The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Sigmastat v4

Manufactured by Grafiti LLC
Sourced in United States

SigmaStat v4.0 is a software application used for statistical analysis of data. It provides a range of statistical tests and tools to help researchers and analysts interpret their findings. The software is designed to be user-friendly and offers a straightforward interface for data input, analysis, and visualization.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

9 protocols using sigmastat v4

1

Evaluating Legionella in Ships

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analysed using Microsoft Excel 2010 (Microsoft Corp., USA) and SigmaStat v. 4.0 (Systat Software Inc., USA). The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare medians. Linear regression analysis was used to compare ship's age and Legionella culture results. Differences were considered statistically significant when P < 0•05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Jaw and Neck Muscle Activity Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The assumption of normality of the data obtained for the first peak frequency of jaw and neck muscle activities, and the power, gain, phase, and coherence in the first peak frequency were tested by Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Paired t‐test or Wilcoxon signed‐ranks test were used to compare the data of the examined muscles (C‐Mm and/or NC‐Mm, C‐/NC‐Ta, C‐/NC‐AD, C‐/NC‐SCM) between soft and hard gum (Häggman‐Henrikson et al., 2013 (link); Iguchi et al., 2015 (link); Takada et al., 1994 (link)). All statistical analyzes were performed using SigmaStat, v. 4.0 (Systat Software, Inc, CA, USA) and results were considered to be significant when the value for comparison was less than 5%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Parasitoid Pupal Weight and Morphology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Comparisons of pupal weights between the two rearing cohorts were compared for each species using paired t-tests (p < 0.05). After normality testing (Shapiro–Wilk test), comparisons between pupal weights for each species were tested for Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA on ranks and comparison between means were made using Dunn’s Method. For each parasitoid species, comparisons of tibia length of females reared from each fly host species were made by ANOVA. Data were tested for normality (Shapiro–Wilk test) and if data were not normal, Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA on ranks was conducted with means comparisons using Dunn’s Method.
Attributes of host mortality and parasitism were compared for each parasitoid species between host fly species used. For each comparison, data were tested for normality (Shapiro–Wilk test), then data analyzed either with ANOVA followed by means comparisons using Student Neuman Keul’s test, or if not normal, Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA on ranks and comparison between means were made using Dunn’s Method. Analyses were conducted using SigmaStat v. 4.0 (Systat Software, San Jose, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Extracellular Recordings of Nerve Conduction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
APs were recorded extracellularly using a low-noise AC differential amplifier (DAM 80, World Precision Instruments, Sarasota, FL). The activity was monitored on-line, filtered (0.3 to 10 kHz), amplified (x10,000), digitized at 20 kHz using a 1401 interface (CED, Cambridge, UK), and stored on a PC. APs were discriminated off-line using Spike 2 software (CED). The root-mean-square (RMS) value of pre-stimulus noise was calculated and 5 times that value was set as the detection threshold for AP spikes. The time at which the stimulus first exceeded the threshold was deemed as the onset of the AP. To avoid erroneous discrimination, we only studied single-unit APs temporarily separated from other neural activities by at least 3 msec in any record. CDs were measured as the time between the onset of stimulus artifact and the onset of recorded APs. CV was computed from the CD and the distance between stimulating and recording electrodes. Axial stretch was quantified by stretch ratio λ (i.e., the deformed nerve length divided by the in vitro nerve length at the zero-stretch state). The zero-stretch nerve length was measured as the distance between the proximal and distal ligatures (Fig. 7A). Data were presented as means ± standard error (SE). Statistical analysis was performed using SigmaStat v4.0 (Systat Software, San Jose, CA). Differences were considered significant when p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying Neuronal GCaMP6f Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Extracted GCaMP6f signals in the form of pixel intensity (0–255) from individual DRG neurons were normalized by the pre-stimulus intensity. Peak GCaMP6f transients were determined when the signal increased by 3% within 200 mSec. The duration of the GCaMP6f transients were determined by the measuring temporal width of the signal at 25% of the peak intensity. Proportions of afferent classes were compared by Chi-square test using SigmaStat v4.0 (Systat software, Inc., San Jose, CA). P < 0.05 was considered significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying Visceromotor Response to Colorectal Distension

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
EMG activities evoked by CRD were recorded from the abdominal oblique musculature, digitized at 2000 Hz, and processed off-line using customized MATLAB scripts. The EMG signals were rectified for calculating the area under the curve (AUC), which was used to evaluate the level of VMR to CRD (27 (link)). VMR evoked by CRD was quantified as the AUC values during the 5 s CRD subtracted by the AUC of the 5 s pre-distending baseline recording. Results are expressed as means ± standard error (SE). One-way ANOVA and Tukey's repeated post-hoc comparisons were performed as appropriate using SigmaStat v4.0 (Systat Software, San Jose, CA, United States). Differences were considered significant when p < 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Evaluating Avian Challenge Trials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two challenge trials were conducted, and 24 to 25 birds were used for each group per experiment for a total of 49 to 50 birds per group. The data from both challenge trials were combined for statistical analysis and presentation. The data were analyzed by ANOVA using SigmaStat v4.0 (Systat Software Inc., San Jose, CA) with significance at P ≤ 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Calcium Signaling in Cardiomyocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the data are presented as mean value ± standard error of the means (SEM) unless otherwise noted. Following a test for normality, either Student’s unpaired t test (for two groups) or one/two-way ANOVA (for more than two groups) was used for normally distributed data (Figs 2, 3 and 7). Data with a non-normal distribution was analysed with a Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA within each genotype (Ca2+ spark full width, half-maximum (FWHM), full duration, half maximum (FDHM) and amplitude, Fig. 4) or with Friedman’s repeated measures ANOVA across all groups (Ca2+ spark frequency, Figs 4 and 6) with a corrected Bonferonni post hoc test for multiple comparisons (SigmaStat v 4.1 (Systat Software, Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) and SPSS Statistics v 26 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Calcium Signaling in Cardiomyocytes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All the data are presented as mean value ± standard error of the means (SEM) unless otherwise noted. Following a test for normality, either Student’s unpaired t test (for two groups) or one/two-way ANOVA (for more than two groups) was used for normally distributed data (Figs 2, 3 and 7). Data with a non-normal distribution was analysed with a Kruskal-Wallis one-way ANOVA within each genotype (Ca2+ spark full width, half-maximum (FWHM), full duration, half maximum (FDHM) and amplitude, Fig. 4) or with Friedman’s repeated measures ANOVA across all groups (Ca2+ spark frequency, Figs 4 and 6) with a corrected Bonferonni post hoc test for multiple comparisons (SigmaStat v 4.1 (Systat Software, Inc., San Jose, CA, USA) and SPSS Statistics v 26 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!