The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

190 protocols using matlab r2015a

1

Dichoptic Stimulus Presentation and Eye Tracking

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Dichoptic stimulus presentation and the data collection were performed using MATLAB R2015a (The Mathworks, Inc) with Psychtoolbox version 3.0.1248 (link)–50 (link) and the Eyelink Toolbox51 (link). Gaze position was recorded using an Eyelink 1000 (SR Research, Ontario, Canada) sampling at 500 Hz, after performing a 9-point calibration for each participant. Stimuli were rear-projected from two vertically stacked Casio XJS 52 projectors (Casio, Shibuyu, Tokyo) using their green channels and circular polarization to stimulate the two eyes dichoptically. Participants wore the appropriate corresponding circular polarizers in a spectacle frame. The full projection screen covered 54 cm in width × 41 cm in height at a resolution of 1024 × 768 pixels. The data collected in Vancouver for the diplopia control condition were generated using liquid crystal shutter glasses (CrystalEyes 4) synchronized to a Viewsonic G225f. monitor with a refresh rate of 120 Hz. In both sets of equipment, there was no perceptible cross-talk between the images presented to the two eyes at the levels of luminance and contrast used here.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Combination Therapy Enhances Cell Viability

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell growth over time was measured using the 3-(4.5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2.5 diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide (MTT, Sigma-Aldrich, MO, USA) assay similarly as in [16 (link)]. Cells were seeded in 96-well plates (3,000 cells/well) and continuously exposed to APIM-peptide (14 μg/mL APIM-peptide for Du145, PC3 and LNCaP, or 24 μg/mL for TRAMP-C1 and docetaxel (0.6 ng/mL for Du145 and LNCaP, 1.3 ng/mL for PC3, or 2.5 ng/mL for TRAMP-C1) until harvest at day one, three, and four. The ratio of viable cells in individual replicas of docetaxel and APIM-peptide + docetaxel treated cells versus untreated cells were log transformed with base 2. The resulting values reflecting the change of docetaxel + APIM-peptide relative to docetaxel only were subjected to one sided non-parametric Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test as implemented in MATLAB R2015a (MathWorks Inc.), in order to check if the combination treatment further reduced the viability compared to docetaxel alone.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Fluorescence Spectroscopy PARAFAC Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The pre-processed sample data were arranged into a three-way array with 114 samples, 61 excitation wavelengths in 5 nm increments ranging from 250 to 550 nm, and 71 emission wavelengths in 5 nm increments ranging from 250 to 600 nm. The fluorescence intensity was converted from arbitrary unites (A.U.) to Raman unites (R.U.) before PARAFAC analysis. The PARAFAC analysis was performed with MATLAB R2015a (Math Works, Inc., Cambridge, MA) software program, utilizing open source drEEM toolbox version 2.0 (Murphy et al., 2013 ). The appropriate number of components for the dataset was determined using outlier identification and method validation techniques (i.e., least square fit and split-half analysis) following methods outlined in Murphy et al., 2013 , with the best fit model having an explained variance of > 95%. The identities of the components determined in the model were verified through comparison to previously identified component models using OpenFluor (DOM fluorescence spectral database) (Murphy et al., 2014 ). Field triplicates of PARAFAC analysis resulted in percent standard deviation of < 1.2 %. The results of PARAFAC analyses, split-half analysis, and their specific percent standard deviation can be found in Supplementary Information S2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Trends in Pituitary Tumor Resection Procedures

