The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Bipap a30

Manufactured by Philips
Sourced in United States

The BiPAP A30 is a positive airway pressure (PAP) device designed for the treatment of sleep-disordered breathing. It provides bilevel positive airway pressure, which means it delivers different levels of pressure during inhalation and exhalation. The device is intended to assist with respiratory function, but a detailed description of its intended use or interpretation of its capabilities is not provided.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

3 protocols using bipap a30

1

Chronic NIV Initiation for Patients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patients randomised to in-hospital initiation were initiated on chronic NIV according to the regular procedures on our pulmonary ward. We used a bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP)-set ventilator (BiPAP A40 and BiPAP A30, Philips Respironics, Murrysville, Pennsylvania, USA) and adjusted the settings to achieve normocapnia during the night or at least a reduction in nocturnal mean PtCO2of 20% compared with the first night of spontaneous breathing.29 (link) The initiation period was finished and the patient was discharged home once he or she could sleep at least 6 consecutive hours with the ventilator and the gas exchange goals were achieved. When necessary, our specialised nurse joined the patients at home to instal the ventilator.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Remote Initiation of Chronic NIV

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Patients randomised to home initiation were initiated on chronic NIV completely at their home, using telemedicine. Ventilator data were retrieved via a GPRS system clicked on the back of the ventilator (BiPAP A40 and BiPAP A30, Philips Respironics), which sent data to an online platform (Encore Anywhere, Philips Respironics). Changes in ventilator settings could be made remotely. Also, PtCO2 was measured (SenTec DM, Software V-STATS V.4.0, SenTec AG, Therwil, Switzerland) and these data were retrieved remotely via a high-end ambulatory remote monitoring device (Dyna-vision, Techmedic International, Broek op Langedijk, the Netherlands). The specialised nurse visited the patient at day 1 to instal the equipment, explain all procedures, and to practice with NIV, and the last day to return the telemedicine/measurement devices and finish the initiation period. For a detailed explanation of the home initiation, see online repository.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Comparative CPAP and BiPAP Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Study participants were invited to the outpatient clinic once. Patients were fitted with appropriately sized nose mask and were instructed to ensure their mouths remained closed during CPAP/BiPAP application to prevent leakage. A short protocol (±20 min) was followed to acclimatise the participant with CPAP and BiPAP on the ventilator (BiPAP A30, Philips Respironics, Murrysville, PA).
After the acclimatisation protocol, the following settings were administered with room air for 10 min each, with 5 min spontaneous breathing in between: baseline (spontaneous breathing without CPAP/BiPAP), CPAP with a level of 5, 10 and 15 cmH2O (CPAP-5, CPAP-10 and CPAP-15, respectively) and BiPAP with an inspiratory pressure of 14 cmH2O and expiratory pressure of 10 cmH2O with a lower (7 breaths/min) and higher (1 breath/min above the spontaneous breathing frequency) back-up respiratory rate (BURR). The spontaneous breathing frequency was determined while administering BiPAP with the lower BURR. Initially, the BURR during BiPAP with a higher BURR was set at 1 breath per minute above this established spontaneous breathing frequency, with the option for adjustment in case the patient continued to initiate breaths.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!