The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

13 protocols using leica bond

1

Immunohistochemical Evaluation of p16 in OPSCC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemical expression of p16 was evaluated in all cases. In brief, deparaffinized FFPE sections of all cases were subjected to antigen retrieval using the Leica Bond protocol (Leica Biosystems) with proprietary Retrieval ER2 (ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid, pH 9.0) buffer for 20 min. A mouse monoclonal antibody against p16 (E6H4 clone, CINtec; Ventana Medical Systems, Arizona, USA) was utilized with a 1:4 dilution and detected with the Polymer Refine Kit (Leica Biosystems, New Castle, UK) on a Leica Bond autostainer. For positive immunohistochemical controls, a tonsil SCC with positive p16 expression was used. The threshold for p16 positivity was met in cases where ≥ 70% of tumor cells demonstrated strong diffuse nuclear and cytoplasmic staining. The threshold of ≥ 70% was used as it correlates with a positive HPV status in OPSCC [20 (link)]. Cases with moderate staining intensity in ≥ 70% of the cells or strong staining reactivity in ≥ 50 < 70% of the cells were categorized as equivocal.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Immunohistochemical Profiling of Lymphoma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemical stains were performed on the cell blocks using Leica Bond (Leica Biosystems, Buffalo Grove, IL, USA) and Ventana Benchmark Ultra (Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, AZ, USA) immunostainers with satisfactory negative and positive controls. The antibodies, clones, dilutions, and manufacturers are summarized in Table 2. Expression of BCL6, CD10 and MUM1 in the lymphoma cells was evaluated with a cutoff of 30% for each antibody. The cell-of-origin (COO) of the selected cases was classified into either germinal center B-cell (GCB) or non-GCB subtype according to the Hans algorithm.55 (link) The cutoff for BCL2 and MYC expression was set at 50% and 40%, respectively, according to the literature.56 (link) Ki67 was utilized to assess the proliferation rate of lymphoma cells (0–100%). The immunostains of other antibodies were graded as negative or positive.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Diffuse Midline Glioma: Histopathological Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Tissue from all three tumors was submitted fresh from the operating room for frozen section diagnosis. Tumors were submitted for permanent section, and several 1 mm3 pieces were submitted in cell culture media (described below) for neurosphere culture. Overnight processing in formalin was performed for diagnosis. Immunohistochemistry was performed on a Leica Bond (Leica Biosystems, Buffalo Grove, IL, USA) and specimens were interpreted by a pediatric neuropathologist.
The three tumors came from H3 K27M-mutant DIPGs in children (Table 1). Specimen 1 was from autopsy and specimens 2 and 3 were from needle core biopsies. All three were diagnosed clinically as diffuse midline glioma, H3 K27M-mutant based on the immunohistochemical expression of H3 K27M mutant protein and absence of H3 K27 trimethylation, in accordance with the 2016 WHO classification of CNS tumors, which was in place at the times of clinical diagnoses [16 ]. Such cases are termed “diffuse midline glioma, H3 K27-altered” in the 2021 WHO 5th Edition [17 ]. All three had infiltrating astrocytic tumor cells with irregular, hyperchromatic nuclei, and fibrillar cytoplasmic processes. Specimen one had necrosis and microvascular proliferation, whereas 2 and 3 had only mitotic activity.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Automated IHC Staining of PTB in Tumor Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Automated immunohistochemistry on all samples was performed at CMH. FFPE sections were stained with a monoclonal antibody to PTB, clone SH54 (ThermoFisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), using a Leica Bond autostainer (Leica Biosystems, Buffalo Grove, Illinois) and a polymer refine detection system. After heat antigen retrieval, the antibody was applied at a 1:100 dilution in a low pH buffer. Deparaffinized slides were incubated with a primary antibody, secondary antibody, and a polymer conjugate. A single brown color staining was visualized by incubation with DAB chromogen. To visualize the characteristic granular nuclear staining, the hematoxylin counterstain step was omitted. Breast carcinoma tissue served as a positive control. Stained sections were analyzed and graded for the extent of staining, which was reported as a percentage of stained cells in viable areas (from 0 to 100%). PNC staining prevalence was determined by 3 independent reviewers. Immunohistochemistry was performed on 48 paraffin-embedded tissue blocks, including 39 from the primary untreated tumor, 5 after neo-adjunctive treatment, and 4 from metastatic sites.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Multiplex IHC Analysis of FFPE Tissue

