The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

9 protocols using model 785 vacuum blotter

1

Plasmid DNA Analysis by Blotting and Hybridization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plasmid samples were fractionated by electrophoresis in a 0.7% agarose gel and DNA molecules were revealed by staining with ethidium bromide at 0.5 μg mL-1. The image of the gels was obtained with GelDoc 200 (BioRad) and the bands were quantitated with the Quantity One 4.5.2 software (BioRad). The DNA fragments were transferred to a nylon membrane Biodyne A (PALL Gelman Laboratory, AnnArbor, MI, United States) by 5 inches Hg of vacuum for 2 h using the Vacuum Blotter model 785 (Bio-Rad). Internal regions of gutF, gutR and gutB genes were amplified by PCR generating amplicons 1, 2, and 3, respectively, in reactions catalyzed by PHFP, and by using as substrate total plasmidic DNA preparation of P. parvulus 2.6 and the primer pairs shown in Table 2. Then, the amplicons were labeled with digoxigenin-dUTP by using the DIG high prime DNA labeling and detection starter kit II (Roche, Mannheim, Germany). Each DIG-labeled DNA probe (25 ng mL-1) was used for hybridization at 45°C following the specifications of the kit’s supplier. The hybridization bands were revealed with the chemiluminescent substrate CSPD, and the signals were detected with the LAS-3000 imaging system (Fujifilm, Stamford, CT, United States).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Plasmid DNA Detection by Southern Blot

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After gel electrophoresis, plasmid DNA fragments were transferred to a positively charged nylon membrane (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) by a vacuum blotter model 785 (Bio-Rad, Hercules, USA). The fosB PCR product was used as the positive control, while plasmid extracted from Escherichia coli V517 was used as the marker. The membrane was hybridized with fosB probe mixed by fosB1, fosB4, fosB5 and fosB6 probes according to the manufacturer’s instructions for the DIG High Prime DNA Labeling and Detection Starter Kit (Roche, Mannheim, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Plasmid DNA Digestion and Southern Blot

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plasmid DNA was digested with 50 U of Hind III (New England Biolabs) for 1 h at 37°C and separated by electrophoresis for 3 h at 45 V in 0.8% agarose. After migration, the digested plasmids were transferred to positively charged nylon membranes (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany) using a vacuum blotter model 785 (Bio-Rad). The membranes were probed with digoxigenin labelled PCR products for the genes aad(D), lnu(A), spc, tet(K) and tet(M) [46 (link)] using the PCR DIG probe synthesis kit (Roche Diagnostics) (S1 Table). Pre-hybridizations and hybridizations were carried out at 65°C for 30 min and 18 h, respectively, in hybridization buffer with subsequent washes, as recommended by the manufacturer. To detect the presence of digoxigenin-labelled probes, the colorimetric method (NBT/BCIP substrate solution, Roche Applied Science) was used. PCR products were used as hybridization control and control DNA DIG-labelled as detection control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Northern Blot Analysis of Tomato Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The total RNA preparation (500 ng/μL) was denatured at 68 °C for 15 min and fractionated by electrophoresis at 100 V for 10 min on a 1.2% (w/v) agarose gel in 1× 3-(N-morpholino) propane sulfonic acid (MOPS) buffer. RNA was then transferred to a nylon membrane (Biodyne; Pall Corp., Port Washington, NY, USA) using a vacuum blotting apparatus (Vacuum Blotter Model 785; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) for 30–90 min at 5 inches mercury (Hg), UV-crosslinked at 120,000 µJ/cm2 in a UV crosslinker (UVP CX-2000; BM Equipment Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), and hybridized with digoxigenin (DIG)-labeled cRNA probes as described previously [61 (link)]. DIG-labeled cRNA probes for tomato genes EXPASIN 2 (slEXPA2; DDBJ accession no., AF096776), and chalcone synthase (TCHS2; DDBJ, accession no., X55195) were prepared from recombinant plasmid DNAs containing a partial sequence of the gene in pBluescript II SK(–) under the control of either T7 or T3 RNA polymerase promoter constructed in this study. Hybridized signals were visualized using the ChemiDoc-XRS (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) imaging system and quantified using the Quantity One (version 4.6.2) software package.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

RNA Electrophoresis and Membrane Transfer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA samples were boiled at 95 °C for 8 min, then cooled to room temp, spun briefly and loaded onto the gel. Gel was run at 100 V for ~2.5 hr. Gels were imaged on a Typhoon imager to assess RNA quality, then transferred to a Amersham Hybond N+charged nitrocellulose membrane by a BioRad Model 785 Vacuum Blotter following the manufacturer’s instructions for transferring RNA, with the alterations of prewetting the membrane with 10 x SSC only and maintaining vacuum between 10–15 inHg. Transfer proceeded for 2 hr. Following transfer, the membrane was carefully removed from the vacuum blotter and placed face up on paper towel for UV crosslinking in a Stratagene UV Stratalinker 2400 on the automatic setting (120 mJ) three times.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Southern Blot Analysis of Flounder Rh2-b Gene

