The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Plrp s

Manufactured by Agilent Technologies
Sourced in United States

PLRP-S is a porous polymer-based reversed-phase HPLC column designed for the separation of a wide range of compounds, including polar, non-polar, and ionizable analytes. It features a high surface area and a well-defined pore structure, providing excellent resolving power and peak shape.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

18 protocols using plrp s

1

Nanoflow Dual-Trap Single-Column Proteomics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dual trap single column (DTSC)17 (link) was adapted for nanoflow to enable single cell analysis18 (link). The trapping columns were 0.17 μL media bed (EXP2 from Optimize Technologies) packed with 10 μm diameter, 100 Å pore PLRP-S (Agilent) beads, and the analytical column was a PepSep 15 cm x 75 μm packed with 1.9 μm C18 stationary phase (Bruker). The configuration was installed on a Thermo Ultimate 3000 nanoRSLC equipped with one 10-port valve and one 6-port valve and a nano flow selector. Mobile phase A as 0.1% formic acid in water. Mobile phase B was 0.1% formic acid in acetonitrile. Peptides were separated using the following gradient all using linear transitions between conditions: starting conditions of 9% B at 500 nL/min; 22% B over 8 minutes; 37% B over 4.7 minutes; 1000 nL/min flowrate and 98% B over 0.2 minutes; hold at 98% B for 1 minute; reduce to 9% B at 1,000 nL/min over 0.1 minutes; hold at 9% B at 1,000 nL/min for 0.9 min; return to 500 nL/min flowrate in 0.1 min (15 min total). Valves and trapping columns were heated to 55° C and the analytical column was heated to 60° C. See Kreimer et al. for additional details about the dual trap chromatography setup.18 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Limited Proteolysis Analysis of Nucleoporin Complex

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
1 mg/ml of trypsin, chymotrypsin, and elastase stock solutions were separately added to 3 mg/ml of the Nup62·Nup54·Nup58 complex in 1:100 (v/v) ratio. Reaction mixtures were incubated at room temperature, and samples were taken out at different time points. Reactions were quenched by adding guanidine hydrochloride to a final concentration of 5 m. The protein fragments generated in the limited proteolysis experiments were identified as intact peptides measured to within 1 atomic mass unit of mass accuracy, by electrospray ionization-ion trap mass spectrometry (Bruker Amazon), after separation by microbore reversed-phase chromatography on a 300 Å pore polystyrene-divinylbenzene column (PLRP-S, Agilent).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Top-down RPLC-MS/MS Protein Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Top-down RPLC-MS/MS was carried out by either using an Acquity ultra-high pressure LC M-class system (Waters) coupled to a high-resolution maXis II quadrupole time-of-flight (QTOF) mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics) or by using a nanoAcquity ultra-high pressure LC system (Waters) coupled to a high-resolution Impact II QTOF mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics). 600 ng of total protein was injected onto a home-packed PLRP column (PLRP-S) (Agilent Technologies), 10-μm particle size, 500-μm inner diameter, 1,000 Å pore size using an organic gradient of 20 to 65% mobile phase B (mobile phase A: 0.2% FA in H2O; mobile phase B: 0.2% FA in 50:50 acetonitrile/isopropanol) at a constant flow rate of 12 μL/min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Sarcomeric Protein Separation and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sarcomeric protein mixture extracted from VL muscle tissue was separated by reverse phase chromatography (RPC) using a home-packed reversed-phased column (PLRP-S, 200 mm length × 500 μm id, 10 μm particle size, 1,000 Å pore size, Agilent). The RPC separation was performed in a 60 min gradient with mobile phase B increases from 5% to 95% (Mobile phase A: 0.1% formic acid (FA) in water, Mobile phase B: 0.1% FA in 1:1 ethanol:acetonitrile) in a nanoACQUITY UPLC system (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). The nanoACQUITY UPLC system was coupled to an impact II quadrupole-time-of-flight (q-TOF) mass spectrometer (Bruker, Bremen, Germany) for online LC/MS analysis. Mass spectra were collected at 1 Hz over a 500–3000 m/z range.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

LC-MS Analysis of Protein Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LC-MS was performed using an Agilent 1100/1200 LC system connected to a 6510 A QTOF mass spectrometer (Agilent, UK). Samples of 10 µL TK at 0.2 µg/µL were injected onto an Agilent PLRP-S (150 mm × 2.1 mm, 1000 Å, 8 µm) column, maintained at 30 °C. Two mobile phases A (5% MeCN in aqueous 0.1% formic acid) and B (95% MeCN, 5% water, 0.1% formic acid) were used at 0.3 mL/min. The column was pre- equilibrated at 25% B for 1.9 min, before injection, held for 1 min further at 25% B, and then a gradient elution increased B to 99% over 16 min. After 2 min, B was decreased to 25% over 0.1 min. The QTOF mass spectrometer scanned m/z from 100 to 3100 Da. Positive electrospray ionisation (ESI) was used with 4000 V capillary voltage, fragmentor at 175 V, skimmer at 65 V and octopole RF peak at 750 V. Nitrogen was used as the nebuliser and desolvation gas at a flow of 5 L/min. Spectra were acquired every second with an acquisition time of 1000 msec/spectrum. Lockspray was used during analysis to maintain mass accuracy. Data were processed in MassHunter software (version B.07.00) and deconvolved using the maximum entropy deconvolution algorithm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Reverse Phase Chromatography for Protein

