The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Spinning disk confocal unit

Manufactured by Hamamatsu Photonics
Sourced in United States

The Spinning Disk Confocal Unit is a specialized laboratory instrument designed for high-speed, high-resolution fluorescence imaging. It employs a rotating disk with an array of pinholes to provide efficient optical sectioning, allowing for the capture of sharp, three-dimensional images of biological samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using spinning disk confocal unit

1

Immunofluorescence Localization of HA-SLC26A3

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fixed cells transfected with WT or mutant HA-SLC26A3 were blocked for 45 min with 7% normal horse serum, then incubated overnight at 4°C with monoclonal anti-HA (1:300, Cell Signaling Technologies), washed three times in PBS, then incubated 1 h at room temperature with Alexa 546-coupled goat anti-rabbit Ig (Life Technologies). After three final washes, coverslips were inverted and mounted on glass slides using VECTASHIELD mounting medium (Vector Labs, Burlingame, CA). Other antigens were detected with compatible, species-specific fluorophor-coupled secondary Ig. After fixation and immunostaining of filter-grown cells as described above, the filters were excised from their frames and mounted on glass slides under coverslips with VECTASHIELD. Cells were imaged with the Zeiss LSM510 confocal fluorescence microscope or with the Nikon TE2000 inverted microscope interfaced to a PerkinElmer spinning disk confocal unit and an Orca charge-coupled device camera (Hamamatsu, Bridgewater, NJ). Image processing was with Zeiss software or (for images captured by Nikon-PerkinElmer microscope) with Slidebook (Intelligent Imaging Innovations, Denver, CO).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Automated 3D Microscopy Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data from immunohistochemistry experiments were collected on an Olympus (Center Valley, PA, USA) IX81 inverted microscope equipped with an Olympus spinning disk confocal unit, Hamamatsu EM-CCD digital camera (Bridgewater, NJ, USA), and high precision BioPrecision2 XYZ motorized stage with linear XYZ encoders (Ludl Electronic Products Ltd., Hawthorne, NJ, USA) using a 60× 1.40 N.A. SC oil immersion objective. The equipment was controlled by SlideBook 6.0 (Intelligent Imaging Innovations, Inc., Denver, CO, USA), which was the same software used for post-image processing. 3D image stacks (2D images successively captured at intervals separated by 0.25 μm in the z-dimension) that were 512 × 512 pixels (~137 × 137 μm; pixel size = 0.267 μm) were acquired over 50 percent of the total thickness of the tissue section starting at the coverslip. Importantly, imaging the same percentage, rather than the same number of microns, of the tissue section thickness controls for the potential confound of storage and/or mounting related volume differences (i.e., z-axis shrinkage). The stacks were collected using optimal exposure settings (i.e., those that yielded the greatest dynamic range with no saturated pixels), with differences in exposures normalized during image processing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

High-resolution Cortical Interneuron Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Images were acquired on an Olympus (Center Valley, PA, USA) IX81 inverted microscope equipped with an Olympus spinning disk confocal unit, a Hamamatsu EM-CCD digital camera (Bridgewater, NJ, USA), and a high-precision BioPrecision2 XYZ motorized stage with linear XYZ encoders (Ludl Electronic Products Ltd, Hawthorne, NJ, USA) using a 60x 1.40 NA SC oil immersion objective. Ten image stacks (512×512 pixels; 0.25 µm z-step) in layer 2 or 4 from each section were selected using a previously published method for systematic random sampling(24 (link)). Layer 2 or 4 was defined as 10-20% or 50-60% of the pia-to-white matter distance, respectively(25 (link)). We sampled these two layers as layer 4 contains a high density of PV interneurons(20 (link)) and prominently lower PV mRNA levels in schizophrenia(15 (link), 21 (link)), whereas layer 2 contains a high density of CR interneurons(26 (link)). The very low densities of PV interneurons in layer 2 and of CR interneurons in layer 4 precluded the sampling of these neurons. Lipofuscin for each stack was imaged using a custom fifth channel (excitation wavelength: 405nm; emission wavelength: 647nm) at a constant exposure time as previously described(27 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Spinning Disk Confocal Imaging of 3D Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were collected on an Olympus (Center Valley, PA) IX81 inverted microscope equipped with an Olympus spinning disk confocal unit, Hamamatsu EM-CCD digital camera (Bridgewater, NJ), and high precision BioPrecision2 XYZ motorized stage with linear XYZ encoders (Ludl Electronic Products Ltd., Hawthorne NJ) using a 60× 1.40 N.A. SC oil immersion objective. The equipment was controlled by SlideBook 5.0 (Intelligent Imaging Innovations, Inc., Denver, CO), which was the same software used for post-image processing. 3D image stacks (2D images successively captured at intervals separated by 0.25 µm in the z-dimension) that were 512 × 512 pixels (~ 137 × 137 µm) were acquired over 50 percent of the total thickness of the tissue section starting at the coverslip. Importantly, imaging the same percentage, rather than the same number of microns, of the tissue section thickness controls for the potential confound of storage and/or mounting related volume differences (i.e. z-axis shrinkage). The stacks were collected using optimal exposure settings (i.e., those that yielded the greatest dynamic range with no saturated pixels), with differences in exposures normalized during image processing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Spinning Disk Confocal Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were collected on an Olympus (Center Valley, PA) IX81 inverted microscope equipped with an Olympus spinning disk confocal unit, Hamamatsu EM-CCD digital camera (Bridgewater, NJ), and high precision BioPrecision2 XYZ motorized stage with linear XYZ encoders (Ludl Electronic Products Ltd., Hawthorne NJ) using a 60X 1.40 N.A. SC oil immersion objective. The equipment was controlled by SlideBook 5.0 (Intelligent Imaging Innovations, Inc., Denver, CO), which was the same software used for post-image processing. 3D image stacks (2D images successively captured at intervals separated by 0.25 μm in the z-dimension) that were 512 × 512 pixels (~ 137 × 137 μm) were acquired over 50 percent of the total thickness of the tissue section starting at the coverslip. Importantly, imaging the same percentage of the tissue section thickness rather than the same number of microns controls for the potential confound of storage and/or mounting related volume differences (i.e. z-axis shrinkage). The stacks were collected using optimal exposure settings (i.e., those that yielded the greatest dynamic range with no saturated pixels), with differences in exposures normalized during image processing.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!