The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Sx50 electron microprobe

Manufactured by Cameca
Sourced in France

The SX50 electron microprobe is an analytical instrument designed for the elemental analysis of solid materials. It utilizes a focused electron beam to excite characteristic X-rays from the sample, which are then detected and analyzed to determine the chemical composition of the material. The SX50 provides high-resolution imaging and quantitative analysis of a wide range of materials, including metals, ceramics, and geological samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

12 protocols using sx50 electron microprobe

1

Multi-analytical Ore Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Grade analysis, reflected light optical microscopy, electron microscopy investigation (SEM) and microprobe analyses (EPMA) were performed on the available ore samples. The SEM observations were carried out on a JSM-6360 electron microscope with a 20 kV voltage, while quantitative chemical analyses were performed using a CAMECA SX50 electron microprobe with an acceleration voltage of 25 kV, a beam current of 20 nA, a surface of the analysed area of 3 × 3 micrometers, and a counting time of 10 s for peaks and 5 s for background.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

EPMA Analysis of C-S-H Phases

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Electron probe micro-analysis (EPMA) of natural and synthetic C–S–H was performed on polished thin sections, made from pressed sample pellets, using a Cameca SX50 electron microprobe (acceleration voltage of 15 kV, current beam of 12 nA) and a 1–2 µm beam width. Prior to analysis, a 10–20 nm-thick carbon layer was sputter-coated onto the samples (Edwards Auto 306). Ca and Si were analysed simultaneously. Ca Kα and Si Kα were analysed using a pentaerythritol crystal and a thallium acid phthalate crystal, respectively. The standards used were albite (NaAlSi3O8) for Si and wollastonite (CaSiO3) for Ca. A ZAF data correction was applied to the raw data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Geochemical Analysis of Clay Pellets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Thirty clay pellets from both the central MGB and the concretionary burrow fill at the top of the MGB, and 14 non-pellet, cement areas were analyzed with a Cameca SX-50 electron microprobe equipped with four wavelength-dispersive spectrometers. Clay pellets were selected for analysis based on color in thin section and false color in QEMSCAN images. In an attempt to locate a potassium X-ray signal, some spot analyses focused on QEMSCAN-identified glauconitic grains, although very sparse. The more numerous clay pellets showed a low potassium signal. One to four spots were analyzed on each pellet for a total of 44 clay analyses. Analytical conditions were 15 keV accelerating voltage, 20 nA beam current, and a defocussed beam of 10–20 µm in diameter. A suite of natural minerals was employed as standards, and X-ray intensities were reduced using a phi-rho-z algorithm [36] .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Electron Probe Microanalysis of Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Electron probe micro-analyser (EPMA) analyses were performed using a Cameca SX50 electron microprobe (acceleration voltage of 15 kV, beam current of 12 nA) and a 1–2 µm beam width. Prior to analysis, a 10–20 nm-thick carbon layer was sputter-coated on the samples (Edwards Auto 306). Ca and Si were analysed simultaneously. Ca Kα and Si Kα were analysed using a pentaerythritol crystal and a thallium acid phthalate crystal, respectively. The standards used were albite (NaAlSi3O8) for Si and wollastonite (CaSiO3) for Ca. A ZAF data correction (Merlet, 1994 ▸ ) was applied to the raw data.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Bone Mineral Composition Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To study the mineral content of the metatarsal bones excised from DMP1-PPRKO animals and littermate controls, we applied the same electron microprobe analysis developed to study the mineral fine structure of American lobster cuticle, as previously described (61 ). Briefly, the liquid nitrogen frozen bone samples were embedded, after having been plunged in liquid-nitrogen-chilled acetone, in Epo-Thin Resin (Buehler), and finely polished to obtain a flat smooth surface.
