The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Model x pert pro

Manufactured by Malvern Panalytical
Sourced in United Kingdom, Germany

The Model-X'pert Pro is a versatile X-ray diffraction (XRD) system designed for a wide range of materials analysis applications. It features advanced optics and a high-performance detector to deliver accurate and reliable data. The system's core function is to perform qualitative and quantitative phase analysis of crystalline materials.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using model x pert pro

1

Crystallinity Analysis of CUR and MNPs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The X-ray diffraction of CUR, placebo microbeads, drug-loaded microbeads, MNPs and MNPs/drug-loaded microbeads were performed by a wide-angle X-ray scattering diffractometer (Panalytical X-ray Diffractometer, model-X'pert Pro) with Cu-K α radiation (λ= 1.54060) at a scanning rate of 10°/min to determine the crystallinity.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterization of Zn-Co Composite Films

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The prepared Zn-Co composite film is probed by a thin-film X-ray diffraction study (Model- X’Pert Pro powered by pANalytical). From the main diffracted peak, the average grain size can be estimated using the Scherer equation (1), D(hkl)=kλβcosθ Here, D(hkl) is the average grain size, k is shape constant (0.9), λ is the incident wavelength of x-ray (λ = 0.15405 nm), β is the full width half maximum (FWHM), θ is the incident angle of x-ray. The prepared films’ morphology is examined by a field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) (Model- sigma essential powered by Zeiss Microscopy). The hardness inspection of the prepared films is measured with the HM-113 by Mitutoyo Corp Vickers hardness machine by applying 100 g load with a dwell time of 10 s. The electrochemical studies are probed through Autolab PGSTAT302N electrochemical workstation by Metrohm. The corrosion analysis evaluation was conducted with potentiodynamic polarization scanning (PPS) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) with the immersion of 3.5 wt.% NaCl solution. The conventional three-electrode system was used for all the electrochemical studies. All the prepared films were served as a working electrode, Ag/AgCl as a reference electrode, platinum wire as a counter electrode.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comprehensive Characterization of Adsorbents

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The textural examination of the adsorbent is performed using NOVA 3200 equipment (Quantachrome Instruments, Florida, USA) for nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms at 196 °C. For the degassing of the surface, samples were processed at 150 °C for 2 h under vacuum (10−4 Torr). The surface area (SBET) of the adsorption isotherm branch was estimated using the BET equation. The Barrett, Joyner, and Halenda (BJH) technique was employed to distribute the pores of the branch of the desorption of isotherms. An X-ray diffractometer, PANalytical Model X, pert PRO, equipped with Cu Kά radiations (k = 1.5418 A˚), scanned at 0.3 min−1, was used to conduct the XRD study. Before and after the sorption process, the surface for the adsorbent was scanned and imaged using a JEOL JSM-6510LV energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy scanning electron microscope (EDX SEM) (Jeol, Tokyo, Japan). A Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectrometer (JASCO 4100, Easton, USA) was employed to identify important functional groups on adsorbent surfaces in a wave range of 400–4000 cm−1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

X-Ray Diffraction Analysis of Turface

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X-ray diffraction patterns of Turface samples were obtained from oriented samples on glass slides [44] using a PANalytical X-ray diffractometer (Model X′Pert PRO; Natick, MA) using Co radiation. Data were from 2 to 80° 2θ, counting for 1s every 0.02° 2θ with a total scan time of 30.5 min. Data analysis was performed using X′Pert HighScore Plus software (Version 2.2, PANalytical B.V.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

X-Ray Diffraction Analysis of Films

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The XRD patterns were obtained using a X-ray diffractometer (PANalytical Model X’pert PRO, Royston, UK). Film samples with dimensions of 4.0 cm × 1.5 cm were cut and fixed in a circular clamp of the instrument. The analysis was carried out directly and the conditions were as follows: (i) voltage and current: 40 kV and 40 mA, respectively; (ii) scan range from 3° to 30°; (iii) step: 0.1° and (iv) speed 1°/min, equipped with a secondary monochromator of graphite beam. The samples were stored at 25 °C and 50% Relative humidity (RH) and analyzed in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Structural Characterization of ZnO Nanocrystals

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ZnO nanocrystals grown on bare/patterned ITO were structurally characterized using an X-ray diffractometer (PANalytical X’pert Pro model) having Cu Kα radiation (λ = 1.54 Å) in the 2θ range 20° to 80° using grazing incidence X-ray diffraction (GIXRD). The setup consists of an X-ray mirror, a Ni filter, and a PIXcel3D detector in scanning line mode. The surface morphology of the prepared samples was investigated by using a field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) using a Zeiss Supra 40 device. A JEOL 2200FS transmission electron microscope (TEM) was used to investigate the crystallinity of the NCs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Comprehensive Characterization of Novel Nanomaterials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the chemicals utilized in this study were procured from commercially available sources and used without requiring additional modifications. Solvents were distilled before use. Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectra were obtained using a Bruker Vector-22 infrared spectrometer with KBr pellets. Melting points were measured using a Buchi 535 melting point apparatus. The SEM and EDX analyses were performed using a TESCAN Vega Model scanning electron microscope. XRD patterns were obtained using a X'pert Pro model from Panalytical (Holland). TGA experiments were conducted using a TGA 209F1 thermoanalyzer instrument from Netzsch, (Germany). TEM of the samples were determined using a Zeiss EM10C Transmission Electron Microscope (Germany). NMR spectra were recorded Bruker Avance III HD spectrometer on a 500 or 300 MHz spectrometer for the 1H nucleus, and a 125.7 or 75 MHz spectrometer for the 13C nucleus, using CDCl3 or DMSO-d6 as solvent.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Structural Analysis of Pulps by XRD

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Structural analysis of the pulps was performed using the X-ray diffraction technique (XRD, PANalytical, X’Pert Pro model, Almelo, The Netherlands) in a Bragg-Brentano geometry with CuKα radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å) at 45 KV and 40 mA equipped with X’Celerator detector. The diffractograms were obtained with a range of 0.0501° in an angular amplitude 2θ from 10 to 40°. Crystallinity index values were calculated according to the Segal peak height method [27 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Characterization of FVR-Loaded Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The size and PDI of the NPs were measured directly by dynamic light scattering (DLS), and the ζ-potential was determined by electrophoretic mobility of the NPs, using a Zetasizer (Nano-ZS (Malvern Panalytical Ltd., Malvern, UK) without further dilution or pH adjustments (pH 5.5 ± 0.3). The morphology was observed by TEM (JEM-1400Flash, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and FE-SEM (JSM-7610F, Oxford X-Max 20, JEOL Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). LC and EE of the FVR-MCS-ALG-NPs were determined using an indirect method after ultracentrifugation at 4 °C and 105,000 × g speed for 1 h. The absorbance was measured at 363 nm, and the amount of the free FVR from the supernatant was calculated against the standard curve (Agilent Cary 60, Agilent Technology, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The LC (Equation (1)) and EE (Equation (2)) of the FVR-MCS-ALG-NPs were calculated as follows:

where Wt is the initial amount of FVR added in the formulation, Ws is free FVR in the supernatant, and Wnp is the weight of the NPs after lyophilization.
The thermal properties were determined using a thermogravimetric analyzer (TG 209 F3 Tarsus®, Netzsch, Germany) in a nitrogen atmosphere at 20 °C/min. The crystalline structure was analyzed using a wide-angle X-ray diffractometer (XRD, PANalytical X’Pert Pro model, Kassel-Waldau, Germany), operated at a speed of 0.2° 2θ/step at room temperature.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!