The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Dig application manual for filter hybridization

Manufactured by Roche
Sourced in Germany

The DIG Application Manual for Filter Hybridization is a technical guide that provides instructions and information for the use of the DIG labeling and detection system in filter hybridization applications. The manual covers the basic principles, procedures, and considerations for using the DIG system to label and detect target sequences on membranes or filters.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

13 protocols using dig application manual for filter hybridization

1

Analyzing VviTPS10 Expression via Molecular Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A DIG probe targeting VviTPS10 was obtained through PCR amplification of an 862 bp internal region of the coding sequence followed by DIG labeled as described in the DIG Application Manual for Filter Hybridization (Roche, Germany) and diluted to 8.2 ng/mL in DIG Easy Hyb. The same probe solution was used for both Southern and Northern blotting at the appropriate temperatures described in the DIG Application Manual for Filter Hybridization (Roche, Germany).
For Southern blot analysis genomic DNA was isolated from MA, SB, and SH using the method described by Lovato et al. (2012) (link), followed by single digests of 10 μg gDNA using BamHI, EcoRI and XbaI restriction enzymes (Thermo Fisher Scientific, United States). Southern blotting was performed as described in the DIG Application Manual for Filter Hybridization (Roche, Germany).
Total RNA was isolated from ±100 mg tissue for EL-18 and EL-26 stages from MA, SB, and SH using the method described by Reid et al. (2006) (link). RNA was selectively purified using the RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen) according to the RNA clean-up protocol described in the product manual. RNA samples were separated on a 1.2% formaldehyde agarose (FA) gel followed by Northern blot analysis according to the DIG Application Manual for Filter Hybridization (Roche, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Genomic DNA Analysis of Transgenic Orchids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA isolated from wild-type and 35S:DOAP1 transgenic orchids was digested by EcoRI for 16 h, resolved on 1.2% (w/v) agarose gels, and then transferred onto nylon membranes. Blots were hybridized overnight with the specific digoxigenin-labeled DNA, washed and detected in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions (DIG Application Manual for Filter Hybridization, Roche) as previously reported (Yu and Goh, 2000b (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Genomic DNA and RNA Extraction for Southern Blot

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell cultures at exponential stage were collected and genomic DNA was extracted using MasterPure™ Yeast DNA purification kit (Epicentre, Madison, WI, USA), while RNA was extracted as described previously [6 (link)]. The concentrations of extracted DNA or RNA samples were determined with NanoDrop® ND-1000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Wilmington, DE, USA) and their integrity were checked by agarose gel electrophoresis.
For Southern blot analysis, 10 μg of genomic DNA was digested with PvuI at 37°C for about 24 hrs and resolved by electrophoresis in a 0.8% agarose gel. Southern hybridization and detection procedures were performed using DIG (digoxigenin)-High Prime DNA Labeling and Detection kit in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions (DIG Application Manual for Filter Hybridization, Roche Diagnostics, Indiana, IA, USA). The probes were amplified by PCR labeling using DIG DNA labeling mix, with primers Rt100 and Rt101 used to amplify a fragment targeting the 5′ flanking sequence of KU70, and Rt083 and Rt084 specific to the 5′ flanking sequence of CAR2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantitative Northern Blot Analysis of GFP

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from infiltrated regions of the leaves using the guanidium thiocynate extraction method [45 ]. A measure of 30 μg of total RNA from each plant sample was resolved on a formamide agarose gel to check for GFP transcript and small RNA. The RNA was transferred on Hybond N+ membranes (Amersham Pharmacia, Peapack, NJ, USA). Digoxigenin-11-dUTP (DIG) labelled DNA probes were generated via PCR labelling using the PCR DIG Probe Synthesis kit (Roche, Basel, Switzerland, catalogue No. 11636090910). A measure of 10 ng of purified plasmid DNA containing the full length GFP DNA was used as the PCR template and amplified with GFP forward (TCAAGGACGACGGGAACTACAAG) and reverse (GTGGTGGTGGCTAGCTTTGTA) primers. Northern blot analysis was performed at 50 °C using the protocol provided in the DIG Application Manual for Filter Hybridization (Roche). Following the hybridization, the blot was washed at 55 °C and probe detection was performed according to the manufacturers’ protocol using the DIG luminescent detection kit (Roche). The intensity of the individual bands was measured with respect to the background, and the integrated density value (IDV) was calculated using Alphaimager. Each experiment was performed in triplicates and the average values were used for plotting.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Northern Blot Analysis of Plant Viruses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For northern blot analysis, total RNA was extracted from leaf tissues as described previously [37 (link)]. Total RNA (5 µg) was separated on 1% formaldehyde agarose gels, transferred to positively-charged nylon membranes (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany), and probed with digoxigenin-labeled specific RNA probes for the RNA1 and RNA2 3′-untranslated region of TRV (6548–6789 nt of RNA1 and 1860–2101 nt of RNA2), and for the 3′-end region of PVX (5875–6403 nt of PVX cDNA sequence in pgR107 vector). For tissue blot hybridization, fresh cross-sections of four non-inoculated leaf petioles or stems were squash blotted on positively-charged nylon membranes (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany), and blots were hybridized with the digoxigenin-labeled RNA probes mentioned above. The hybridization conditions used were those recommended by the manufacturer (DIG Application Manual for Filter Hybridization, Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). Membranes were exposed to X-ray film (X-Omat AR, Kodak, Rochester, NY, USA) and developed following a conventional photographic process.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

