complete membrane staining. Based on PD-L1 expression, the tumors were categorized into three groups (< 1%, 1–49%, and ≥50%), according to the TPS by counting at least 100 viable cells.21 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

PD-L1 Expression Quantification Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PD-L1 IHC testing was performed at Integrated Oncology/LabCorp (New York, NY) using the PD-L1 clone 22C3 pharmDx kit and Dako Automated Link 48 platform. PD-L1 TPS was calculated as the percentage of at least 100 viable tumor cells with complete or partial membrane staining. The TPS interpretation was provided by the commercial vendor pathologist.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

PD-L1 Expression Evaluation in Tumor Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of PD-L1 expression on tumor cells was assessed using the PD-L1 Clone 22C3 pharmDx kit (Dako; Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) and the Automated Link 48 platform (Dako, Carpinteria, CA). The percentage of positive membrane staining of PD-L1 was calculated after the evaluation of at least 100 viable cells, which was referred to as the tumor proportional score (TPS)30 (link). TPS was categorized into three groups (no expression with TPS of < 1%, low expression with TPS of 1–49%, and high expression with TPS of 50–100%), which used 22C3 antibodies as a companion diagnostic test31 (link),32 (link). The stained tissue sections were independently scored by Dr. Chang-Yao Chu at Chi-Mei Medical Center and other pathologists at NCKUH who were blinded to the patients’ clinical characteristics and outcomes.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Tumor PD-L1 Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemical detection of tumor PD-L1 expression was determined using the PD-L1 Clone 22C3 kit (pharmDx) and the Automated Link 48 platform (Dako, Carpinteria, CA). The percentage of tumor cells with PD-L1 expression (positive membrane staining) was determined by counting at least 100 viable cells. This analysis was provided by Dr. Yih-Leong Chang and other pathologists in the National Taiwan University Hospital.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

PD-L1 Expression Evaluation in Lung Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To evaluate PD-L1 expression, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples of primary lung tumors were employed. Immunohistochemical staining was conducted utilizing the PD-L1 Clone 22C3 pharmDx Kit and Dako Automated Link 48 platform. The tumor proportion score (TPS) was defined as the percentage of cells with positive membrane staining after inspecting 100 viable cancer cells, which were categorized into three groups based on TPS values (TPS of 0%, 1–49% and ≥50%). The combined proportion score (CPS) was defined as expression of PD-L1 in both tumor and inflammatory cells, CPS was evaluated by the following formula: (PD-L1 positive tumor cells + PD-L1 positive inflammatory cells)/(total tumor cells) * 100, the optimal cut-off of PD-L1 CPS was unclear, we also categorized CPS into three groups (CPS of 0, 1–49, and ≥50) according to recent studies.14 (link),15 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

PD-L1 Expression Analysis in Tumors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An IHC analysis of PD-L1 expression was conducted using PD-L1 monoclonal 28-8 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) or E1L3N (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, USA) antibodies on a typical tumor slide. A section containing adequate tumor tissue was called a representative slide. The assay was carried out using the Dako Automated Link 48 platform. We determined the expression of PD-L1 using the tumor proportion score (TPS), which simply refers to the percentage of viable tumor cells with at least partial membranous staining in the entire viable tumor cell population on the whole slide. Two trained pathologists performed this procedure using light microscopes (Olympus BX43, Japan). The PD-L1 subgroups were as follows: negative (<1%), low (1–49%), and high (≥50%).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!