The specimens were examined via a Cameca SX-50 Electron Microprobe (Madison, WI 53711, USA) to provide electron probe microanalysis (EPMA) for a chosen list of ions PO4−, Mg2+, Ca2+, Ba2+, Mn2+, K+, and Na+. The SX-50 allows for a set of ions, measured simultaneously at each location. Data from the EPMA instruments were subsequently exported and analyzed as reported.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Olivine Host Crystal Composition Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The composition of the olivine host crystal (Supplementary Table 1) used in the experiments was determined using a Cameca SX-50 electron microprobe (EMPA). Accelerating potential was 15 kV, 20 nA current and 1 μm beam size, using natural and synthetic mineral standards for calibration.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Electron Microprobe Analysis of Geological Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chemical analyses were carried out on sample Ac139 using a CAMECA SX50 electron microprobe (WDS mode, 20 kV, 20 nA, 2 μm beam diameter) at CNR-IGG of Padova. Standards used were Kakanui pyrope (New Zealand) from the Smithsonian Museum (TAP analyser crystal, MgKα element emission line); Amelia albite (Virginia) (TAP, NaKα); diopside (TAP, SiKα); Al2O3 (TAP, AlKα); MnTiO3 (PET, TiKα; LIF, MnKα); Cr2O3 (LIF, CrKα); Fe2O3 (LIF, FeKα); sphalerite (LIF, ZnKα); NiO (LIF, NiKα). Raw data were reduced with the PAP-type correction software provided by CAMECA. The resulting oxides wt% are reported in Supplementary Table 1. Chemical analyses on sample MgCr2 were carried out by standardless EDS analysis on a FEG scanning-electron microscope, using an Oxford Instruments SDD detector and the AZtec TruQ software installed at the Oxford Instruments in Wiessbaden (Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Compositional Analysis of Compensated Glasses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Compensated glasses with Al/Si = {0.20, 0.33, 0.72, 1.00} and 0.0 ≤ XK = K2O/(K2O + Na2O) ≤ 1.0 were prepared following the protocol described in Le Losq and Neuville14 (link). Densities of all samples have been measured with the Archimedes method using toluene as the immersion liquid (Table S1). Chemical compositions have been measured using a Cameca SX50 electron microprobe at the CAMPARIS facility of the University Paris VI (France), with a 30 nA current, U = 30 kV, and 5 s of counting. Chemical compositions are the mean of 10–20 individual measurements. All glasses are uncolored and transparent, and no crystallization has been detected by optical microscope, Raman spectroscopy or in the electron diffraction pattern during HRTEM observations.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Microscopic Analyses of Recovered Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Textural aspects of the recovered samples were firstly analyzed in thin section at the optical microscope and successively at the Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), using a FEI Quanta-400 at the Earth Sciences Department (Sapienza University, Rome, Italy). Phase compositions were analyzed at the Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche-Istituto di Geologia Ambientale e Geoingegneria (CNR-IGAG, Rome), by a Cameca SX50 electron microprobe equipped with five wavelength dispersive spectrometers (WDS).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Geochemical Analysis of Volcanic Tephra

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Major and minor element compositions were determined on micro-pumice fragments and/or glass shards (grain size >250 μm) from the tephra layer FIC-12.9 (Fig 3). The analyses were carried out at the Istituto di Geologia Ambientale e Geoingegneria of the Italian National Research Council (IGAG-CNR) (Rome, Italy) using a Cameca SX50 electron microprobe equipped with a five-wavelength dispersive spectrometer. Operating conditions were as follows: accelerating voltage, 15 kV; beam current, 15 nA; beam diameter, 10–15 μm; counting time, 20 s per element. The following standards were used: wollastonite (Si and Ca), corundum (Al), diopside (Mg), andradite (Fe), rutile (Ti), orthoclase (K), jadeite (Na), phlogopite (F), potassium chloride (Cl), baritina (S), and metals (Mn). The Ti content was corrected for the overlap of the Ti-Kα peaks. To evaluate the accuracy of the EMP analyses, three international secondary standards (Kakanui augite, Iceladic Bir-1, and rhyolite RLS132 glasses) were analysed prior to the measurements. The mean analytical precision was <1% for SiO2 and Al2O3, 5% for K2O, CaO and FeO, and 6–9% for the other elements.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!