The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

11 protocols using ab124954

1

Antioxidant Protein Expression in PC12 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PC12 cells were incubated in six‐well plates at a density of 2 × 105 and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. After suitable treatments, the cells were collected and lysed with ice‐cold RIPA lysis buffer. Equal amounts of protein samples (80 μg) were separated on a 10% SDS/PAGE gel and transferred electrophoretically onto nitrocellulose membrane. Subsequently, the membranes were blocked with 5% skim milk and incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibody: anti‐HO‐1 (ab68477; Abcam Biotechnology, Cambridge, MA, USA), anti‐GCLC (ab190685; Abcam Biotechnology), anti‐GCLM(ab126704; Abcam Biotechnology), anti‐NQO‐1 (ab124954; Abcam Biotechnology), anti‐TrxR‐1 (ab124954; Abcam Biotechnology) and anti‐β‐actin (AP0060; Bioworld Technology, Bloomington, MN, USA). After being washed three times with 1× Tis‐buffered saline‐Tween 20, the membrane was incubated with anti‐rabbit IgG for 1 h at room temperature. Proteins were visualized by exposure in a ChemiDoc XRS + system (Bio‐Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Band density was quantified by imagej (National Institute of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Flow Cytometry Analysis of RRM1, ASK1, and TrxR1 Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Expression subunit RRM1 of RNR, ASK1, and TrxR1 proteins was analyzed by flow cytometry. Sensitive and MDR cells were treated with 2 μM 5 or 8 μM 6. After 24 h treatment, the cells were trypsinized, washed with PBS, and fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min at 4°C. Samples were then permeabilized by ice-cold absolute methanol overnight at −20°C. After washing in PBS, cells were blocked for 1 h in 0.5% BSA in PBS. Cell pellet was than resuspended in primary antibodies, diluted in 0.5% BSA [1:50 RRM1 (ab137114, Abcam, United Kingdom), 1:200 ASK1 (ab45178, Abcam, United Kingdom), and 1:500 TrxR1 (ab124954, Abcam, United Kingdom), and incubated overnight at 4°C. Following incubation, samples were washed twice in 0.5% BSA, resuspended in fluorescently labeled anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody (Alexa Fluor® 488 Conjugated, #4412, Cell Signaling Technology, United States), diluted 1:1,000 in 0.5% BSA, and incubated for 1 h at room temperature in the dark. The fluorescence was measured in the FL1 channel on CyFlow Space flow cytometer (Partec, Münster, Germany) and analyzed by Summit analysis software. A minimum of 10,000 events was assayed per sample.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Western Blot Analysis of Antioxidant Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lung tissues were lysed in 1× RIPA buffer using a BeadBlaster24R (Benchmark Scientific, Sayreville, NJ, USA). Proteins were separated into 4–20% SDS-polyacrylamide gels and semi-dry-transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Membranes were blocked for 1 h in 5% milk and probed overnight on a 4 °C rocker with the following primary antibodies: anti-Gclc (ab190685, Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-Gpx2 (ab137431, 1:2000, Abcam), anti-Gpx4 (sc-166570, 1:1000, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), NQO1 (ab34173, 1:2000, Abcam), Sepp1 (PA5-112707, 1:1000, Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA) or Txnrd11 (ab124954, 1:1000, Abcam). Membranes were then incubated at room temperature for 1 h in secondary antibody of goat anti-mouse HRP (horseradish peroxidase) (1031-05, 1:2000, Southern Biotech, Birmingham, AL, USA) or goat anti-rabbit HRP (4030-05, 1:2000, Southern Biotech). Membranes were developed using enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) with ChemiDoc imaging and quantified by densitometry using Image Studio (Li-Cor, v 5.2.1, Lincoln, Nebraska). All quantifications for western blots were normalized to β-actin (8H10D10, 1:2000 Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Protein Extraction, Quantification, and Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein extraction reagent (Beyotime) and BCA protein quantification reagent (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) were used for protein extraction and quantification respectively. WB was executed according to a previous report [29 (link)]. The extracted protein samples were separated using SDS-PAGE (Beyotime), followed by transferring to nitrocellulose membranes (Invitrogen). After blockage with nonfat milk (5%; Beyotime), the antibodies listed below were applied to incubate these membranes for 12–14 h at 4°C: Bcl-2 (ab194583, 1:1500, Abcam), Bax (ab32503, 1:1500, Abcam), glucose transport protein type 1 (GLUT1; ab150299, 1:3000, Abcam), LDHA (ab125683, 1:2000, Abcam), TXNRD1 (ab124954, 1:1500, Abcam) or β-actin (ab227387, 1:3000, Abcam). After incubation of the corresponding secondary antibody (ab205718, 1:6000, Abcam), protein blot visualization was achieved by an ECL reagent (Abcam). Analysis of relative levels of proteins was performed by densitometric analysis using Image J software (Bio-Rad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Western Blot Analysis of Protein Signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell lysates were prepared with M-PER (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA) plus protease inhibitor cocktail (HaltTM; Pierce) and protein concentrations were determined using the bicinchoninic acid assay (BCA) (Pierce). Aliquots of protein lysates were subjected to 10% SDS-PAGE, followed by electroblotting and immunoblotting for anti-p-AKT (Ser473) (1:1000, 3787S), anti-t-AKT (1:1000, 2920S), anti-a-caspase-3 (1:1000, 9661), anti-PARP (1:1000, 9542), anti-GAPDH (1:5000, 2118) (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), anti-t-caspase-3 (1:1000, ADI-AAP-113-D, Enzo), anti-actin (1:10000, 20536-1, Proteintech, Rocky Hill, NJ, USA), anti-GR (1:1000, E-AB-10354, Elabscience, Texas, USA), anti-GPX4 (1:1000, ab40993) and anti-TrxR (1:1000, ab124954, Abcam). Membranes were then probed with the indicated primary antibodies, followed by reacting with corresponding secondary antibodies, and detected using a chemiluminescence assay (PerkinElmer Life and Analytical Sciences, Boston, MA, USA). Membranes were exposed to X-ray film to visualize the bands (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Piscataway, NJ, USA). Band intensities were quantified with a LAS-1000 plus system (Fuji Film, Japan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Protein Expression Analysis in Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total protein content was extracted from 3 × 105 cells in each group using radioimmunoprecipitation assay lysis buffer (Bioswamp) and quantified using a bicinchoninic acid kit (Bioswamp) following the manufacturer's protocol. 