The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Sense flex m coil

Manufactured by Philips
Sourced in Germany

The SENSE-Flex-M coil is a multi-channel flexible radio frequency (RF) coil designed for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) applications. It is intended to provide uniform signal reception over a wide field of view. The coil features multiple receiver channels to enable parallel imaging techniques for faster image acquisition. The SENSE-Flex-M coil is compatible with Philips MRI systems, but its detailed specifications and intended use are not provided in this unbiased, factual description.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using sense flex m coil

1

Canine MRI for Prostate Artery Embolization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) examinations were performed in all dogs with a 1.5 T system (Intera; Philips Medical Systems) before PAE as baseline data and 1 week, 2 weeks and 1 month after PAE to assess the morphologic responses and measure the PV. Under general anesthesia, the animals were placed in a supine position with a SENSE-Flex-M coil (Philips Medical Systems) around the lower abdomen for image acquisition. A typical MRI examination included axial T1-weighted turbo spin-echo and T2-weighted turbo spin-echo images with a field of view of 14 × 14 cm and a 3 mm section thickness in a 232 × 232 matrix. An additional contrast enhanced T1-weighted imaging was also obtained by intravenous administration of a bolus of 0.1 mmol/kg gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist®; Shering AG). All the imaging data were collected for subsequent imaging analysis by two investigators (F.S and V.L.C).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Masseter Muscle T2 Mapping Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MR image acquisition was performed at Fukuoka Dental Collage. All the examinations were performed on a 1.5 T scanner (Intera Achieva nova dual; Philips Medical Systems, Eindhoven, the Netherlands) that used a sensitivity‐encoding SENSE‐Flex‐M coil. The muscle functional acquisitions were contiguous 4‐mm axial scans collected from the cricoid to the hard palate utilizing a spin‐echo sequence with a repetition time (TR) of 2000 ms and dual echo times (TE) of 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, and 80 ms. We obtained the T2 maps using the fast spin‐echo (FSE) sequence before, during, immediately after, and 20 min after clenching.
T2‐weighted MR images were obtained before and immediately after each motor task (at rest and after clenching) to measure any changes in the T2 values of the masseter muscles induced by clenching (Figure 1a,c). An average T2 of the anatomic region of interest (ROI) was determined by digitizing the region of the enhanced masseter muscle, which provided a computer‐generated average of T2. Digitizing was performed by one investigator (M.A.). Muscle segmentation was carried out using Osirix (v.3.9.4 32‐bit), a software program for digital imaging and communication in medicine.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Multimodal Characterization of SPIONs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MRI experiments were performed on a 3T clinical MR scanner (Philips Achieva, Best, The Netherlands) and images were acquired using SENSE-flex-M coil (Philips Achieva, Best, The Netherlands). From MRI tests, R1 and R2 relaxation rates and corresponding r1 and r2 relaxivities were calculated [44 (link)]. MPI measurements were performed using the Philips pre-clinical demonstrator system and relevant parameters of the SPION were determined including the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the point spread function (PSF). In order to evaluate hyperthermia performance, a custom-build setup (Trumpf Hüttinger, Freiburg, Germany) was employed and the heating efficiency of the different SPION formulations under an alternating magnetic field (AMF) was quantified using the specific absorption rate (SAR), which provides a measure of the magnetic power absorbed per unit mass of the magnetic material (see Additional file 1 for more details).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

MRI Imaging of Vascular Stents

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To create background MRI signal, the stents were placed in a plastic holder containing diluted contrast medium. The mixture consisted of the 1.0 mmol/mL gadolinium based contrast agent gadobutrol (Gadovist, Bayer Healthcare, Berlin, Germany) and 2% Agar solution in a 1:500 ratio. No in-stent balloon was used for MRI. The plastic holder containing the great vessel stents was placed in the SENSE Flex-M coil (Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands) under an angle of approximately 30 degrees (Fig 3). Images were acquired using a 1.5 Tesla Achieva MRI scanner (Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands). The following acquisition sequences were used: a multi-slice T2-weigthed turbo spin echo, an RF-spoiled three-dimensional T1-weighted Fast Field Echo and a balanced turbo field echo 3D. An overview of all MRI sequences and acquisition parameters is provided in S1 Table. The MRI sequences were acquired once.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Brain and Spine

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A standard anesthetic protocol was used (isoflurane inhalation narcotic 1.5%−2.5%, premedication with diazepam 0.1 mg/kg, and propofol 6 mg/kg). Image acquisition was performed using a 1.0 Tesla Scanner (Gyroscan Intera, Phillips, Hamburg, Germany) with a SENSE-flex-M coil placed bilaterally. Sagittal, transverse, and dorsal scans of the entire brain and the cervical spine were performed. T2-weighted (T2-Turbospin echo, TE/TR: 108/8,627 ms, averages: 4; slice thickness: 2.0 mm, spacing: 2.2 mm, acquisition matrix: 288 × 288; flip angle: 90°; voxel size: 0.4 × 0.4 × 2.2 mm, acquisition time: 16 min) sections of the brain were used for further investigations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Standardized Prostate MRI Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MRI was performed on a 1.5-T scanner (Gyroscan Intera 1.5-T, Philips Medical Systems, Best, The Netherlands) using a pelvic phased-array coil (SENSE-Flex-M coil, Philips Medical Systems). According to the standard prostate MRI protocol at our institution, the images were obtained including transverse T2-weighted [repetition time/echo time (TR/TE), 5,900–6,100/120 ms; section thickness, 4 mm; intersection gap, 1 mm; field of view, 150 × 150 mm; matrix, 512 × 512; number of excitations, 3] and T1-weighted fast spin-echo sequences (TR/TE, 425–600/8–10 ms; section thickness, 4 mm; intersection gap, 1 mm; field of view, 150 × 150 mm; matrix, 512 × 512; number of excitations, 3). DWI was performed using a single-shot echo-planar imaging technique (b value = 0 and 1,000 s/mm2) in the axial plane (TR/TE, 2,600–4,000/81 ms; section thickness, 5 mm; intersection gap, 1 mm; field of view, 220 × 220 mm; matrix, 256 × 256; number of excitations, 6 or 14).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!