The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

13 protocols using sc 20060

1

Biocompatibility Assessment of Microneedle Arrays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For biocompatibility test, general protocol of immunofluorescence was followed. The microneedle array was sterilized with ethylene oxide gas and inserted subcutaneously into the mouse (SKH-1, male, 7 weeks). After explanation of the device at 1, 7, and 14 days, the surrounding tissue was fixed for 24 hours with paraformaldehyde and dehydrated. Dehydrated tissues were embedded in paraffin blocks and sectioned at 5-μm thickness using microtome (RM2255, Leica). For immunofluorescence staining, the paraffin sections were rehydrated with xylene and ethanol and treated with protease for antigen exposure. After antigen retrieval, bovine serum albumin blocker was treated for blocking other reagents. Next, a mouse anti-CD68 antibody (sc-20060; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) diluted at 1:100 was incubated in room temperature for 2 hours. After washing in diluted water, a rabbit anti-CD206 antibody (sc-376232; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) diluted 1:100 was incubated in room temperature for 2 hours. After washing off in PBS, the sections were counterstained with DAPI.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Western Blotting of Muscle Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blotting was used to determine protein expression as previously described [34 (link)]. TA muscle tissue was lysed in RIPA lysis buffer (Biosharp, Hefei, China). After centrifugation, soluble proteins were quantified with a BCA kit (Biosharp) and separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The proteins were electrophoresed until sufficiently separated and then transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes. The PVDF membranes were blocked with 5% nonfat dry milk in Tris-buffered saline, and then the PVDF membranes were incubated with the following primary antibodies: rabbit anti-tubulin (1:5000, Cat. #5335S, CST), rabbit anti-cleaved caspase3 (1:1000, Cat. #9664S, CST), rabbit anti-caspase3 (1:1000, Cat. #9662S, CST), rabbit anti-Bax (1:1000, Cat. #14796S, CST), rabbit anti-Bcl-2 (1:1000, Cat. #3498S, CST), rabbit anti-CD86 (1:1000, Proteintech), mouse anti-CD206 (1:1000, Santa Cruz), and rabbit anti-CD68 (1:1000, sc-20060, Santa Cruz) at 4 °C overnight. Then, the PVDF membranes were incubated with corresponding horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated IgG antibodies at room temperature for 2 h. Bands were visualized using an ECL kit (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). The band densities were quantified with ImageJ software (NIH).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemistry of Aorta Macrophages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The paraffin-embedded aorta tissue sections were deparaffinized and retrieved for antigen. Then, sections were stained with antibody against CD68 (sc-20060, Santa Cruz, USA) or CD163 (A8383, Abclonal, China) following fluorescence-labeled secondary antibodies. Sections were counterstained with DAPI (D106471, Aladdin, China) to characterize nuclei and visualized using a microscope (BX53, Olympus, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunohistochemical Staining of CD68 in Frozen Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Frozen tissue sections were fixed by dropping 4% PFA and allowing to stand for 15 min. It was then washed by immersing it in 10 mM glycine/PBS three times for 5 min. A 2% gelatin solution was added dropwise to the tissue section and allowed to stand for 20 min for blocking. The washing was repeated 3 times by immersing in 10 mM glycine/PBS for 5 min. After further immersing in 0.1% BSA/PBS for 5 min, 1% BSA/PBS containing an antibody against CD68 (1:50, sc-20060, Santa Cruz) was added dropwise, and the mixture was allowed to stand for 40 min. The washing was repeated 5 times by immersing in 0.1% BSA/PBS for 5 min. Next, 1% BSA/PBS containing goat anti-mouse IgG H&L labelled with Alexa Fluor 488 (Ex: 496 nm, Em: 519 nm) (1:200, ab150113, Abcam) was added dropwise and allowed to stand for 40 min. The washing was repeated 5 times by immersing in 0.1% BSA/PBS for 5 min. Counterstaining was performed by immersing in a hematoxylin solution for 30 s and rinsing with a running water for 5 min. Moisture around the section was wiped off with a Kimwipe, dried for about 1 min, then the encapsulant New MX was added dropwise, and the mixture was sealed with a cover glass. The sample was observed with an inverted confocal microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying KCa3.1 in Atrial Macrophages

