The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Sea sand

Manufactured by Merck Group
Sourced in Germany

Sea sand is a naturally occurring mineral material composed of fine grains of rock and shell fragments. It is a common laboratory supply used as a filtration medium, abrasive, and filler in various experimental applications. The core function of sea sand is to provide a granular, non-reactive substrate for various laboratory procedures and analyses.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

10 protocols using sea sand

1

TLC Analysis of Bacterial Extracts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TLC was performed to analyze extracts of bacterial culture broth with organic solvents. Each organic extract was spotted at the bottom of a silica gel plate (20 × 20 cm; Merck) and then placed in a shallow pool of a mixture of chloroform, methanol, and acetic acid (7:2.5:0.5, v/v) as an eluent in a development chamber. The solvent was then allowed to run by capillary action until it reached to the top end of the plate. The silica gel plate was then removed and dried. Separated components were stained with a mixture (19:1, g/g) of sea sand (Merck) and iodine (Duksan, Ansan, Korea). To separate compounds, a preparatory TLC (20 × 20 cm, Merck) was performed using the same eluent. Target spots were scratched and dissolved in methanol.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Isolation of Thylakoid Membranes from Prochlorococcus

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MIT9313 was kindly provided by S. W. (Penny) Chisholm from MIT. Cells were grown in artificial seawater-based AMP1 medium, following the recommendations for large volumes (http://chisholmlab.mit.edu). Cultures (18 L) were bubbled with normal air under low intensities of white light (1.2 μmol photons m−2 s−1) for 2 months. Cells were harvested and mixed with sea sand 1:3 (Merck). All subsequent steps were performed at 4 °C. Cells were ground for 3 min in a mortar and resuspended with 5 volumes of buffer containing 50 mM Bis-Tris pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 1% sodium azide, and 1 mM phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride (PMSF). The unbroken cells and sea sand were removed by centrifugation at 3,000 g for 15 min; this supernatant was then centrifuged at 126,000 g for 20 min. The thylakoids in the pellet were resuspended in buffer containing 50 mM Bis-Tris pH 7.0, 500 mM aminocaproic acid, 2 mM CaCl2, 10% glycerol, 1% sodium azide and 1 mM PMSF (sample buffer). The total divinyl chlorophylls (DV-Chls) concentration was adjusted to 1 mg mL−1, and aliquots of 1–2 mL were rapidly frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −70 °C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Fungal DNA Extraction from Cultures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA extraction from fungal cultures was performed using the protocol described in [43 (link)] with some modifications. We used 1.5-mL Eppendorf tubes as culture vessels, containing 500 μL malt extract broth (see above, no agar added). Tubes were inoculated with a loop-full of fungal conidia and incubated horizontally at AT on a rotary shaker at 150 rpm for 2 days. Following centrifugation at 17,900×g for 5 min and washing with 500 μL of sterile HPLC grade water, mycelial pellets were mixed with sterile glass beads (1.25–1.65 mm diameter, Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany), sea sand (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), 300 μL extraction buffer (200 mM Tris-HCl (Gerbu Biotechnik, Heidelberg, Germany), 250 mM sodium chloride (Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany), 25 mM EDTA (Gerbu), 0.5% (w/v) SDS (SERVA Electrophoresis, Heidelberg, Germany), and treated in a TissueLyser (45 s; 5.5 m/s, FastPrep®-24, MP Biomedicals Germany, Eschwege, Germany) to release genomic DNA from cells. The remaining steps were performed as described in Cenis et al. [43 (link)]. Vacuum-dried genomic DNA was suspended in sterile HPLC grade water. DNA concentrations were monitored using a NanoDrop ND1000 spectrophotometer (Peqlab Biotechnologie, Erlangen, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative GC-MS Analysis of Indolic Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fresh plant material was ground with sea sand (p.a.; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) using a mortar and pestle in 50 mM MES buffer, pH 6.0 (100 µL buffer per 100 mg plant material). I3CN (25 or 20 µL of 1 nmol µL−1 in MeOH) and benzonitrile (30 or 25 µL of 100 ng µL−1 in MeOH) were added as internal standards. After 10 min incubation at room temperature, plant parts were removed by centrifugation, and the aqueous solution was extracted twice with 750 µL dichloromethane. Organic phases were passed over Na2SO4, dried in an air stream to complete dryness, dissolved in 75 µL MSTFA/pyridine (2 + 1), incubated at 70 °C for 1 h and analyzed by GC-MS. Indolic breakdown products were identified by comparison of mass spectra and retention times with those of the standard mixture. Quantification was achieved based on peak areas determined from the RIC of the molecular ions using the experimentally determined response factors (Supplementary Material Table S2).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Bacterial Metabolite Fractionation and Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Each bacterial strain was cultured separately in 1 L of TSB at 28°C for 48 h. The cultured broth was centrifuged at 10,000 × g for 20 min at 4°C to obtain supernatant which was then subjected to fractionation. Briefly, the same volume (1 L) of hexane was mixed with the supernatant to separate organic and aqueous fractions. The resulting aqueous fraction was combined with the same volume of ethyl acetate. These processes were sequentially repeated for chloroform and butanol organic solvents. Resulting organic extracts [hexane extract (HEX), ethyl acetate extract (EAX), chloroform extract (CX), and butanol extract (BX)] containing bacterial metabolites were dried with a rotary evaporator (Eyela N-1110, Rikakikai, Tokyo, Japan) at 20°C for HEX, 25°C for CX, 30°C for EAX, and 40°C for BX. After weighing dried metabolites, each extract was resuspended with 5 mL of methanol. Resulting metabolites were subjected to TLC using silica gel plates (20 cm × 20 cm; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). After developing with chloroform:methanol:acetic acid (7:2.5:0.5, v/v) as an eluent, silica gel plates were incubated with a mixture (19:1, g/g) of sea sand (Merck) and iodine (Duksan, Ansan, Korea). Spots were then visualized in a fluorescence analysis cabinet (Spectroline, CM-10, Westbury, NY, United States).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Extraction and TLC Analysis of Bacterial Metabolites

