The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

7 protocols using dtg 60 instrument

1

Multimodal Characterization of Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) micrographs have been obtained using a Cambridge 90 instrument, equipped with an energy dispersive X-ray microanalysis (EDX) facility. Fourier Transform IR (FTIR) analysis was performed by a PerkinElmer Spectrum 100 spectrometer, at room temperature, from 4000 to 650 cm−1, with a resolution of 2.0 cm−1. A universal Attenuated Total Reflectance (ATR) sampling accessory was used for the measurements, which were made directly on samples, without any preliminary treatment. ThermoGravimetric Analyses (TGA) have been carried out by a Shimadzu model DTG-60 instrument. TGA curves have been recorded at a heating rate of 10 °C min−1, under static air atmosphere, from 35 to 700 °C. Analyzed sample mass varied between 8.0 and 11.0 mg.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Synthesis and Characterization of Novel Heterogeneous Catalysts

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Aldehydes, triazine, benzene-1,3-disulfonyl chloride, 2-aminopyridine, malononitrile, chlorosulfonic acid, and solvents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Company. Also, the thin-layer chromatography (TLC) of the commercial plates (silica gel 60 F254), were purchased from Merck Company. FT-IR spectra were recorded in a spectrophotometer (PerkinElmer 781). To investigate the surface morphology of the catalyst FE-SEM images and EDX analyses provided by a Sigma ZEISS, Oxford Instruments Field Emission Scanning Electron Microscope. The morphology of prepared catalysts was investigated using TEM by a Philips CM 120, Netherlands and microscope with an accelerating voltage of 150 kV. X-ray diffraction was performed using a Philips X'pert MPD diffractometer with a Cu operating at a current of 100 mA and a voltage of 45 kV, with the Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 0.154056 nm) at the 2q range of 10–80 and scanning at the speed of 0.05° per minute. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was carried out using Shimadzu DTG-60 instrument at 25 to 600 °C. The pore volume and pore size distribution were resulted from the desorption profiles of the isotherms using the Barrett–Joyner–Halenda (BJH) method. NMR spectra (Bruker 400 MHz) were used to confirm product structure by DMSO-d6 as a solvent on a Bruker DRX-400 spectrometer.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Characterization of Copper Nanocatalyst

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The reagents and solvents used in this project were purchased from various chemical companies and were used directly without additional purification. The reactions were monitored by thin-layer chromatography (TLC) over gel-60 F254 plates. Chromatography columns were packed using 63–200 mesh ASTM silica gel. Melting points were measured via an electrothermal 9100 apparatus. FT-IR spectroscopy was done using KBr disks in a AABFT-IR (FTLA 2000) spectrophotometer. 1H NMR (300 and 600) and 13C NMR (75 MHz) spectra were recorded with a Bruker spectrometer. High-resolution mass spectra of the products were recorded with an Agilent quadrupole time-of-flight liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry system. XRD spectroscopy patterns of as-prepared samples were obtained by an XPert Pro Panalytical setup. The morphology and size of particles were recorded using a scanning electron microscope (Zeiss-SIGMA VP). TEM images were obtained by a Zeiss EM10C (100 kV) system. The specific surface area and pore size of the synthesized nano-catalyst were determined by N2 sorption–desorption. The TGA curves of samples were obtained using a Shimadzu DTG-60 instrument. The copper content of the nanocatalyst was determined ICP-OES. The elemental analysis of the catalyst was achieved by EDX using a Zeiss SIGMA VP system.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterization of CoFe2O4-DAN-Cu(II) Nanocatalyst

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Chemical materials were supplied from Sigma-Aldrich and Merck and used as received. The X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) data of the CoFe2O4-DAN-Cu(ii) nanocatalyst were obtained using a Co radiation source with a wavelength of λ = 1.78897 Å, 40 kV. The morphology of the nanocatalyst was investigated by FESEM-TESCAN MIRA3, operating at a voltage of 30 kV, which was gold-coated using a sputtering coater. FT-IR spectra of the prepared samples were recorded from a KBr disc using a VRTEX 70 model BRUKER FT-IR spectrophotometer, in the range of 400 and 4000 cm−1. 1H NMR spectra were recorded using a Bruker 400 MHz NMR AVANCE 300 spectrometer. TGA was performed using a Shimadzu DTG-60 instrument in the temperature range 25–800 °C. Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) was used for the elemental analysis. The copper content in the catalyst was evaluated by inductively coupled plasma-optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES; 730-ES Varian). TEM analysis of the catalyst was performed using a Zeiss-EM10C transmission electron microscope.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Thermal Characterization of Material

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TGA was performed on a DTG-60 instrument
(Shimadzu, Beijing, China) at a heating rate of 10 °C min–1 from room temperature to 600 °C under a nitrogen
atmosphere with a flow rate of 100 mL min–1. The
glass transition temperature (Tg) was
assessed with a DSC 200F3 analyzer (NETZSCH, Beijing, China). A vacant
aluminum crucible was used as a reference. The samples were heated
at a rate of 5 °C min–1 from −100 to
50 °C under a N2 atmosphere. The DMA was carried out
by means of a thermal analyzer (TA Instruments model Q-800) from −100
to 300 °C, at a frequency of 1 Hz and heating rate of 3 °C
min–1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Thermal Degradation Analysis of PZA and Excipients

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The thermal degradation of pure PZA, excipients
(GDL, sodium alginate, and PHBV), and the OF were examined using thermogravimetric-differential
thermal analysis (TG-DTA). The samples pre-weighed for analysis were
placed in aluminum pans and gradually heated from room temperature
to 800 °C at a heating rate of 10 °C min–1. Dry nitrogen was used to purge the samples at a rate of 50 cm3 min–1 in a calibrated system using a DTG
60 instrument (Shimadzu, Japan). The peak degradation and weight loss
were analyzed to determine the thermal stability of the samples.25 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterization of Inorganic Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Unless otherwise specified, all reagents and starting materials were of reagent grade or better and purchased from standard suppliers and used as received. Water was purified by reverse osmosis. Where anhydrous solvents were required, HPLCgrade solvent was either distilled from standard drying agents or dried by passing over a sealed column of activated alumina.
Powder X-ray diffraction patterns were obtained using a GBC-MMA diffractometer operating at 1.0 kW with samples mounted on 1" quartz substrates. Simultaneous thermogravimetric-differential thermal analysis (TG-DTA) traces were obtained using a Shimadzu DTG-60 instrument fitted with a FC-60A flow rate controller and TA-60WS thermal analyser using measuring parameters of 10 °C per min under nitrogen flow of 20 cm 3 min -1 . Infrared spectra were obtained using a Shimadzu IR Affinity-1 FTIR, fitted with a MIRacle 10 single reflection ATR accessory. Microanalyses were recorded by Mr Alan Carver (University of Bath Microanalysis Service) or Gillian Maxwell (University College London Microanalysis Service) or the Microanalytical Unit, Australian National University, Australia or the Campbell Microanalytical Laboratory, University of Otago, New Zealand.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!