The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

14 protocols using pes syringe filter

1

Phase Solubility Study of Evodiamine

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Phase solubility studies were adapted from a method introduced by Higuchi and Connors et al. [22 ]. An excess amount of evodiamine (10 mg) was added to 3 mL deionized water with various concentrations of HP-β-CD (0–400 mM) in 20 mL glass vials. The suspension solution was agitated on an IKA® RO10 magnetic stirrer (IKA, Germany) at 800 rpm and room temperature (25 °C) for 24 h and then filtered through a 0.45 μm pore size PES syringe filter (Millipore, USA) to obtain a clear solution, which was then assayed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The assay was performed on a Waters 515 HPLC pump and a Waters 2695 system equipped with a Waters 2487 dual wavelength absorbance detector at 225 nm. Ten microliters of sample was injected into a Kromasil C18 column (4.6 × 250 mm, Eka Chemicals AB, Sweden). The mobile phase consisted of acetonitrile/water (70:30, v/v) containing 0.05 % (v/v) triethylamine and 0.1 % (v/v) phosphoric acid at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min. All of the test groups were performed in triplicate. The phase solubility curve was obtained by plotting the concentration of the dissolved drug versus the concentration of HP-β-CD.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Protective and Anti-inflammatory Effects of SBH

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The WIL2-NS lymphoblastoid cell line and RAW 264.7 murine macrophages cell line were used to determine the protective effects of SBH against hydrogen peroxide (H2O2)-induced oxidative damage and the anti-inflammatory effects of SBH respectively. Both cell lines were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Rockville, MD, USA). Generally, WIL2-NS cells and RAW 264.7 cells were cultured following the protocol provided by ATCC. SBH was diluted in complete cell culture medium and was filter-sterilized using a 0.22 µm PES syringe filter (Millipore, USA) before each treatment. In general, the WIL2-NS cells (2 × 105 cells/mL) were treated with various concentrations of SBH (% v/v) for 3 days before challenging them with (30 µM) H2O2 (Sigma, USA) for 30 min. On the other hand, RAW 264.7 cells were plated at the initial density of 1 × 105 cells/mL for 18 h before being treated with different concentrations of SBH. After 2 h of incubation, lipopolysaccharide (LPS; 1 µg/mL; Sigma, USA) was added into the treatment medium and the cells were further incubated for another 22 h prior to testing for inflammation biomarkers.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Inhibiting Notch Signaling during Zebrafish Development

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DAPT treatment was carried out as previously described (Riedel-Kruse et al., 2007 (link)). 50 mM DAPT stock solution (Merck) was prepared in 100% DMSO (Sigma) and stored in a small volume at −20°C. Embryos in their chorions were transferred to 12-well plates at 2 hpf in 1.4 ml E3 medium with 20 embryos per well. 50 μM DAPT in E3 medium was prepared immediately before the treatment. To prevent precipitation, the DAPT stock solution was added into E3 medium while vortexing, and then filtered by 0.22 μm PES syringe filter (Millipore). DAPT treatment was initiated by replacing E3 medium with E3/DAPT medium at desired stage. At 9.5 (0 somite stage: ss), 11 (3 ss), 12.5 (6 ss), 14 (9 ss), or 15.5 hpf (12 ss), DAPT was washed out at least twice with fresh E3 medium + 0.03% PTU. Embryos were dechorionated and fixed at 36 hpf. All experimental steps were incubated at 28.5°C, except for short operations, for example, washing out, which were at room temperature.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Flag-Mediated Protein Immunoprecipitation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were detached using Accutase (Sigma–Aldrich) and washed 2x with ice-cold phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, Sigma–Aldrich). Cells were lysed in 1x TBS (pH 7.4) containing 0.5% NP40 and a protease/phosphatase inhibitor cocktail (Pierce, #A32959). Then the lysates were filtered through a 0.22 µm PES syringe filter (Millipore). About 10 mg lysates were immunoprecipitated with prewashed M2 anti-flag agarose resin (Sigma–Aldrich, #A2220) for 2 h at 4 °C while rotating. For Flag coimmunoprecipitation, Flag was eluted with Flag Peptide (Sigma–Aldrich, #F3290) by moving on a wheel for 20 min at 4 °C followed by a spin for 1 min at 1000 × g. The flow-through was collected and subjected to TMT labeling or Western blot analysis. The antibodies are listed in Supplementary Table 3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Lentiviral sgRNA Transduction and Selection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
sgRNA-expressing and lentiviral packaging plasmids (VSVg/Delta8.9) were transiently co-transfected into 293T cells with Lipofectamine 2000. Lentiviral supernatants were harvested at 72 h and filtered through a 0.45 µm PES syringe filter (Millipore). Transduction with lentivirally encoded sgRNAs performed as described in Supplementary Data 1 with cell line-specific protocols. 3 days following lentiviral infection, cells were started on Zeocin selection at cell line-specific concentrations (Supplementary Data 1) in order to select for sgRNA-expressing cells. Prior to gene expression analysis, uniform selection of sgRNA-infected populations was confirmed by flow cytometric analysis of the co-expressed mTagBFP2 reporter.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Isolation and Purification of Cytopathic Viruses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Swabs from the infected patients were collected in 400 µl 1XPBS buffer containing penicillin (20 IU/ml), streptomycin (100 µg/ml) and amphotericin B (250 µg/ml). They were filtered using 0.22 µm PES syringe filter (Millipore, Ireland). Approximately, 200 µl of the filtrate was mixed with DMEM1 to make the volume up to 1 ml before inoculating monolayer of A549 or Vero cells in T25 flasks. The culture flask was incubated for 1 h at 37 °C in a CO2 incubator for virus adsorption. This was followed by topping the cell monolayer with 4 ml of DMEM (1% FBS).
Plaque forming viruses were titrated and plaques were picked at 72 h (P.I.). Plaques from each cytopathic isolate were subjected to three cycles of plaque-purification and labelled as 3PP (i.e., HM3PP, PB3PP etc.). Stocks were prepared for each isolate for downstream applications.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Ultrastructural Characterization of Viral Particles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Virus produced from HEK 293T cells was centrifuged to remove cells, filtered through a 0.45 μm Polyethersulfone (PES) syringe filter (Millipore, Burlington, Massachusetts), transferred into 25 × 89 mm polyallomer ultracentrifuge tubes (Beckman Coulter, Brea, California), and ultracentrifuged in an Optima XL-100K ultracentrifuge (Beckman Coulter) using an SW28 rotor at 25,500 rpm (117,250 × g) for 2.5 h at 4°C. Following aspiration of supernatant, the pellet was fixed in FGP fixative (1.25% formaldehyde, 2.5% glutaraldehyde, and 0.03% picric acid in 0.1 M sodium cacodylate buffer (pH 7.4)) for 2 h at room temperature and stored at 4°C. Ultrathin sections (60 nm) were cut on a Reichert Ultracut-S microtome, transferred to copper grids stained with lead citrate, and observed using a JEOL 1200EX microscope with an AMT 2k charge-coupled-device camera. Images captured at 30,000× magnification were visually inspected to classify viral particles as mature, immature, eccentric, or containing 2 apparent capsids, and over 100 particles were counted per virus preparation; representative TEM images are shown in S20 and S21 Figs and summarized in S8 Table. Statistical significance versus matched WT morphology was assessed using 2-way ANOVA with Sidak multiple comparisons test with GraphPad Prism software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Preparation of Chicken Exudate for Biofilm Assays

