The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

78 protocols using x pert pro mrd

1

X-Ray Diffraction Analysis of Desiccated SC-2

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Desiccated purified SC-2 powder was macerated to fine, homogenous consistency and subjected to an X-Ray diffraction analyzer (X'Pert Pro MRD, PANalytical B. V., Almelo, The Netherlands). We have described the detailed methods in Text S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterization of In2O3-x h materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The microstructure of the obtained In2O3-x h samples materials were observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and the element content of the material was analyzed by an energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS), model JSM-7001, with a resolution of 1.2 nm, produced by Nippon electronics Co. Ltd in Guangzhou, China. The crystal structure of In2O3-x h was undertaken with x-ray diffraction (XRD) using the model X’pert pro MRD, manufactured by PANalytical B.V. The internal structure of the obtained sample was observed by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) with model JEM2100PLUS, which was manufactured by JEOL (BEIJING) Co., Ltd. in Beijing, China. The point resolution was 0.23 nm and the line resolution was 0.14 nm.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Surface and Compositional Analysis of BCP

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The surface morphology of the BCP powder was observed by field emission scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM; S4800, Hitachi/Horiba Co., Japan). In addition, X-ray diffractometer (X'Pert PRO MRD, PANalytical B.V., Netherlands) with Ni-filtered Cu-Kα ray, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR; Nicolet, Thermo Co., WI, USA), and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, K-Alpha ESKA system; Thermo, USA) were used to analyze the changes in chemical composition of the BCP before and after FGF-2 immobilization. For XRD measurement, we fixed the glancing angle of the specimen at 5° against the incident beam, enabling the detection of XRD patterns to be at a depth of less than 5 μm from the top surface of the substrate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Sludge Characterization and Heavy Metal Fractionation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The organic content of the EPS was tested by the gravimetric method as described in the relevant industry standard (CJ/T 221-2005). The crystal mineralogical composition of the prepared sludge powder was analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD, X’pert Pro MRD, PANalytical BV, the Netherlands). The chemical composition of the sludge powder was determined using ICP-MS after digestion using an HF-HNO3-HCl mixed solution. The surface micro-topography of the sludge powders before and after oxidation leaching were characterized by a field emission scanning electron microscope (SEM, GeminiSEM300, ZEISS, Germany) and an electron probe micro-analysis (JXA-8100, JEOL, Japan).
Fraction analysis of heavy metals present in the sludge was carried out by a modified Community Bureau of Reference (BCR) three-stage sequential extraction procedure; the details of the extraction steps are as described by Rauret et al. (1999 (link)). According to the method, metal forms in the sludge were categorized into four fractions: acid soluble fraction, reducible fraction, oxidizable fraction, and non-mobile residual fraction.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

XRD Analysis of Ceramic Biomaterials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The presence of the different crystalline planes in the CS/HA/β-TCP blocks was determined employing a PANalytical X’Pert PRO MRD diffractometer (Malvern Panalytical, Jarman Way, Royston, UK) using copper radiation at a wavelength of Kα1 (1.540598 Å) and Kα2 (1.544426 Å). The diffractometer was operated in the secondary electron mode at 45 kV in the 2θ range of 5 to 80° at a scan rate of 2 degrees/min with a scan speed of 2.63 s and a step size of 0.01°.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Characterizing Volcanic Soil Compositions

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To clarify the material properties of Akahoya, we measured the chemical compositions of several other kinds of volcanic soils as well: Shirasu [38 ,39 ,40 (link),41 (link)], Bora, and a clay possessing a chlorite group as the main minerals. These soils were mined from the area surrounding Mt. Kirishima in southern Kyushu, Japan. Figure 2 shows microscopy images of each soil. Akahoya (Nanken Kougyo Co., Miyakonojo, Japan) is a reddish soil. Shirasu (Nanken Kougyo Co., Miyakonojo, Japan) comprises glassy powder and fine, very hard stones. Bora (Nanken Kougyo Co., Miyakonojo, Japan) comprises granular pumice with some degree of hardness. The clay (Sougoo Co., Miyakonojo, Japan) is typically used as a raw material for bricks and tiles. We measured the chemical compositions of the samples by using an energy-dispersive X-ray analyzer (EDX-720, Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan). Then, we used X-ray diffraction (XRD) to examine the crystal structures of the soils by using an X-ray crystal structure analyzer (X’Pert-Pro MRD, Malvern Panalytical, Enigma, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

