The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

7 protocols using rabbit liver glycogen

1

Quantifying Polysaccharide Composition in LBs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lugol’s iodine was prepared as a 20×stock (1.5 M KI and 100 mM I2). To detect LBs in preliminary purifications, 50 µL samples from purification fractions were boiled for 15 minutes on a 95°C heat block, clarified by centrifugation ( 16,000×g for 1 min), and 35 µL of the supernatant was added to 50 µL 1×Lugol’s iodine and 15 µL water for 100 µL total (Fig. S2A). To analyze iodine absorbance of polysaccharide from LB purifications, Pflüger-isolated polyglucosan fractions were added to 50 µL 1×Lugol’s iodine for 100 µL total and absorbance was measured at 550 nm. Absorbance was graphed alongside glucose-based concentrations to illustrate the fractionation of polyglucosan and glycogen into supernatant and pellet fractions, respectively (Fig. S2B). For spectral scans, 50 µg LBs, rabbit liver glycogen (Sigma), and potato amylopectin (Sigma) were solubilized by boiling for 30 min and added to 50 µL 1×Lugol’s iodine for 100 µL total. Absorbance scans were performed at 400–800 nm in 10 nm steps.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Glycogen Extraction and Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Glycogen extraction from livers was carried out as previously described [48 (link)]. Glycogen was extracted from ~100 mg of liver from each sample and resuspended in 1 ml of H2O. Glycogen content was measured with a spectrophotometer (490 nm absorbance; Elx800 microplate reader, BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA) using the phenol-sulphuric acid method [4 (link)]. A standard curve was plotted to calculate glycogen concentrations using serial dilution of rabbit liver glycogen (Sigma-Aldrich). Glycogen content was measured in duplicate with 6–8 biological replicates per genotype and sex.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunostaining of Astrocyte Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Norepinephrine (NE) (Cat# A7257), rabbit liver glycogen (Cat# G8876), octanol (Cat# 297887), 18α-glycyrrhetinic acid (Cat# G8503), acetonitrile (Cat# 100030), quinine (Cat# 69311), dihydroxybenzylamine (Cat# 858781), sodium octyl sulfate (Cat# O4003), sulfuric acid (Cat# 339741) and a monoclonal anti-GFAP (RRID:AB_477010) antibody were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Trypsin (Cat# 06369880103) and collagenase (Cat# 05349907103) were obtained from Roche CustomBiotech (Indianapolis, IN, USA). DME/F12 medium (Cat# 11320082) (1:1) and fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Cat# 16000044) were obtained from ThermoFisher (Grand Island, NY, USA). Phenol (Cat# 33517) was obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Goat anti-mouse IgG antibody conjugated to Cy5 (AlexaFluor 647) (RRID: AB_2535804) and donkey anti-rabbit IgG antibody conjugated to FITC (AlexaFluor 488) (RRID: AB_2535792) was obtained from ThermoFisher (Grand Island, NY, USA). Blocking peptides for Cx43 were synthetized in Genscript (Piscataway, NJ). Cx43 blocking peptide, Gap26, VCYDKSFPISHVR, and Scrambled peptide, PSFDSRHCIVKYV were used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Glycogen Synthase Regulation Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Rabbit liver glycogen and pancreatic α-amylase were from Sigma. Microcystin-LR was from Enzo Life Sciences. NADH was from Apollo Scientific. Antibodies against pS8 GYS1 and pS8/S11 GYS1 were kindly donated by D. Grahame Hardie (University of Dundee). pS641 GYS1 (#3891) and total GYS1 (#3893) antibodies were from Cell Signaling Technologies. Total GYS1 (sc-81173) and PP1c (sc-7182) antibodies were from Santa Cruz Biotechnology. pS641/645 GYS1 (S486A, 3rd bleed) and GN1 (S197C, 1st bleed) antibodies were generated by the Division of Signal Transduction Therapy (DSTT) at the University of Dundee as previously described [4] (link). Peroxidase conjugated secondary antibodies were from Jackson Immunoresearch. Glutathione Sepharose 4B, NHS-Sepharose FF, Superdex 200 3.2/300, Q-Sepharose HP and Enhanced Chemiluminescent (ECL) reagent were from GE Healthcare. Gel filtration standards were from Bio-Rad (151-1901). All other reagents, unless otherwise indicated, were from Sigma.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Placental Glycogen Content Quantification

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Formalin fixed-paraffin embedded placental tissue was sectioned at 5 μm through the mid-line using a Leitz 1512 rotary microtome (Leica). Placental sections were stained with haematoxylin and eosin to assess gross morphological structure and layer proportions. Placental glycogen was stained using a periodic acid Schiff (PAS) stain. Briefly, sections were dewaxed and rehydrated before incubation with 0.5% periodic acid (Sigma, UK) for 90 min. Sections were then washed and incubated in Schiff's reagent (Sigma, UK) for 15 min, before dehydrating and mounting in DPX. The percentage of positive magenta staining was measured by a blinded operator using Image J software.
Total placental glycogen content was determined using the protocols of Lo et al. (1970) and Rampon et al. (2008) with some modifications [24 ,25 (link)]. Briefly, 10 mg of placental tissue was homogenised in 30% KOH saturated with Na2SO4 (Sigma, UK) and incubated at 100 °C for 30 min, followed by cooling on ice. Glycogen was precipitated in 100% ethanol and separated by centrifugation at 1,000×g for 30 min. Glycogen standards were prepared using Rabbit Liver Glycogen (G8876; Sigma, UK), with concentrations ranging from 400 μg/ml to 12.5 μg/ml. Samples and standards were combined with 5% phenol with H2SO4 (Sigma, UK) to initiate a colorimetric change. Absorbance was read at 490 nm on Benchmark Bio-Rad microplate reader.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Production and Characterization of β-Limit Dextrins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cyanobacterial glycogens, rabbit-liver glycogen (Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO) and waxy maize starch (Cargill, Minneapolis, MN) were used for production of β-limit dextrins. Samples (50 mg) were pre-wetted with water (0.5 mL), and then 4.5 mL of DMSO was added. The resulting mixtures were heated in a boiling water bath for 1 h and were precipitated with 5 volumes of absolute ethanol. The air-dried pellets were dissolved in 50 mM acetate buffer (pH 4.8), and boiled for another 0.5 h. After cooling down the dispersions to ambient temperature, sweet potato β-amylase (10 units mg−1 glucan, Sigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO) was added. The hydrolysis reaction proceeded at 37°C for 24 h, and then another 10 unit mg−1 of β-amylase was added to completely hydrolyze the external α-1,4 linkages for 24 h. The resulting samples were precipitated with 2 volumes of ethanol, washed twice with 75% (v/v) ethanol, and then once with 100% ethanol. The air-dried pellets, β-limit dextrins, were used for further analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Thermal Stability Assay for Carbohydrate Binding

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Experiments were performed using a CFX96 Real-Time PCR system (BioRad). Individual reactions contained 2 μM protein and 5X SYPRO Orange Protein Gel Stain (Invitrogen). DP7/maltoheptaose (Elicityl), DP24 maltodextrins (Elicityl), or rabbit liver glycogen (Sigma) were used as substrates in DSF reactions. Melting was monitored from 20 to 90°C at a ramp rate of 1°C/50 sec. Melting temperature (Tm) was calculated from a Gaussian fit of the first derivative of the melting curve. Data analyses and binding fits were determined using the Prism software (Graphpad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!