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following electrophysiological measurement, the atrial tissues were quickly removed and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, embedded in paraffin then sectioned to 5 microns. To identify KCa3.1 and the pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages, the primary KCa3.1 antibody (bs-6675R, Bioss, 1:200) and CD68 antibody (KP1) (sc-20060, Santa Cruz, 1:50) was added to the sections overnight at 4°C. Then, the sections were incubated with the secondary antibody Fluorescein (FITC)–conjugated Affinipure Goat Anti-rabbit IgG (Aspen, AS1110; 1:50) and Fluorescein (CY3)–conjugated Affinipure Goat Anti-mouse IgG (Aspen, AS1111; 1:50) and cell nuclei by DAPI. The results were analyzed using Image-Pro Plus 6.0 software. In each group, four atrial samples from different individuals were randomly selected and used to calculate the mean number of macrophage and quantificat KCa3.1 expression in macrophage in three different fields at 400x magnification. The mean optical density of KCa3.1 in macrophage = Sum of KCa3.1 optical density values in CD68 marked area/CD68 marked area.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Macrophage Polarization in Bone Remodeling during OTM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunofluorescence (IF) was used to observe the polarization of M1/M2 macrophages in the bovine bone mineral grafting area with mechanical force-induced bone remodeling during OTM. The alveolar bone samples from the C, O, and O + B groups (including teeth) were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 48. Then, the samples were decalcified using ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), followed by dehydration in gradient alcohol and clearing in xylene. After embedding in paraffin, serial Sects. (5 μm thick) were acquired, mounted on slides, and stained using IF. To detect macrophage polarization, antibodies recognizing CD11b (integrin subunit alpha M) (1:1000, ab133357, Abcam, Cambridge, UK) as a cell surface marker for M0 macrophages were used. Antibodies recognizing CD68 (1:50, sc-20060, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA) were used to label the M1 macrophages (CD68+CD11b+). Antibodies recognizing CD206 (1:10,000, 60,143-1-Ig, Proteintech, Rosemont, IL, USA) were used to label the M2 macrophages (CD206+CD11b+). The M1/M2 polarization of macrophages in the OTM area with bovine bone mineral grafts was observed [18 (link)]. Five random fields of view were analyzed using Image J software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunohistochemical Profiling of Macrophage Subsets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pancreatic sections were deparaffinized and rehydrated. Tris-EDTA (pH 9.0, G1203, Servicebio, China) was used for antigen retrieval, 0.2% Triton X-100 was used for permeabilization, and 10% donkey serum was used for blocking. The sections were incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C and incubated with secondary antibodies for 1 h at 37°C. For immunofluorescent staining, primary macrophages were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 20 min and blocked in 10% donkey serum. Incubation with primary antibodies was performed overnight at 4°C. Secondary antibody incubation was performed for 1 h at 37°C and DAPI (ab104139, Abcam, U.S.A.) was used to label the nuclei. The primary antibodies included CD68 (1:50, Sc-20060, Santa Cruz), iNOS (1:200, 18985-1-AP, Proteintech), CD206 (1:200, 18704-1-AP, Proteintech), IL-6 (1:200, GB11117, Servicebio), and Hes1 (1:200, ab108937, Abcam). The secondary antibodies included donkey anti-rabbit IgG H&L (Alexa Fluor® 488) (1:200, ab150073, Abcam), and donkey anti-mouse IgG H&L (Alexa Fluor® 594) (1:200, ab150108, Abcam). Five sections in each group were examined and ten 400× images per section were evaluated. iNOS+CD68+ cells represented M1 macrophages, CD206+CD68+ cells represented M2 macrophages, and Hes1+CD68+ cells represented Hes1-positive macrophages.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Tissue Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemical and immunofluorescence staining were carried out according to the procedure described in our previous study (32 (link), 33 (link)). FFPE sections (3 μm) were rehydrated and incubated with primary antibodies against α-SMA (1:100, ab5694, Abcam), Twist (1:100, ab175430, Abcam), HDAC6 (1:100, A11259, ABclonal), CD163 (1:100, GB11340-1, Servicebio), Collagen I (1:400, GB11022-3, Servicebio), CD68 (1:100, sc-20060, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and Arginase-1 (1:100, #93668, Cell Signaling Technology), and then secondary antibodies (Invitrogen). Slides were captured with a Nikon Eclipse 80i microscope equipped with a digital camera (DS-Ri1, Nikon, Shanghai, China).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Ovarian Inflammation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ovaries were fixed and sectioned for immunohistochemistry, as described above (section 2.1.2.), to assess inflammatory cell infiltration (Blankenship and Enders, 1997 (link)). Ovarian sections were incubated at 4 °C overnight with mouse anti-human CD68 (1:200; sc-20060; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) antibody to detect tissue macrophages. Sections with an isotype control antibody served as negative controls. Sections were then incubated with biotinylated anti-mouse secondary antibody and processed using a VECTASTAIN Elite ABC Kit (PK-6102; Vector Laboratories). Following incubation with 3,3΄-diaminobenzidine, sections were counterstained with hematoxylin and imaged using a BX40 microscope and a DP72 camera (Olympus Corporation of the Americas).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantifying Wound Tissue Immunohistochemistry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The wound tissue sections were subjected to immunohistochemical staining. Briefly, following antigen retrieval and permeabilization, sections were incubated with primary antibodies at 4 °C overnight and secondary antibodies at room temperature for 1 h. Finally, the DAB substrate solution was used to reveal the color of the antibody staining. The primary antibodies used in this study were rabbit monoclonal anti-CD68 (1:100; SC-20060; Santa Cruz, Texas, USA), anti-CD31 (1:1000; ab182981; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), and anti-PCNA (1:500; 60097-1-1 g; Proteintech, Wuhan, China). The secondary antibodies used were horseradish peroxidase-conjugated polymer anti-rabbit and anti-mouse antibodies (1:1000; Dako, Glostrup, Denmark). The sections were photographed with a Nikon Eclipse 90i digital camera and an optical microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan). The immunohistochemical staining was analyzed with ImageJ software (NIH) to calculate the integrated optical density of anti-CD68-positive cells and epithelial anti-PCNA-positive cells. The capillary density was calculated as the number of anti-CD31-positive vessels. Three sections of each sample were analyzed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!