The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

12 protocols using improm 2 reverse transcriptase system kit

1

Evaluating Gene Expression via qRT-PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
We conducted total RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis, as previously described (Kim and Somers, 2010 (link)). Protoplasts were incubated for 16 h after transfection under dim white light and flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen for subsequent RNA extraction and qRT-PCR. Then, we extracted total RNA using WelPrep™ Total RNA Isolation Reagent (Welgene, Korea) and used it for cDNA synthesis using the ImProm II™ Reverse Transcriptase System kit (Promega, United States). Further, qPCR was performed on a CFX96 real-time qPCR detection system (Bio-Rad, United States) using appropriate primer sets. We designed primers for candidate genes using Primer 3 software (Untergasser et al., 2012 (link)) and are listed (Supplementary Table 1). The relative expression of target genes was calculated using the 2−ΔΔCT method (Kim et al., 2008 (link)). ACT2 gene was used as the internal reference.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Gene Expression by RT-PCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA from cell lines or tissues was extracted by Trizol solution (Invitrogen). Complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized from total RNA with ImProm-II™ reverse transcriptase system kit (Promega Corporation). To detect gene expressions, we used the synthesized cDNA for PCR with the following primers:

Pin1

Forward: 5′-ATGGCGGACGAGGAGAAGCTGC-3′

Reverse: 5′-TCACTCAGTGCGGAGGATGATG-3′

GAPDH

Forward: 5′-TGGTATCGTGGAAGGACTCA-3′

Reverse: 5′-AGTGGGTGTCGCTGTTGAAG-3′

+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative Analysis of Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated from the third and fourth rosette leaves using WelPrep total RNA isolation reagent (WELGENE, Republic of Korea), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. First-strand cDNA was synthesized from 1.0 μg of RNA using the ImProm II Reverse Transcriptase system kit (Promega, USA), followed by quantitative PCR (qPCR) analysis to determine gene expression levels (Bio-Rad, CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System, USA). Primers used for qRT–PCR are listed in Supplementary Table S1 at JXB online. Transcript levels were calculated using the comparative threshold (CT) method, with ACT2 (At3g18780) as the internal control.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Total RNA Isolation and Quantitative RT-PCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated from frozen samples with WelPrep total RNA isolation reagent (WELGENE, Gyeongsan, Republic of Korea), in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions and treated with RNase‐free DNase I (Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan) to prevent genomic DNA contamination. For first‐strand cDNA synthesis, we used 2 µg of total RNA in a 25‐µL reaction mixture with using the ImProm II Reverse Transcriptase system kit (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). qPCR analysis was performed to determine gene expression levels (CFX96 Touch Real‐Time PCR Detection System; Bio‐Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) using a SYBR premix ExTaq kit (Takara Bio). The levels of OsUbi mRNA served to normalize the expression ratio for each gene. Changes in expression were calculated via the ΔΔCt method. Gene‐specific primers used for qRT‐PCR are listed in Table S1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative Real-Time PCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TRIzol® reagent (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) was used to extract total RNA from the collected cells based on the manufacturer's instructions. Total RNA (1 µg) was reverse transcribed in a final volume of 30 µl using the ImProm-II reverse transcriptase system kit (Promega Corporation) according to the manufacturer's instructions. cDNAs were used for PCR. The primer sequences are summarized in Table I. The AniQ5 Continuous Fluorescence Detector System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.) and a 2X SYBR® Green PCR Master Mix (cat. no. RR420A, Takara Bio, Inc.) were used to perform the qPCR at 95˚C for 30 sec, followed by 40 cycles of 95˚C for 3 sec and 60˚C for 30 sec and a single cycle of 95˚C for 15 sec, 60˚C for 60 sec, and 95˚C for 15 sec to generate dissociation curves. All PCR reactions were performed in triplicate, and the specificity of the reaction was determined by melting curve analysis. Comparative quantification of each target gene was performed based on cycle threshold (Ct) normalized to β-actin using the 2-ΔΔCq method (18 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Gene Expression Analysis of Penaeus monodon

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Specific pathogen-free (SPF) Penaeus monodon (~4 g, fresh weight) were purchased from the Shrimp Genetic Improvement Center, BIOTEC, Thailand. Shrimp were reared in an aerated tank with seawater at 20 ppt salinity for 7 days before the experiments began. The hemolymph was collected and total RNA was extracted using the TRI Reagent (Molecular Research Center) following the manufacturer’s protocol. First-strand cDNA was synthesized using the ImProm-II Reverse Transcriptase System kit (Promega) with 1.5 μg of total RNA and 0.5 μg of oligo(dT)15 primer. For the gene expression analysis at different developmental stages, RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis as described above was done on three individual shrimp from four stages including nauplius 3 (N3), protozoea 2 (Z2), mysis 2 (M2) and post-larvae 15 (PL15).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Validation of RNAseq Results by qPCR