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Approximately 10 μg of genomic DNA per lane was digested with the restriction enzymes Eco RI, Pst I, or Sac I (TaKaRa) and electrophoresed on a 0.7% agarose gel. DNA samples were then transferred to a Hybond‐N+ nylon membrane (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK) using a Model 785 vacuum blotter (Bio‐Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). DNA was fixed to the membrane using an XL‐1500 UV cross‐linker (Spectroline, NY, USA). As a hybridization probe, exon 1 of the barfin flounder rh2‐b gene was used (previously described in Kasagi et al., 2015). Amplified cDNA was labeled with an Alkphos‐Direct labeling kit (GE Healthcare), and hybridization was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. Stringent washing was conducted at 60°C in primary buffer wash (per the manufacturer's instructions), which contained 0.2 M of NaCl and 0.1% of SDS, which allowed approximately 20% mismatch (Sambrook & Russell, 2001). Signals were detected using CDP‐Star (GE Healthcare) and Hyperfilm ECL (GE Healthcare).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Southern Blot Analysis of Transgenic Plants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA (10 ug) cleaved with SacI was transferred to Amersham Hybond-N+ membrane (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) by 10 × SSC using Model 785 Vacuum Blotter (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). [α-32P] dCTP-labeled hpt, gus, gfp, and bar fragments with Amersham Rediprime II Random Prime Labelling System (GE Healthcare, Buckinghamshire, UK) were used as hybridization probes. Hybridization and washing methods were according to Sambrook et al. [38 ]. After washing, the membranes were exposed to a phosphor screen for 5–12 h and scanned on Typhoon FLA 9500 (IP: 635 nm, PMT: 500 V, Pixel size 200 μm). Probe primer sequences are presented in Table S2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantification of HBV cccDNA from HepG2.2.15 cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HepG2.2.15 cells were washed twice with ice-cold PBS and lysed in 800 μL of lysis buffer [50 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 1 mmol/L EDTA and 1% NP-40]. Cell lysates were centrifuged for 1 min at 10000 g to precipitate cell nuclei. Cellular genomic DNA and cccDNA were removed by the addition of 10 mM MgCl2 and 100 μg/mL DNase I, and the mixture was incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. Digestion was stopped by the addition of 25 mmol/L EDTA (pH 8.0). Proteins were digested with 0.5 mg/mL proteinase K and 1% SDS for 2 h at 55 °C. HBV DNA from intracellular core particles was purified by phenol/chloroform (1:1) extraction and isopropanol precipitation in the presence of 15 μg of tRNA and 200 mmol/L NaAc (pH 5.2)[28 (link),29 (link)].
For Southern blot analysis, HBV DNA was subjected to agarose gel electrophoresis, followed by denaturation and transfer to nylon membranes using a Model 785 Vacuum Blotter (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, United States). DNA was fixed to membranes using an Ultraviolet Crosslinker (UVP, Upland, CA, United States). DNA hybridization and detection were performed using the DIG High Prime DNA Labelling and Detection Starter Kit II (Roche).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

RNA Extraction and Northern Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were grown in LB + ampicillin (50 mg/L) to OD600 = 0.5, harvested by centrifugation, and resuspended in 100 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris pH 8.0, 1 mM EDTA pH 8.0, and 1% SDS. RNA was extracted twice by phenol, pH 4.5 (once at 65 °C and once at room temperature) followed by chloroform extraction. RNA in the aqueous layer was then precipitated by isopropanol and 0.3 M NaOAc (pH 5.5), washed with 80% ethanol, and resuspended in water. Purified RNA was separated on a 1.2% agarose-formaldehyde denaturing gel and transferred to a nylon membrane (Hybond-N+, Cytiva) in 10 × SSC buffer using a Model 785 Vacuum Blotter (Bio-Rad). RNA was crosslinked to the membrane with the Stratalinker UV crosslinker (Stratagene). Pre-hybridization and hybridization was performed in PerfectHyb Plus Hybridization Buffer (Milipore Sigma). RNA was probed with 50 nM 5’-digoxigenin labeled DNA oligos (IDT). Digoxigenin was detected with anti-Digoxigenin-AP antibodies diluted 1:1000 (Milipore Sigma). Chemiluminescent signals from alkaline phosphatase were detected with CDP-Star (Milipore Sigma) and visualized on Amersham Hyperfilm ECL (GE).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!