The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Lsm 510 inverted

Manufactured by Zeiss
Sourced in Germany

The LSM 510 inverted is a laser scanning confocal microscope system designed for high-resolution imaging of biological samples. It features an inverted optical configuration, allowing for easy sample handling and observation. The system utilizes a selection of laser wavelengths to provide versatile excitation options for a wide range of fluorescent probes. The LSM 510 inverted enables optical sectioning and high-contrast imaging of specimens.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using lsm 510 inverted

1

Characterizing CAF Morphology in 3D Matrices

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All fluorescent images were acquired using a Zeiss LSM510 inverted confocal microscopes. For immunofluorescence analysis, the cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde in PBS and permeabilised using 0.2% Triton X‐100 in PBS before blocking with 3% bovine serum albumin in PBS. Cells were stained with DAPI and Phalloidin‐TRITC (Sigma #P1951) for 2–6 h at RT. The shape and length of CAFs grown within 3D matrices were determined using Volocity software. Images were thresholded based on F‐actin staining and cells identified in an automated manner.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Fluorescence Imaging of Brain Probe Delivery

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Images of the brain slices with the delivered probes and the antibody staining were acquired using fluorescence microscopy (10x; Zeiss Axio Observer; Oberkochen, Germany) and confocal microscopy (20x; Zeiss LSM-510 inverted; Oberkochen, Germany). Gd(rhodamine-pip-DO3A) and Texas Red 3 kDa dextran were excited at 562/40 nm and emissions were filtered at 624/40 nm. The Alexa Fluor 488 and FITC stained slices were excited at 470/40 nm and emissions were filtered at 525/50 nm.
The detected dose was measured with the normalized optical density (NOD) 35 (link). All pixels with intensities higher than the mean of the control region plus twice its standard deviation were summed for both the control and targeted regions of interest. The sum of the targeted region was subtracted by that of the control region to obtain the NOD. The distribution of the probes was quantified with the coefficient of variation (COV), defined as the standard deviation over the average fluorescence intensity in the targeted region. This was calculated for six slices for each treated brain by selecting regions of interest around the targeted left hippocampus using Matlab® (2016a, The Mathworks, Natick, MA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Imaging PldA protein localization in A549 cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A549 cells were seeded at 1.5 × 104 cells/well in a 35 mm glass bottom plate (MatTek) in DMEM, 10% FBS, and 1% penicillin/streptomycin 18 h prior to treatment. PldA and PldA K169E were labeled using the Alexa Fluor 488 Protein labeling kit according to the manufacturer's protocol to generate WT-488 or K169E-488. 1 μM WT-488 or K169E-488 was incubated with A549 cells for 4 h at 37 °C in 5% CO2. Extracellular PldA was removed by washing three times with PBS followed by addition of 10% FBS in DMEM. Cells were imaged using Zeiss LSM 510 inverted microscope at 5 and 7 h postincubation using a 63× 1.4 N.A. (Plan-Apochromat) oil immersion objective. Acquisition settings were held constant unless noted otherwise.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Gut Immunostaining in Female Flies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Female flies were used for gut immunostaining in all experiments. The entire gastrointestinal tracts were dissected out and fixed in PBS plus 8% EM grade paraformaldehyde (Polysciences) for 2 h. Samples were washed and incubated with primary and secondary antibodies in a solution containing PBS, 0.5% BSA, and 0.1% Triton X-100. The following primary antibodies were used: mouse anti-Pros (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank), 1:100; rabbit anti-LacZ (MP Biomedicals), 1:1,000; rabbit and mouse anti-PH3 (EMD Millipore), 1:1,000; goat anti-GFP (Abcam), 1:1000; rabbit anti-Pdm1 (aa 95–256; gift from X. Yang, Institute of Molecular and Cell Biology, Singapore, Singapore); DRAQ5 (Cell Signaling Technology), 1:5,000; Hoechst (Life technologies), 1:500. Alexa Fluor–conjugated secondary antibodies were used at 1:400 (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc., and Invitrogen). Guts were mounted in 70% glycerol and imaged with a confocal microscope (LSM 510 inverted; Carl Zeiss) using 10×, 20×, and 40× oil objectives (imaging medium: Immersol 518F; Carl Zeiss). The imaging temperature was room temperature. The acquisition and processing software was LSM Image Browser (Carl Zeiss) and image processing was done in Photoshop CC (Adobe).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying Dendritic Spine Morphology

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Fixed neurons were permeabilized with 0.2% triton-X 100 in 1× phosphate buffered saline (PBS), blocked with 2% bovine serum albumin, and co-stained with rabbit anti-GFP (Invitrogen) and mouse anti-PSD-95 (UC Davis/NIH NeuroMab Facility) antibodies and corresponding secondary antibodies conjugated with Alexa 488 or Alexa 568. Confocal images were obtained using a 63× objective (Zeiss LSM 510 inverted) with sequential acquisition settings of 1024 × 1024 pixels. Each image was a z-series projection of 3–4 images at 0.5-μm depth intervals and averaged four times. Morphometric analysis and quantification of PSD-95 and dendritic spines were performed using Image J software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA) by an experimenter who was blinded to experiment conditions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Quantifying FRET using Acceptor Photobleaching

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
A detailed description of the FRET technique can be found elsewhere [38 (link)]. The Förster constant (R0) for the donor-acceptor pair used in this study, Alexa488 and Alexa568, is 62Å. To determine FRET, we quantified the quenching of donor fluorescence by performing acceptor photobleaching. FRET measurements were performed using a Zeiss LSM510 inverted confocal microscope, Apochromat ×63/1.4 NA oil immersion objective and the Zeiss LSM510 software version 2.8. Briefly, fluorophores were excited with 488 and 543 nm lasers and images collected separately. The acceptor, Alexa568, was then irreversibly photobleached in a selected adequate region by continuous excitation with a 543 nm laser for about 30 s. Residual Alexa568 and Alexa488 image was obtained under the same settings as prebleach images, identical regions on individual cells were outlined in the photobleached area and processed using ImageJ. In a typical experiment, 15–20 cells were measured for each sample. As a positive control for FRET, we examined GFP-Schip1-expressing cells immunostained for the GFP using Alexa568-labeled IgG as a secondary antibody.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!