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Reverse phase chromatography was performed with a nanoACQUITY UPLC system (Waters; Milford, MA, USA). Mobile phase A (MPA) contained 0.2 % formic acid in nanopure water, and mobile phase B (MPB) contained 0.2% formic acid in 50:50 acetonitrile and isopropanol. Prior to injection, protein samples were desalted by washing through 10 kDa MWCO filters using water six times. For each injection, 5 μL of desalted protein sample (1 μg/μL) was loaded on a home-packed 200 mm × 250 μm PLRP-S (5 μm, 1000Å; Agilent Technology, Santa Clara, CA, USA) capillary column. The column was placed in a column heater set at 50 °C with a constant 6 μL/min flow rate. The RPC gradient consisted of the following concentrations of MPB: 10% MPB at 0 min, 20% at 5 min, 65% at 65 min, 90% at 70 min, held at 90% until 75 min, adjusted back to 10% at 75.1 min, and held at 10% until 80 min. Each run was 80 min long.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Tannin Quantification by RP-HPLC-DAD

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tannin content was quantified using RP-HPLC-DAD (1260 Infinity II, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with a polystyrene divinylbenzene column (PLRP-S, 2.1 × 50 mm, 100 Å, 3 µm, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and a guard column (PRP-1, 3 × 8 mm, Hamilton Co., Reno, NV, USA) of the same material, as previously published [15 (link)]. Briefly, the column oven was at 30 °C. Samples were filtered using a 0.45 µm PTFE filter, and 5 µL was injected. Mobile phases were 1.5% (w/w) 85% ortho-phosphoric acid (mobile phase A) and 20% (v/v) mobile phase A in acetonitrile (mobile phase B) at a flow rate of 0.30 mL/min and a linear gradient as follows: time in min (% B), 0 (14), 12.6 (34), 12.6−13.3 (34),15.1 (70), 15.1−16.8 (70), 19.6 (14), and 19.6−28.0 (14). Tannin quantification was carried out by first drawing a baseline at 0 mAU across the whole chromatogram and then integrating the peak between 16.8 and 19.8 min. Tannin content was expressed as (−)-epicatechin equivalents based on the external calibration curve.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Peptide Purification and Analysis by HPLC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HPLC
was performed using an Agilent 1260 Infinity with a quaternary solvent
delivery system and a 1260 Infinity Diode Array Detector HS controlled
by Agilent OpenLab CDS ChemStation Edition software with detection
at 220 nm. Different columns were used for analysis and purification
of the peptides. Analytical and semipreparative chromatography was
performed on an Agilent C18 (2.7 μm; 120 Å) reverse-phase
column (3.0 mm × 150 mm) at 1 mL/min (column 1). Preparative
HPLC was performed on an Agilent PLRP-S (8 μm; 100 Å) reverse-phase
column cross-linked polymer column (250 mm × 4.6 mm) at 10 mL/min
(column 2). HPLC for radiolabeled 99mTc-Acdien-LHRH was
on a Varian prostar 210 with a UV–visible detector and a NaI
(Tl) scintillation flow-through radiation detector controlled by and
processed by Galaxie software. Chromatography was performed on a Kinetex
column (5 μm; 100 Å) reverse-phase C18 column (250 mm ×
4.6 mm) at 1 mL/min (column 3).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Myofilament Protein Analysis by LC-MS/MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LC-MS/MS analysis was carried out using a Waters ACQUITY UPLC M-class system (Milford, MA, USA) coupled to a maXis II ETD Q-TOF mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany). Myofilament protein extracts from rat SOL and GAS skeletal muscle tissues were diluted using 0.1% formic acid, 2 mM TCEP in water. 5 μL of the diluted protein extracts (500 ng) were loaded on a home-packed PLRP column (PLRP-S, 250 mm long, 0.25 mm i.d., 10 μm particle size, 1000 Å pore size, Agilent). Myofilament proteins were eluted by a linear 50 minute gradient of 5% to 95% mobile phase B (mobile phase A: 0.1% formic acid in water, mobile phase B: 0.1% formic acid in 50:50 acetonitrile: ethanol) at a flow rate of 8 μL/min. End plate offset and capillary voltage were set at 500 and 4,500 V, respectively.
Data-dependent LC-MS/MS was performed on the rat SOL and GAS skeletal muscle myofilament protein extracts. The three most intense ions in each mass spectrum were selected and fragmented by collision-activated dissociation (CAD) with a scan rate of 2 Hz in 500–3000 m/z. The isolation window for online auto MS/MS CAD was 5–8 m/z. The collision DC bias was set from 18 to 45 eV for CAD with nitrogen as collision gas.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Top-down LC-MS/MS Protein Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Top-down LC-MS/MS was carried out by using a NanoAcquity ultra-high pressure LC system (Waters) coupled to a high-resolution maXis II quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics). 5 μL (400 ng) of total protein was injected onto a home-packed PLRP column (PLRP-S) (Agilent Technologies), 10-μm particle size, 500-μm inner diameter, 1,000 Å pore size) using an organic gradient of 5 to 95% mobile phase B (mobile phase A: 0.2% formic acid in water; mobile phase B: 0.2% formic acid in 50:50 acetonitrile:isoproponal) at a flow rate of 12 μL/min and temperature of 35 °C. Column pressure was maintained between 700–1200 psi. Mass spectra were taken at a scan rate of 0.5 Hz over 530–2000 m/z range. A total of three replicate runs were collected for each concentration between 250–1200 ng to establish instrument sensitivity and reproducibility. Samples were randomized during processing and LC-MS/MS analysis to correct for batch effects.38 Data-dependent LC-MS/MS was performed on sarcomeric protein extracts. The three most intense ions in each mass spectrum were selected and fragmented by collision-activated dissociation (CAD) with a scan rate of 2 Hz from 200–3000 m/z. The isolation window for online AutoMS/MS CAD was 10 m/z. The collision DC bias was set from 18 to 35 eV for CAD with nitrogen as the collision gas.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!