20 μg of proteins were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and transferred onto polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Millipore, MA, USA). After blocking with 5% skim milk for 2 h at room temperature, the membranes were incubated with primary antibodies against CDC2 (Bioswamp, PAB30052, 1 : 1,000), B-cell lymphoma-2 (Bcl-2, Bioswamp, PAB30042, 1 : 1,000), Bcl-2-associated X (Bax, Bioswamp, PAB30040, 1 : 1,000), nuclear factor erythroid-2-related factor 2 (Nrf2, Bioswamp, PAB30175, 1 : 1,000), TrxR1 (abcam, ab124954, 1 : 5,000), apoptosis signal regulating kinase 1 (ASK1, Bioswamp, PAB36297-P, 1 : 1,000), phosphorylated (p)-ASK1 (abcam, ab47304, 1 : 1,000), and GAPDH (Bioswamp, PAB36269, 1 : 1,000) overnight at 4°C. After washing, the membranes were incubated with horseradish peroxidase-labeled goat antirabbit IgG secondary antibody (Bioswamp, PAB160011, 1 : 20,000) for 1 h at room temperature and visualized using a Tanon-5200 apparatus (Tanon, Shanghai, China). The band gray values were read using the TANON GIS software (Tanon). GAPDH acted as the internal reference.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantifying Cellular Redox and Hypoxic Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The protein levels of TXNRD1 or hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) and housekeeping Glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) were determined using Western blot analysis. In brief, whole cellular protein was extracted from cultured cells by a brief sonication in RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 150 mM NaCl, 1% Nonidet P-40, 0.5% sodium deoxycholate, and 0.1% SDS) containing protease inhibitor cocktail (Roche, Mannheim, Germany), and fractioned by 10% SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) for detection of TXNRD1 or 7% SDS-PAGE for HIF-1α. After being transferred to nitrocellulose membranes (Bio-Rad Lab, Hercules, CA, USA), the TXNRD1 proteins (55 kDa) on the blot were identified using rabbit monoclonal anti-TXNRD1 antibody (Ab 124954, Abcam, Toronto, ON, Canada) or HIF-1α (~120 kDa) using mouse monoclonal anti-HIF-1α antibody (sc-53546, Santa Cruz Biotech, Dallas, TX, USA) along with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated secondary antibodies. The blots were reprobed using housekeeping GAPDH (36 kDa) with anti-GAPDH antibody (Epitope Biotech Inc., Vancouver, BC, Canada) to confirm equal protein loading in each sample. The expression levels of the TXNRD1 or HIF-1α proteins were measured using a densitometry, and were calculated as the ratio of the TXNRD1 or HIF-1α protein to the GAPDH on the same blots.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Protein Extraction and Western Blot Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Skeletal muscle tissues were homogenized in RIPA buffer (50 mM Tris-HCl pH7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM EDTA, 1% NP-40, 0.1% SDS) with 1% protease inhibitor cocktail (Abcam, ab65621), from which total protein was extracted by centrifugation at 20,000× g. The protein concentration of the extract was measured using a protein assay kit (Pierce; Rockford, IL, USA) and was then adjusted to equal volume in all samples with 2 × 4% SDS sample buffer. The samples were boiled for 5 min and were then loaded on a 7.5% SDS-PAGE gel (30 µg protein/10 µL per well) followed by electrophoresis using a Bio-Rad mini gel apparatus set at 40 mA/gel for 45 min. The fractionated protein on the gel was electrically transferred onto a polyvinyl difluoride membrane (Millipore). The membrane was first probed with the primary antibodies to Sdhd (ab189945) and Txnrd1 (ab124954) purchased from Abcam followed by the secondary antibody (HRP Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG Antibody, HRP, Thermo-Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). After three washes with TBST, the membrane was treated with enhanced chemiluminescence substrate (Pierce; Rockford, IL, USA) for 5 min. The blots on the membrane were visualized and analyzed using a UVP BioImaging System (EpiChemi II Darkroom). The final reported data were normalized by Ponceau S staining.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Immunohistochemical Analysis of TXNRD1

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tumor tissues were fixed in formaldehyde (10%), embedded in paraffin, followed by cutting at a thickness of 4 μm slides. Next, these sections were incubated with the TXNRD1 (ab124954, 1:200, Abcam) antibody overnight at 4°C to measure TXNRD1 expression. After incubation with secondary antibody (ab150077, 1:1000, Abcam). After staining with diaminoaniline (DAB; Beyotime) and counterstaining with hematoxylin (Beyotime), the images were obtained under a microscope (Leica). The TXNRD1 score was defined as the percentage of TXNRD1-positive staining cells in the total number of cancer cells.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantitative Immunoblotting Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunoblotting was performed as described before. 22 Following antibodies and dilutions were used: Trx: 1:5000 from abcam/ab133524, TXNIP: 1:1000 from Novus Biologicals/clone JY2 and TXNRD: 1:10 000 from Abcam/ ab124954. Bands were quantified by densitometry with ImageJ Version 1.46r.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!