HBx Gene Expression Analysis by Blot Techniques

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Southern blot and Northern blot analyses were performed mainly following the protocol described in “DIG Application Manual for Filter Hybridization” from Roche. Briefly, the RNA or intracellular core-associated HBV DNA extracted from Huh-7 cells were separated on a 1% agarose gel in 0.01 M Na+-phosphate buffer (pH 7.0 for Northern blot) or in 0.5X TAE buffer (20 mM Tris-base, 10 mM acetic acid, and 0.5 mM EDTA for Southern blot). The gel was blotted onto a positively charged nylon membrane (Cat: 11417240001, Roche), which was then hybridized with a digoxigenin (DIG)-labeled probe encompassing the HBx coding region (nt 1372–1833) that was generated using the DIG PCR Probe Synthesis kit (Cat: 1636090910, Roche). After 16 h of hybridization at 45°C (Southern blot) or 52°C (Northern blot), the membrane was washed following the instructions and blocked with 1X DIG blocking buffer (Cat: 11096176001, Roche) for 30 min and then incubated with alkaline phosphatase (AP)-conjugated anti-DIG antibody (1:10,000 dilution, Cat: 11093274910, Roche). The signals were detected by chemiluminescence using the CDP-Star substrate (Cat: 2041677, Roche).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

RNA Expression Analysis of Colorectal Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
RNA (5 μg) from the LS174T cell line, a colorectal adenocarcinoma sample and a normal colonic mucosa sample were subjected to agarose gel (1.2%) electrophoresis using MOPS electrophoresis buffer and 2% formaldehyde in the gel, according to the “DIG Application Manual for Filter Hybridization” (Roche). A digoxigenin (DIG)-labeled RNA size standard was analyzed in parallel. RNA was blotted onto a positively charged nylon membrane by capillary transfer and hybridized to 2.5 pmol of four PHGR1-specific DIG-labeled DNA hybridization probes, according to the same DIG application manual. The sequences of the hybridization probes were: 5′-GGA GTA AGA GCA GGG AAT ACC TGA GAG TGC AGA GCA GGG GCA GGA AGT C-3′, 5’-GCC CGC AGT GAC CTG GAG GAT GGC CAT GCC CCC CAC AGT G-3′, 5’-GGC CCT GGA CCA TGG TGG GGG GGT GGC CCG CAG G-3′ and 5’-GGC CTC ATT CCA GGT CAG CTG GGC AAT TCT CTC AGG CTT GCC-3′. The hybridization signals were detected by an alkaline phosphatase-conjugated DIG antibody according to the application manual.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Southern Blotting of Rubber Tree Genes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Southern blotting was conducted by using Dig Application Manual for Filter Hybridization (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). H. brasiliensis genomic DNA was extracted from the leaves of rubber tree and digested with BamH I, EcoR I, Hind III, and Xba I (Thermo Scientific, Guangzhou, China). Ten μg of each digestion product was electrophoresed on a 0.8% agarose gel at 1 V/cm overnight, and then transferred onto a positively charged nylon membrane (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) through capillary transfer by 20× SSC (saline sodium citrate) for about 12 h. UV (ultraviolet) crosslink of the DNA to the filter was at a strength of 90,000 μJ/m2. The cross-linked filters were hybridized with ~350 bp Dig PCR labeled probes of each REF and SRPP genes, respectively. The primers for the probes are listed in Table S2. Hybridization was performed at 42 °C and the probes were washed at a low stringent condition. DNA blots were visualized by LAS4000mini (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Genomic DNA Preparation and Southern Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Genomic DNA was prepared from individual samples by established methods (40 ) with slight modifications. Restriction enzymes were purchased from New England Biolabs, Inc., and used according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Samples were subjected to electrophoresis in 1% or 1.2% agarose gels. Denaturation, transfer to nylon membranes, digoxygenin-labeled probe preparation, and hybridization were performed as described in the DIG Application Manual for Filter Hybridization published by Roche Diagnostics. Templates for probe labeling were prepared using the PCR DIG Probe Synthesis Kit (Roche Diagnostics). PCR products for probe preparation were amplified from genomic DNA or from a plasmid carrying the entire HO promoter, using primers shown in SI Appendix, Table S4.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Southern Blot Analysis of Lily MYB Gene

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Southern blot analysis was carried out using the DIG Application Manual for Filter Hybridization (Roche, Switzerland). Genomic DNA was extracted from lily anthers using the CTAB method and digested with BamHI, EcoRI, HindIII, and XbaI. Ten μg of each digested product was separated on an agarose gel (0.8%) and then transferred onto a positively charged nylon membrane (Roche) by capillary transfer using 20×SSC buffer; the DNA was then UV-cross linked to the lter at a strength of 70,000 μj m -2 . The lter was then prehybridized and hybridized against the DIG-labeled full sequence of the MYB gene probe. The primers for the probe were: LoMYB20sFU, 5'-GGACCCTCCAAACATTCTATATCTATCT-3' and LoMYB20sFL, 5'-CAGCATGAAAAGCAATAAAGTTCAATTAC-3'. Hybridization was performed at 42 o C and the probe was washed at 60 o C. DNA blots were visualized following lm development (FUJI Photo Film, Japan) for 1 h.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!