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chicken juice was prepared as described previously (Brown et al., 2013 (link), 2014 (link)). Briefly, frozen commercially available whole chickens were purchased from UK supermarkets before thawing at room temperature. Exudate was collected, centrifuged to remove debris and sterilized by using a 0.2 μm sterile polyethersulfone (PES) syringe filter (Millipore) before aliquotting and storage at −20°C until use. Chicken juice was diluted v/v in Brucella medium for use in biofilm assays.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Zebrafish DAPT Treatment Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DAPT treatment was carried out as previously described11 (link). In brief, 50 mM DAPT stock solution (Merck) was prepared in 100% DMSO (Sigma) and stored in a small volume at −20 °C. Embryos in their chorions were transferred to 12-well plates at 2 h.p.f. in 1.6 ml E3 medium with 20 embryos per well. A total of 50 μM DAPT in E3 medium was prepared immediately before the treatment. To prevent precipitation, the DAPT stock solution was added into E3 medium while vortexing, and then filtered by 0.22 μm PES syringe filter (Millipore). DAPT treatment was initiated at dome stage (4 h.p.f.) by replacing E3 medium with E3/DAPT medium. For pulse-chase experiments, DAPT was washed out at least twice with fresh E3 medium +0.03% PTU. Embryos were dechorionated and fixed at 36 h.p.f. All experiments were incubated at 28.5 °C, except for short operations, for example, washing out, which were at room temperature.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Synthesis and Characterization of Gold Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
AuNPs of different sizes (15–38 nm) were synthesized following the Turkevich method [22 (link)]. Briefly, a solution of hydrogen tetrachloroaurate (III) hydrate (FisherScientific) in RNAse free water was stirred and heated to reflux. Then, a solution of sodium citrate tribasic dehydrate, dissolved in the same water, was added and the mixture was stirred for 15 min. After that time, the solution was allowed to cool down at room temperature and the AuNPs obtained were filtered through a 20-40 µm glass filter plate with the help of a vacuum pump to get rid of large aggregates, followed by a second filtration with a PES syringe filter of 0.22 μM (Millipore). Depending on the size of the desired AuNPs, different concentrations of reagents were used with the same final volume (110 mL). In the case of the 15 nm AuNPs, 4.15 mM of citrate and 0.864 mM of gold (ratio of 4.8) were used. For 20–21 nm AnNPs, 3.62 mM of citrate and 0.23 mM of gold (ratio of 17.7). Finally, for the 38 nm AuNPs, 0.4 mM of citrate and 0.23 mM of gold (ratio of 1.75).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!