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Five-micron sections of FFPE tissue were assessed for PD-L1 expression, TILs, JAK1, and phosphorylated JAK1 protein expression using the following antibodies and detection methods following the manufacturer's protocol: PD-L1 (1:3 dilution, clone SP142 [Springer Biosciences], Leica Bond [Leica Biosystems]), CD3 (predilute, clone 2GV6, Ventana and Ventana BenchMark Ultra [Ventana Medical Systems]), and CD8 (1:25, clone CD8/144B [Dako], Ventana BenchMark Ultra [Ventana Medical Systems]), JAK1 (1:500), and phosphorylated JAK1Tyr1034/1035 (1:100) (Cell Signaling Technologies Inc.).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Brain Metastases Tissue Collection and Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Brain tumor metastases from primary lung (n = 46), breast (n = 27), melanoma (n = 46) and colorectum (n = 21) tumors were selected from those collected at Dunedin and Hamilton hospitals. Following surgery, the tumors were either fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin or snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80 °C. Fixed tissue was processed into paraffin wax and embedded. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumors were cut on a microtome into either 4 µm (immunohistochemistry) or 5 µm (RNAscope) tissue sections that were placed onto coated slides (Leica Bond, Leica Biosystems, Wetzlar, Germany). Paraffin-embedded formalin-fixed tissues were available for all tumors and additional frozen tissue was also available for 51 tumors. Matching primary tumors were available for 24 cases (7 breast, 6 colorectal, 7 lung and 3 melanoma). The clinicopathological data associated with all samples are outlined in Table 1. The inclusion criteria were brain tumor metastases with tumor tissue removed between 2010 and 2016 diagnosed as breast, lung, colorectal or lung metastases with only tissue from the first brain tumor metastasis analyzed in cases with recurrent brain tumors excised. Ethical approval (reference LRS/10/09/037 and MEC/08/02/061) was obtained in New Zealand and all procedures followed institutional guidelines. All individuals provided written informed consent.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunohistochemical p16 Assessment Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry for p16 was evaluated on formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded tissues. Briefly, 3 to 5 micron sections were cut, deparaffinized, and subjected to antigen retrieval consisting of 20 minutes in the Leica Epitope Retrieval Solution. Expression was assessed using the p16 mouse monoclonal antibody (E6H4 clone, Ventana Medical Systems, Tucson, Arizona) on a Leica Bond autostainer (Leica Biosystems, Inc). A positive interpretation was rendered when strong, diffuse nuclear and cytoplasmic staining was present in greater than 70% of tumor cells on both histologic samples and cell blocks. P16 immunohistochemistry was performed on cell blocks (n=2) or from the corresponding tissue sections (n=21), if it had not been determined on prior material (n=17). P16 IHC for those cases not previously stained was interpreted by one pathologist (KE) and one pathology trainee (MFW). In cases where the Cobas and p16 result were discordant, HR HPV RNA ISH was performed.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying PD-L1 Expression in Brain Metastases

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Specimens from resected (intracranial) brain metastasis tissue (n = 64) and available matched extracranial tumor tissue (n = 44, comprising 9 resected primary lung tumors, 9 lung biopsies and 26 lymph node biopsies) were considered for analysis. Each case was reviewed by a pathologist or neuropathologist. FFPE tissue sections of 2–3 µm thickness were used for hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining and immunohistochemistry (IHC). IHC staining for PD-L1 was performed using a Leica Bond immunostainer (Leica Biosystems) according to manufacturer’s protocols. Briefly, tissue sections were deparaffinized, rehydrated, and heat-induced antigen retrieval was performed by incubation in CC1 mild buffer (Ventana Medical Systems) for 30 min at 100 °C. Subsequently, tissue sections were incubated with the primary monoclonal antibody rabbit anti-PD-L1 (Clone E1L3N, Cell Signaling, #13684) at 1:200 for 60 min followed by incubation with HRP-conjugated secondary antibody (Leica Biosystems) for 32 min, DAB incubation and counterstaining of nuclei with hematoxylin. Tonsil served as positive control. PD-L1 expression was quantified by assessing the tumor proportion score (TPS), i.e. assessing the percentage of tumor cells with positive membranous staining relative to all vital tumor cells. Only cases with at least 100 evaluable tumor cells were included [25 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Multiplexed Immunofluorescence Staining of CRC TMAs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Multiplexed immunofluorescence iterative staining of the CRC TMAs was performed as previously described [19 (link)] using the Cell DIVE™ technology (Cytiva, Issaquah, WA; formerly GE Healthcare). This involves iterative staining and imaging of the same tissue section with 60+ antibodies and is achieved by mild dye oxidation between successive staining and imaging rounds. In total, there were 13 staining rounds using the antibodies described above and DAPI was imaged in each round. The Leica Bond (Leica Biosystems) was used for antibody staining and the IN Cell 2200 was used for imaging. Staining and image recording was repeated twice for S6 due to staining failure. Exposure times were set to fixed values for all images of a given marker.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantification of Tumor-Infiltrating Tregs via IHC

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed on automated Leica Bond immunostainers (Leica Biosystems, Buffalo Gove, IL,) as described previously [6 (link)]. Briefly, formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections cut at 4-5 μm thickness were de-paraffinized and subjected to antigen retrieval prior to incubation with an anti-FOXP3 monoclonal antibody (BioLegend, San Diego, CA. USA). Stains were visualized with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine and hematoxylin counterstain and interpreted by a board-certified pathologist [24 (link)]. The intensity of tissue infiltration by Tregs (FOXP3+) was expressed as number of positive cells per microscopic 40x high-power field evaluated on an Olympus BX41 light microscope (Leica Biosystems, Wetzlar, Germany).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!