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To validate the RNAseq results, quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) were carried out to determine gene expression levels of the 10 selected genes. Gene-specific qPCR primers were designed by using Primer3 (Untergasser et al., 2012 (link)) (Table S2). Total RNA (1.5 µg) was reverse transcribed into cDNA using an ImPromII™ Reverse Transcriptase System kit (Promega, USA) according to the manufacturer’s recommendation. Each 20 µL qPCR reaction included 0.5 µL cDNA, 200 nM of each primer, and SsoAdvanced™ Universal SYBR® Green supermix (Bio-Rad, USA) according to the company’s instruction. The thermal cycling parameters were 95 °C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s, 57 °C for 30 s and 72 °C for 30 s. The melting curve analysis was performed from 65 °C to 95 °C with a continuous fluorescent reading with a 0.5 °C increment. The threshold cycle (Ct) was analyzed using BioRad CFX Manager 2.1 software (Bio-Rad, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Rice Total RNA Extraction and qRT-PCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The total RNA was extracted from various rice tissues with WelPrep total RNA isolation reagent (WELGENE, Republic of Korea), according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and treated with RNase-free DNase I (Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan) to prevent genomic DNA contamination. First-strand cDNA was synthesized from 2 µg of total RNA in a 25-µL reaction mixture with using the ImProm II Reverse Transcriptase system kit (Promega, Madison, WI), followed by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis to determine gene expression levels (Bio-Rad, CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System, USA) using a SYBR premix ExTaq kit (Takara Bio, Shiga, Japan). The gene expressions were normalized using the rice ubiquitin gene (LOC_Os06g46770) as an internal control. Changes in expression were calculated via the ΔΔCt method. Primers for PCR are listed in Supplementary Table 5.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Gene Expression Analysis in Senescence Mutants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was isolated from leaves of Col, ein2/ore3, and ahk3/ore12 plants using WelPrep™ Total RNA Isolation Reagent (Welgene, Korea) and used for cDNA synthesis employing the ImProm II™ Reverse Transcriptase System kit (Promega, USA). Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) was performed using SYBR Premix Ex-Taq (Enzynomics, Korea) and the CFX96 Touch Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad, USA). Fold changes in gene expression were calculated using the CT method relative to their initial expression in leaves of each genotype at day 0 (before dark incubation) in dark-induced leaf senescence or 12 days after leaf emergence (DAE) in developmental leaf senescence and normalized against Actin-2 (ACT2). Primers used for qPCRs are listed in Supplementary Table S1 at JXB online.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantitative PCR Analysis of Cell Signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total cellular RNA was extracted from cells by use of the RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen, Alameda, CA), then reverse-transcribed to cDNA by use of the Improm-II Reverse Transcriptase system kit (Promega, Madison, WI). The PCR primers were as follows:
HPV-16E7, forward, 5′-ATGAGAGGAAACAAC CCAAC-3′
HPV-16E7, reverse, 5′-AGCTAGGGCACACA ATGGTA-3′
β-actin, forward 5′-TGGCATTGCCGACAGGATG CAGAA-3′
β-actin, reverse 5′-CTCGTCATACTCCTGCTTG CTGAT-3′
Quantitative real-time PCR of CIP2A, c-Myc and E2F1, E2F2, E2F3 levels were performed as described [40 (link)] using the following oligos:
CIP2A, forward, 5′-GCCACACTGATTCGGTG TTTT-3′
CIP2A, reverse, 5′-TGCCGACAAAGATTTGCC AATA-3′
c-Myc, forward, 5′-GTCAAGAGGCGAACACA CAAC-3′
c-Myc, reverse, 5′-TTGGACGGACAGGATGT ATGC-3′
E2F1, forward, 5′-CATCCCAGGAGGTCACT TCTG-3′
E2F1, reverse, 5′-GACAACAGCGGTTCTT GCTC-3′
E2F2, forward, 5′-ACGGCGCAACCTACAA AGAG-3′
E2F2, reverse, 5′-GTCTGCGTGTAAAGCG AAGT-3′
E2F3, forward, 5′-GGTCCTGGATCTGAACA AGGC-3′
E2F3, reverse, 5′-CCTTCCAGCACGTTG GTGAT-3′
GAPDH, forward, 5′-GCACCGTCAAGGCTGA GAAC-3′
GAPDH, reverse, 5′-TGGTGAAGACGCCAG TGGA-3′
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!