The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Double sided adhesive

Manufactured by 3M
Sourced in Sao Tome and Principe

Double-sided adhesive is a type of lab equipment that features two adhesive surfaces, one on each side. It is designed to securely bond two materials together. The primary function of this product is to provide a strong, durable, and reversible adhesive connection between various lab components or materials.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

5 protocols using double sided adhesive

1

Epidermal Sheet Isolation and Staining

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Epidermal sheets were prepared as previously described (Mohammed et al., 2016 (link)). Briefly, epidermal side of shaved defatted flank skin or splitted ear skin was affixed to slides with double-sided adhesive (3M, St. Paul, MN). Slides were incubated in 10 mM EDTA in PBS for 90 min at 37°C, followed by physical removal of the dermis. The epidermal sheets were fixed in 4% PFA at RT for 15 min. The eidermal sheets were blocked with PBS containing 0.1% tween-20, 2% BSA and 2% rat serum or rabbit serum for 1 hour at RT before staining 1hour with antibodies at RT in PBS containing 0.1% tween-20 and 0.5% BSA. The slides were mounted with ProLong™ Gold Antifade Mountant (Thermo). Images were captured on an IX83 fluorescent microscope (Olympus Tokyo, Japan) using a x10 objective; image analysis was performed using cellSens Dimension software (Olympus). For enumeration of cells, three images from distant sites within an epidermal sheet from a mouse were counted (total 3 mm2) manually or automatically in ImageJ64 after image processing by Adobe Photoshop (version 6) and the average number per mm2 epidermis was calculated as representative of the epidermal sheet. Anti-CD45.2 (104), CD8α (53–6.7), Thy1.1 (OX-7), MHCII (M5/114.15.2), hNGFR (ME20.4), YFP (FM264G) were purchased from Biolegend.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Epidermal Isolation and Immune Cell Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Epidermal sheets were prepared as previously described [25 (link)]. Shaved defatted flank skin was affixed to slides with double-sided adhesive (3M, St. Paul, MN). Slides were incubated in 10 mM EDTA in PBS for 90 min at 37°C, followed by physical removal of the dermis. The epidermal sheets were fixed in 4% PFA at room temperature (RT) for 30 min. The epidermal sheets were blocked with PBS containing 0.1% tween-20, 2% BSA and 2% rat serum for 1 hours at RT before staining overnight with Alexa Fluor 488–conjugated anti–GFP, Alexa Fluor 594–conjugated anti–mouse I-A/I-E and Alexa Fluor 647– conjugated anti-TCR γ/δ antibody in PBS containing 0.1% tween-20 and 0.5% BSA. Images were captured on a IX83 fluorescent microscope (Olympus Tokyo, Japan) using a x10 objective; image analysis was performed using cell Sens Dimension software (Olympus). Both LC and DETC in epidermis were counted either by ImageJ software or manually in a blinded fashion.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Epidermal Sheet Isolation and Imaging

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Epidermal sheets were prepared as previously described (Mohammed et al., 2016 (link)). Briefly, shaved defatted flank skin was affixed to slides with double-sided adhesive (3M, St. Paul, MN). Slides were incubated in 10 mM EDTA in PBS for 90 min at 37°C, followed by physical removal of the dermis. The epidermal sheets were fixed in 4% PFA at RT for 30 min. The eidermal sheets were blocked with PBS containing 0.1% tween-20, 2% BSA and 2% rat serum for 2 h at RT before staining overnight with antibodies in PBS containing 0.1% tween-20 and 0.5% BSA. Images were captured on a IX83 fluorescent microscope (Olympus Tokyo, Japan) using a x10 objective; image analysis was performed using cellSens Dimension software (Olympus).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Lateral Flow Assay with Fluorescent Readout

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Double sided adhesive (3M, Maplewood, MN) with 1.5 mm diameter holes was applied to the surface of a wicking layer (ShamWow®, Wallingford, CT). 2 mm disks of functionalized Fusion 5 filters were carefully adhered to the wicking layer, centered over the 1.5 mm holes in the adhesive. 1 mL of 1x PBS (pH 5) with varying concentrations of synthetic proviral DNA target was applied to the filters using a 1 mL syringe. The solution was wicked through the filters into the bottom layer (Figure S3).
The filters were then moved to Double sided adhesive on the surface of custom 3D printed rings (Figure 1c, black rings) and dried for 10 minutes in the custom drying chambers (Figure 1b, blue component). H1 and H2 conjugated with Cy3 and Cy5, respectively, were diluted to 5 nM concentrations in 0.5X SSC with 10 mM MgCl2, 0.05% Tween 20, and 6% PEG (brought to pH 8 using Tris base) and were applied to the paper disks as 5 μL droplets. The PEG concentration was increased in these experiments to 6% due to further optimization of the crowding buffer concentrations. The reactions were fully evaporated for 60 minutes in the custom drying chambers and processed using the fluorescence microscope and FRET cube as described earlier with the exception that the images were taken at a gain of 4 and 500 ms exposure and images were converted to RGB color prior to analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Lateral Flow Assay with Fluorescent Readout

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Double sided adhesive (3M, Maplewood, MN) with 1.5 mm diameter holes was applied to the surface of a wicking layer (ShamWow®, Wallingford, CT). 2 mm disks of functionalized Fusion 5 filters were carefully adhered to the wicking layer, centered over the 1.5 mm holes in the adhesive. 1 mL of 1x PBS (pH 5) with varying concentrations of synthetic proviral DNA target was applied to the filters using a 1 mL syringe. The solution was wicked through the filters into the bottom layer (Figure S3).
The filters were then moved to Double sided adhesive on the surface of custom 3D printed rings (Figure 1c, black rings) and dried for 10 minutes in the custom drying chambers (Figure 1b, blue component). H1 and H2 conjugated with Cy3 and Cy5, respectively, were diluted to 5 nM concentrations in 0.5X SSC with 10 mM MgCl2, 0.05% Tween 20, and 6% PEG (brought to pH 8 using Tris base) and were applied to the paper disks as 5 μL droplets. The PEG concentration was increased in these experiments to 6% due to further optimization of the crowding buffer concentrations. The reactions were fully evaporated for 60 minutes in the custom drying chambers and processed using the fluorescence microscope and FRET cube as described earlier with the exception that the images were taken at a gain of 4 and 500 ms exposure and images were converted to RGB color prior to analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!