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X. hominickii was cultured in 1 L of TSB at 28°C for 48 h. After centrifuging cultured broth at 10,000 × g for 20 min at 4°C, the resulting supernatant was used for organic extraction as described by Mollah et al. [48 (link)]. Briefly, the supernatant was mixed with the same volume of hexane. After 30 min of incubation 4°C, the hexane extract (HEX) was separated from the aqueous fraction. The same procedure was sequentially used to obtain chloroform (CX), ethylacetate (EAX), and butanol (BX) extracts. Resulting organic extracts containing bacterial metabolites were dried with a rotary evaporator (Eyela N-1110, Rikakikai, Tokyo, Japan). After weighing, extracts were resuspended in methanol. TLC was performed for resulting extracts to obtain metabolites on a silica gel plate (20×20 cm; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Different compositions of chloroform and methanol (v/v) were used as eluents. The developed silica gel plate was incubated with a mixture (19:1, g/g) of sea sand (Merck) and iodine (Duksan, Ansan, Korea). Spots were visualized and marked in a fluorescence analysis cabinet (Spectroline, CM-10, Westbury, NY, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterization of Purified Sea Sand

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The porous material used was the commercially available Merck purified sea sand with an average particle size of 100–300 µm (product no. 1.07711.5000). The sand was already purified by the manufacturer with acidic treatment and calcination. In another treatment step the sea sand was put in MilliQ water with a volume to mass ratio of 2:1. A small aliquot of 100 µL HNO3 was added to the suspension (pH ~3–4), which was then vigorously agitated for a few seconds. The turbid supernatant was poured out of the vessel a few seconds after agitation, giving enough time for the biggest particles to settle leaving the fines in suspension. This procedure was repeated 7-10 times until the supernatant appeared clear and a stable and a neutral pH was reached. The sand was then dried in an oven at 105 °C for at least 24 h (this sample is later referred as cleaned sand; Table 3). The N2-BET surface area of the powder was equal to 0.55 ± 0.02 m2 g−1. The mineralogical composition of the sand powder was characterized via XRD and XRF. The porosity and petro-physical properties of the compacted sand were determined with mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP, before the formation of a precipitation front) and µ-CT (before and after the formation of a precipitation front).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Pollen Transcriptome Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For each sample, pollen grains were isolated from anthers collected from 60 flowers, at developmental stages A-4 and A-3, as detailed above for protein extraction. The released pollen grains were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and kept frozen at -80oC until use. Pollen grains were ground to a fine powder using liquid nitrogen and sea sand (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and total RNA was extracted using the Tri reagent (Sigma-Aldrich, Israel). RNA was treated with TURBO DNase (AB Applied Biosystems, Ambion, CA, United States) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Two micrograms of total RNA were used for cDNA synthesis, using Maxima first-strand cDNA synthesis kit (Thermo Scientific3) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Each qPCR reaction was performed with three biological replicates, each with three technical replicates. The PCRs were performed with Platinum SYBR Green qPCR Super Mix-UDG (Invitrogen, Germany) in a Rotor-Gene 6000 cycler (Qiagen, Germany). PCR products were analyzed using Rotor Gene Series 6000 software version 1.7 (Qiagen, Germany). Values in each sample were normalized to the level of 18S ribosomal gene as a reference gene (Frank et al., 2009 (link)). All primers used are listed in Supplementary Table S13.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Phytochemical Analysis of Okra

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Okra (mature and ready to be consumed) was purchased from local supermarkets in 2019 when the study is conducted. Azinobis-3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid (ABTS), 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), ascorbic acid, Acarbose, HPLC grade water, sea sand and formic acid were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Singapore). All cell culture reagents, including trypsin, MCDB-131 media, Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS), Attachment Factor (AF), 0.4% trypan blue and L-glutamine acid were purchased from Thermofisher Scientific (Singapore). All other reagents used throughout the experiments in this study were of standard analytical grade.
The whole okra plants were washed and dried before they were separated into various parts, consisting of the Seeds, Outer Skin and Inner Skin. Subsequently, the various okra parts were oven-dried at 40 °C for 24 h [23 (link)]. The samples were crushed using mortar and pestle after being cooled down to generate a more homogeneous and representative sample. Samples were sieved individually to separate into following particle sizes: below 0.3 mm, between 0.3 mm and 2.8 mm, and above 2.8 mm. Fine samples with particle size below 0.3 mm was used for chemical analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Accelerated Solvent Extraction of Algae

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Extractions of algae species were performed using an accelerated solvent extractor (ASE, 350, Dionex Corp, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) equipped with a solvent controlled unit. Five different solvents (hexane, ethanol, ethyl acetate, acetone and ethanol 50%) at 3 different temperatures (80 °C, 120 °C, 160 °C) were tested. Extractions were performed in triplicate in 10 mL extractions cells and 100 bar. The amount of 1 g of algae was loaded into the stainless steel cell with sea sand (thin grain, particle size 250–300 μm, Sigma-Aldrich, Madrid, Spain) above and below the sample to avoid any void spaces. Then, the extraction cell was placed into the carrousel and the automatic extraction sequence began with the loading of the cell into the oven. When the cell was heated to the pre-set extraction temperature, the cell was pressurized for 10 min and then allowed to flow the extract into the collection vial. The solvent total volume used was 20 mL.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!