The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

36 protocols using cinahl complete

1

Comprehensive Literature Search Protocol for Evidence Synthesis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We will search MEDLINE (PubMed), CINAHL Complete (EBSCO), Scopus (Elsevier), and APA PsychInfo (Ovid) for published studies. An initial search in MEDLINE (PubMed) identified keywords and structured vocabulary from relevant studies that guided the development of the core search strategy. We iteratively developed the components of our core search strategy in alignment with our eligibility criteria. The finalized core search strategy is presented in Table 2. Once finalized, the core search strategy was translated for CINAHL Complete (EBSCO), Scopus Advanced (Elsevier) and APA PsychInfo (Ovid) databases using the Polygot Translator, [57 (link)] and manual edits were made to search strings, as needed. We updated structural vocabulary, when available, to align with each database, while remaining consistent to our objective and core search strategy. Translated search strategies are included in Table A in S1 File.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Comprehensive Literature Search Strategy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The following databases were searched for literature in July 2021: Medline Complete (EBSCO), CINAHL Complete (EBSCO), Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, Embase (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ovid), and Emcare (Ovid). A full electronic search strategy for Medline Complete was developed to include all possible terms (See S2 Appendix) [19 (link)]. A targeted search of grey literature was conducted within relevant organisations’ websites such as Care Search and Palliative Care Australia. In addition, reference lists of the selected articles were scanned for additional articles.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Systematic Review of PCOS and Exercise

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The electronic databases as follows will be searched from inception to present: CINAHL Complete (EBSCO), Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (Wiley), MEDLINE (EBSCO), Scopus (Elsevier), SPORTDiscus (EBSCO), PEDro (The University of Sydney) and PubMed (US National Library of Medicine). Clinical trials will be sought via searches of ClinicalTrials.gov and UK Clinical Trials Gateway. Only English language publications will be sought, and no publication date limitations will be applied.
The search terms will be PCOS or polycystic ovary syndrome and terms relating to exercise or physical activity interventions. These will be adapted for use in other databases.
The PubMed search strategy can be found in the Appendix.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Systematic Review of Therapeutic Plasma Exchange

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An electronic search of the literature was conducted in Medline (PubMed), CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost), Embase (Elsevier), and Web of Science (Core Collection) from inception to December 12, 2017. An updated search was conducted June 11, 2018. A sensitive search strategy was used, combining controlled vocabulary and keywords related to: therapeutic plasma exchange, plasmapheresis, anticoagulants and therapy. A Duke modified Cochrane All Studies filter was applied to the results. The literature search included publications, posters, abstracts and conference proceedings. The detailed search strategy can be found in the appendix.
The reference lists of all selected publications were further reviewed to retrieve relevant publications that were not identified in the computerized search. To identify relevant articles, two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts of all citations identified through the search. Where there was a conflict, a third reviewer made the final selection decision.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Virtual Care for Traditionally Gendered Health

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
MEDLINE (through Ovid), Embase (through Elsevier), and CINAHL Complete (through EBSCO) were searched from January 1, 2010 to October 10, 2022 using a combination of database-specific controlled vocabulary terms and keywords related to virtual care and women or aspects of traditionally gendered care. An experienced medical librarian (S.C.) devised and conducted the searches, with input from the other authors. The search used a modified qualitative research filter, adapted from the ASTED(3S)/CHLA.34 The search strategies were peer-reviewed by another librarian before the execution using a modified Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies checklist.35 (link) The full, reproducible search strategies are in Appendix A section of Supplementary Data. Additional references were identified by handsearching the VA women's health and telehealth listservs for relevant recent articles. All citations were imported into Covidence systematic review software (Veritas Health Innovation, Melbourne, Australia).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Evidence-based Behavior Change Interventions for Disadvantaged Populations

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Researchers collaborated with a health librarian (blinded for the review) to develop the search strategy, in which initial search term combinations were tested for the retrieval of target articles. The main concepts explored were family doctors, behaviour change tools, and populations experiencing disadvantage (for example, First Nations peoples and groups that are culturally and linguistically diverse).
The following electronic databases were searched in September 2021: MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, Scopus, APA (American Psychological Association) PsycArticles (Ovid), and CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost). Medical subject headings were identified for each term and then incorporated into the literature search for the applicable database. Other known synonyms were added to the search, with the Boolean connectors ‘AND’ and ‘OR’ used to combine the search terms.
Proximity searching was implemented to support the search. The articles identified by the search were exported into EndNote, then uploaded to Covidence (with duplicates automatically removed) for screening and data extraction.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Systematic review of AI in IBD

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A systematic search to identify potentially relevant citations will be performed using the following electronic databases: Medline (Ovid), Embase (Elsevier), Cochrane CENTRAL (Wiley), CINAHL Complete (EBSCO), Web of Science (Clarivate) and IEEE Xplore (Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers). A medical librarian (LK) initially created Medline and Embase search strategies using a combination of controlled vocabularies and keywords for the concepts of inflammatory bowel disease and AI and either imaging, endoscopy or histology. Team members reviewed the strategies and results to edit and improve the search strategy. With the team’s approval, the librarian will create customised search strategies using controlled vocabularies (when available) and keywords in the remaining preidentified databases. See online supplemental appendix I, in supplemental materials, for the Medline search details.
All resulting citations will be exported into an EndNote V.20 (Clarivate Analytics, Philadelphia, USA) library and deduplicated (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pc/articles/PMC4915647/).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Assessing Financial Burden in Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A reference librarian designed the literature search to identify published studies. We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL Complete (Ebsco) and PsycINFO (Ebsco), through March 20, 2019, using a combination of relevant subject headings, concepts, and text words involving financial burden, cancer, and self-reported questionnaires. Detailed strategies are available in Supplemental Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Systematic Review of miRNA in Neuropathic Pain

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A systematic search was performed in April 2021 on four electronic databases, namely, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and CINAHL Complete (EBSCO). The terms used for search words included the following: (“neuropathic pain”, “Neuralgia”, “Nerve pain”, “sciatica”, “chronic constriction injury”, “spinal nerve ligation”, “spared nerve injury”, “chronic compression dorsal root ganglion”, “CCI”, “SNI”, “SNL” or “CCD”) and (“microRNA”, “micro-RNA”, “mir*”, or “miRNA”). No language restrictions were employed. The reference lists of all identified articles were examined. Full details of the search strategy for all databases can be found in Supplementary Appendix S1. Subsequently, all search results were imported in EndNote X7 (Thomson Research Soft, Stamford, United States). Duplicate items, reviews, abstracts and full texts were removed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Comprehensive Systematic Literature Search

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Information retrieval was conducted by a medical librarian (NS) on August 1, 2019 and updated on December 1, 2020. Our primary database was MEDLINE (Ovid) 1946–2019. The Medline search strategy (see Appendix I) was developed and peer reviewed by library colleagues using PRESS guidelines [20 (link)], then reviewed by the research team prior to being translated and applied to Embase (embase.com) 1974 – 2019, CINAHL Complete (Ebscohost) ) 1937–2019, PsycINFO (Ebscohost) 1872–2019, Sociological Abstracts (ProQuest) 1952– 2019, and Cochrane Library (wiley.com) including CENTRAL (wiley.com), and Scopus (scopus.org) 1970–2019.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!