The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

μlite spectrophotometer

Manufactured by Harvard Bioscience
Sourced in United Kingdom

The μLITE spectrophotometer is a compact, high-performance device designed for precise measurement of absorbance in various biological and chemical applications. It features a dual-beam optical system and a wavelength range from 190 to 1100 nm, allowing for accurate analysis of samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 protocols using μlite spectrophotometer

1

RNA Isolation and cDNA Synthesis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Three pools of 5 larvae from each treatment group were used for RNA isolation. Following imaging at 15 dpf, RNA Later (Fisher Scientific) was added to 5 larvae per treatment group and stored at −80°C until RNA isolation. Though individually housed from 5–15 dpf, larvae were randomized from the initial exposure vials to minimize batch effects. RNA was isolated using the GeneJET RNA purification Kit (Fischer Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The isolation protocol followed was developed for use of whole-tissue purification. The concentration of RNA and the purity of samples were analyzed using a μLITE spectrophotometer (BioDrop, Cambridge, UK), and all samples had quality A260/A280 ratios ranging from 1.8–2.1. After quantifying RNA, 500 ng RNA was reverse transcribed into cDNA with an iScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad). These samples were diluted to a concentration of 0.25 ng/μl of cDNA in nuclease-free water and stored at −20°C until use.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Zebrafish RNA Extraction and RT-qPCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Zebrafish larvae were thawed, transferred to lysis buffer, and sonicated by pulsing 3–5 times with an Emerson Industrial Branson Sonifier® (Danbury, CT). RNA isolation was performed using 2-mercaptoethanol (MP Biomedicals) and a GeneJET RNA Purification Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific) following the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA quantity and quality were assessed using a BioDrop μLITE spectrophotometer (Cambridge, United Kingdom). Sample cDNA was prepared using an iScript reaction mix kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA), diluted 1:9 with nuclease-free water, and stored at −80 °C until processing. Each RT-qPCR sample was prepared using 10 μL of 2× iQ SYBR® Green Supermix (Bio-Rad), 5 pmol (250 nM) each of forward and reverse primers (1 μL total), 5 μL of nuclease-free water, and 4 μL (10 ng) of cDNA. Samples were run on 96-well plates in a CFX Connect Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad), and samples were analyzed using the CFX Manager software (Bio-Rad). RT-qPCR was carried out in duplicate for the cyp1a and ahr2 genes. The β-actin (actb) gene was used as a housekeeping gene, and its transcription did not change significantly across exposure groups.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

RNA Extraction and Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from the third mature leaf in three biological replicates by the CTAB method (Doyle and Doyle, 1991 ) with minor modifications. The concentration and quality of RNA were determined using BioDrop μLite spectrophotometer and integrity was assessed by agarose gel electrophoresis. RNA samples were treated with DNase I and reverse transcription was performed using the MMLV-RT kit (Biolabmix, Russia). The efficiency of DNaseI treatment and reverse transcription were tested by agarose gel electrophoresis and by qRT-PCR. The results of this verification were evaluated by the presence/absence of a PCR product in RNA samples before and after DNaseI treatment, and by observing the size of PCR fragments in RNA samples before treatment and its cDNA synthesis. Only those samples that confirmed the absence of genomic DNA contamination were included in further analysis of gene expression. Actin (F: 5′-CCATCACCAGAATCCAAGAC-3′; R 5′-GAACCCGAAGGCGAATAGG-3′) (Hao et al., 2014 (link)) was taken as a reference gene and results were quantified using a Light Cycler 96 analyzer (Roche, Japan). The relative gene expression level was calculated by the Livak and Schmittgen (2001 (link)) using the following algorithm: 2−ΔΔCq, where:
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Fecal DNA Extraction with CTAB

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A modified version of the CTAB protocol was used for DNA extractions due to the likely presence of PCR inhibitors in the fecal samples (Ramón‐Laca et al., 2015). Each swab was placed in a lysis mix of CTAB and proteinase k (20 mg/ml) and left overnight at 56°C. This was followed by the addition of RNaseA and incubation of the mixture at 37°C for 30 min. DNA was extracted using chloroform–isoamyl alcohol and then precipitated using isopropanol and ethanol. A negative control consisting of purified water was included in each set of extractions. DNA concentration was quantified using a BioDrop μLITE spectrophotometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!