X-ray Diffraction Protocol for Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
XRD measurements were performed on a Materials Research Diffractometer (MRD; Malvern PANalytical Xpert Pro MRD, Malvern PANalytical). The diffractometer had a horizontal omega-2theta goniometer (320 mm radius) in a four-circle geometry and it worked with a ceramic X-ray tube with a Cu Kα anode (l = 1.540598 Å). The detector used was the Pixel, a fast X-ray detector based on Medipix2 technology. Incident optics used included: a parabolic mirror; a divergent slit, 1/ 4°; a mask, 2 mm; Soller slits, 0.04 rad; and a Ni filter (0.02 mm). Diffracted optics used included: the Pixel detector and an antiscatter slit, 7.5 mm. The measurements were performed using the scanning mode of the detector. Measurement conditions: 2theta range = 10-50°; step size = 0.03°; and counting time (time per step) = 500 s.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

XRD and FTIR Analysis of Thin Films

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The X-ray diffractometer X Pert PRO MRD from Malvern Panalytical Ltd. (Royston, UK) was used for XRD analysis during the different time-points. X-ray scans were done at room temperature (~22 • C) in the range of 10 • to 50 • (2θ degrees), using a Cu source, X-ray tube (γ = 1.54056 Å) at 45 kV and 40 mA with θ set to -0.0372 degrees for fine calibration offset.
2.3.9. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy FTIR spectra of the films were recorded with a Bruker FT-IR VERTEX 80/80v (Boston, MA, USA) in attenuated total reflectance mode (ATR) with a platinum crystal accessory in the wavenumber range:
Coatings 2020, 10, 467 5 of 14 4000-400 cm -1 , using 16 scans at a resolution of 4 cm -1 . Before analysis, an open bean background spectrum was recorded as a blank. All measurements were performed in triplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Synthesis and Characterization of BisBAL Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
BisBAL nanoparticles were synthesized and characterized as early was described in previous publications 15) . Briefly, bismuth (Bis) was mixed with 2,3-dimercapto-1-propanol (BAL) in a molar ratio 2:1 and the resultant composite BisBAL was reduced by sodium borohydride to generate BisBAL NPs. The stock suspensions of 25 mM of BisBAL NPs in 10 mL batches were prepared and stored at 4ºC until use. Information on the shape and size of nanoparticles was obtained using scanning electron microscopy (SEM; FEI Tecnai G2 Twin, FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA; 160 kV accelerating voltage). The rhombohedral crystallinity and crystallite size were determined using the X-ray diffractometer (XRD; X'Pert PRO MRD PANalytical, Lelyweg, The Netherlands) equipped with Cu Kα as X-ray source (λ=1.541874 Å). Diffractograms were interpreted using the Debye-Sherrer formula (X'Pert Data Viewer software PANalytical, Lelyweg, The Netherlands) to estimate the rhombohedral structure and crystallite size.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Structural Characterization of MoS2 Thin Films

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Grazing incidence X-ray diffraction (GI-XRD) was employed to determine the crystalline phases of the MoS 2 thin films. The XRD analysis was performed on a Panalytical X'Pert PRO MRD employing Cu Kα (1.54 Å) radiation with an incidence angle of 0.5°with respect to the substrate plane. Furthermore, Raman spectroscopy (RS) and photoluminescence (PL) spectroscopy measurements were performed with a Renishaw Raman microscope equipped with a 514 nm laser, integrated switchable gratings with 600 or 1800 lines per mm, and a CCD detector. For each scan, 5 accumulations with acquisition time of 10 s were taken. The surface morphology was studied by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) using a ZeissSigma Nanolab operating at an acceleration voltage of 2 kV. Additionally, atomic force microscopy (AFM) was also employed to study the surface topology of the as-deposited films. The images were acquired at room temperature on Veeco dimension 3100 operated in tapping mode using Al coated Si tip (PointProbe Plus-NCHR) having a radius <7 nm. Images were processed in Gwyddion software with OpenGL interface and RMS roughness was obtained statistically from a scan area of 500 × 500 nm 2 .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!