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Using the CMS National Summary Data File and the CMS Carrier Summary Data File, we extracted all procedures with codes 61548 (microscopic hypophysectomy, transnasal or transseptal) and 62165 (neuroendoscopy for excision of pituitary tumor, transnasal or transsphenoidal), spanning the years 2003 to 2013. When the CMS provides state-level data in the Carrier file, procedure counts between 1 and 10 are censored and replaced with “n/a” to protect patient anonymity. We therefore conservatively replaced these “n/a” values with values of 1 during our analyses, so as not to overestimate endoscopic procedures. When constructing national maps, the average number of cases per year was ploted for two time periods, at the beginning (2005-7) of the available data, and the end of the available data (2009-11). Data were unavailable for Indiana and unavailable for 2005-7 for Pennsylvania. Figures and analysis were conducted with Matlab R2015a (MathWorks; Natick, MA, USA) and SPSS version 23 (IBM Corp.; Armonk, NY, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Methylation and Survival Analysis in Gynecological Oncology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Association between clinical data [Fédération Internationale de Gynécologie et d’Obstétrique (FIGO), TNM] and methylation status, corrected for disease status (primary or recurrence), was assessed using binomial logistic regression. The survival and hazard functions were estimated by Kaplan-Meier estimator and the log-rank test, respectively. Analyses were performed in Matlab R2015a (The Mathworks). An alpha level of 0.05 was employed for rejecting the null-hypothesis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Clinical Attack Frequency Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For the comparisons of frequency using 2 × 2 tables, a χ2 test or Fisher exact test was implemented based on the sample size of each cell. Comparisons of the frequency with k × 2 tables (k > 2) were performed using a Cochran-Armitage trend test. The elapsed time periods from onset and from the last clinical attack for each clinical attack during the medication-free period were compared using the Mann-Whitney U test because both were nonnormally distributed. The relapse-free period without medication between 0–24 months and 24–48 months from onset was compared using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Statistical analyses were conducted using either SPSS Statistics Base 22 software (IBM, Armonk, NY) or MATLAB R2015a (MathWorks, Natick, MA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantitative Cardiac Mapping: Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All resulting T1 and T2 maps were anonymized to the readers. T1 and T2 cMRF maps were calculated offline using MATLAB R2015a (MathWorks). After image reconstruction in MATLAB, DICOM files were created and the standard (MOLLI, T2 SSFP) and cMRF maps were analyzed using certified software (cvi42; Circle Cardiovascular Imaging, Inc., Calgary, Canada). Two experienced readers (LH and EH) manually drew region of interests over the entire myocardial wall to report global T1 and T2 values as well as segmental T1 and T2 values according to the American Heart Association 17 segment model. The mean and standard deviation (SD) in T1 and T2 values were calculated in these areas. One reader (EH) rated the image quality of each map out of 4 (1 = lowest, 4 = highest). As a result of import incompatibilities with multiple repeated images with the same Dicom tags, the dynamic cMRF maps were analysed in MATLAB by the same readers with the same methodology.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Optimal Breast Cancer Screening

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We applied a dynamic programming model developed by Kong and Mondschein12 to calculate the optimal ages to perform a fixed number of screening Mx in order to minimize the lifetime death rate from BC (software MATLAB R2015a published by MathWorks). The model decides whether or not to perform a screening mammogram every year during a woman's lifetime. The decision balances the immediate benefit of detecting a tumor at an earlier stage (thereby increasing the chances of survival) and the benefit of waiting until the woman is older, when the probability of developing a tumor might be higher. These decisions depend on incidence, false negative rates, and natural progression of the tumor, as a function of age, sensitivity of clinical breast examination, and survival rates at different stages of the tumor. Given an optimal allocation of screening mammograms, the model computes the corresponding expected costs (including the cost of the screening mammograms, direct cost of diagnosis, treatment, follow-up, and false positives), which enables us to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis. The model also offers the flexibility to evaluate the expected lifetime cost and lifetime death rate for any specific screening policy defined by the decision maker.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Evaluating Pedicle Screw Placement Accuracy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two-way intraclass correlation coefficient for absolute interrater agreement (IA) was calculated with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) to assess the absolute agreement among the four raters in grading the screw position accuracy. An IA below 0.40, between 0.40 and 0.59, between 0.60 and 0.74, and above 0.75 corresponded to poor, fair, good, and excellent agreement, respectively.15 Continuous variables were expressed as means and standard deviations, whereas ordinal and categorical variables as frequencies, ratios, or percentages.
The median value of the grades for each pedicle was considered as the consensus grade for further data analysis. One-tailed Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare accuracy for both groups, and Fisher's exact test was used for nominal variables comparison. Relative risks (RRs) along with 95% CI were calculated. We used one-tailed ordinal Spearman's correlation (ρ) to identify which of the morphological factors correlated with breaching. Statistical analysis was performed using Matlab R2015a (Mathworks, Natick, MA). A P value (P) less than 0.05 was considered as significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Fabrication of Micro Thin Film Nitinol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The sputter deposition technique along with a lift-off process previously described by Chun et al. was used to create M-TFN [15 (link)]. First, five different micro patterns were defined via a conventional photolithography process. Then, 50 µm deep trenches were created by the Deep Reactive Ion Etching (DRIE) technique. Once trenches were formed, both the copper sacrificial layer and silicon dioxide material inhibition layer were deposited for the thin film nitinol sputter deposition process. The deposited thin film nitinol was crystallized at 500 °C for 20 min in a vacuum of less than 1 × 10−7 Torr [16 (link)]. Finally, the M-TFN was obtained by etching sacrificial and inhibition layers consecutively. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Jeol-JSM 6610 LV, Tokyo, Japan) was used to characterize the geometry and size of the M-TFN. The obtained SEM images were used to calculate the porosity of the fenestrations in M-TFN with the custom-built MATLAB R2015a (MathWorks, Natick, MA, USA) image analysis code.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!