The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Stata 11 for windows

Manufactured by StataCorp
Sourced in United States

STATA 11 for Windows is a statistical software package that provides a comprehensive set of tools for data analysis, modeling, and visualization. It offers a wide range of capabilities, including data management, regression analysis, time series analysis, and more. STATA 11 is designed to be user-friendly and efficient, making it a popular choice among researchers, analysts, and professionals in various fields.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

11 protocols using stata 11 for windows

1

Evaluating HCQ's Impact on Lipid Levels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mean and standard deviation (SD) for each lipid level and 2 time points, pre- and postindex dates for all participants (HCQ users) and for the subgroups of statin users+HCQ users versus HCQ users, were obtained.
Differences in the mean for each lipid levels, pre- and postindex HCQ use, were evaluated using the student’s t-test.
To explore the effect of the variables, considering effect modifiers (age, sex, race, statin use, post CRP values >10 mg/L), a multivariable regression model was performed (analysis of variance/analysis of covariance) for the change in different lipid levels.
For sensitivity analysis, marginal means of change were calculated for each lipid level by race and by controlling other variables.
All analyses were performed using STATA 11 for Windows (StataCorp; College Station, TX, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Analyzing Contingency Tables: Weighted Chi-Square

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pearson’s Chi squared test was used for analysing contingency tables. Data were weighted, based on probability of selection and non-response. Pooled sample weights were used for descriptive statistics. STATA 11 for Windows (STATA, College Station, TX, USA) was used for the analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Indian Men

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Due to limited number female participants (n = 70), only 800 male data were considered for the analysis. The present analysis is based on 791 male for whom all the variables were available. Means and percentages with 95 % confidence intervals adjusted for age were given for normally distributed continuous variables and categorical variables as needed. Age standardized prevalence by direct standardization method were estimated on the basis of 2001 census data before performing statistical tests [18 ]. Differences between the groups of means and proportions adjusted for age were tested by analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and logistic regression. Measures of association between anthropometric indices (BMI, WC and WHR) and cardiometabolic variables (SBP, DBP, FBG and 2hBG) were tested by Pearson’s correlation coefficient. In logistic regression analyses controlling by age, was assessed between (a) general obesity and (b) central obesity (WC and WHR) as categorical independent variables and, taken one by one, diabetes and hypertension as dependent variables. Both STATA 11 for Windows (STATA Co., College Station, TX, USA) and PASW statistics version 21 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) were used as needed. A p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Prevalence and Determinants of Obesity in India

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The present analysis is based on 2,293 participants (842 male and 1,451 female) for whom all the variables were available. Both STATA 11 for Windows (STATA Co., College Station, TX, USA) and PASW statistics version 18 for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) were used as needed. Means and Percentages with 95 % confidence intervals adjusted for age were given for normally distributed continuous variables and categorical variables as needed. Age specific and age standardized prevalence by direct standardization method were estimated on the basis of 2001 census data before performing statistical tests [20 ]. Differences between the groups of means and proportions adjusted for age were tested by analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and logistic regression. Chi-squared test was used to test the trend. In the analysis, general (defined by BMI) and central obesity (defined by WC) were considered as the dependent variable. Socio- demographic and dietary factors were included in the regression analysis to identify variables independently associated with overweight and obesity. In the analysis, only those variables which were identified to be independently associated in univariate analyses were included in multinomial models. Statistical inference is based on 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) and the significance level was set at 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Neuropathy Prevalence and Risk Factors

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The calculated sample size was 114, which assumed a 40% prevalence of neuropathy, [14] (link) 0.09 precision and 0.05 significance. Prevalence and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated. Chi-square or Fisher's exact test, where appropriate, were used to explore potential factors related to DPN. Multivariable analysis was performed using Poisson analysis for calculating prevalence ratios. STATA 11 for Windows (Stata Corp, College Station, TX) was used for analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Statistical Analysis with SPSS and STATA

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All analyses were performed using the computer software SPSS 21.0J for Windows (IBM SPSS Japan Inc., Tokyo, Japan) and STATA11 for Windows (STATA Corp., College Station, TX, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Poisson Regression Analysis of Depressive Mood

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analysis was performed using STATA 11 for Windows (STATA Corporation, College Station, TX, US). Initially, an assessment of bivariate associations of the socio-demographic and migration variables with depressive mood was performed. Our multivariable modeling followed a hierarchical approach in order to disentangle the contributions of age, gender and sociodemographic variables [32 (link)]. Poisson regression models [33 (link)] were used to calculate adjusted prevalence ratios (PR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). This approach has been described as a better alternative for the analysis of cross-sectional studies with binary outcomes than the usual logistic regression that yields odds ratios. An additional advantage of this technique is that appropriate controlling for confounding variables, and its interpretation, is possible [33 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Statistical Analysis of Numerical and Categorical Data

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were tabulated in Microsoft Excel®. For the numerical variables, the analysis was done with measures of central tendency. For the categorical variables, the chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was used, with a significance of less than 0.05 and 95% confidence. A correlation between age and period of analysis was initially performed using the Shapiro–Wilk test; due to the nature of the variables, the Spearman test was applied. The analysis was performed in the data analysis and statistical software Stata 11 for Windows (Stata Corp LLC, College Station, TX, USA)®.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Aggression and Weapons Carrying Odds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were analyzed using Stata 11 for Windows (StataCorp, 2009 ). Multivariate analysis was conducted using polynomial regression to determine the odds of aggression (comparison of five distinct levels) and logistic regression models to determine the odds of weapons carrying (any versus none) as related to each independent variable. No statistically significant differences were found between baseline and follow-up for the outcome variables. As such, the analysis did not control for baseline; however, intervention group status was included as a control variable to account for potential confounding.
Only those independent variables found to be significantly associated at the bivariate level (p<0.1) with each outcome were included in the multivariate model for that outcome. As the overall sample was comprised of primarily African American (96.6%) sixth graders (Mean age = 11.97; SD = 1.10), comparisons were not made based on race or age.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Pupillometry for Diabetes and Neuropathy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Comparisons between studied groups were performed using Student’s t-test or a chi-squared test, as appropriate. Pupillometry variables, as numerical values, were compared as a screening tool for diabetes and cardiac autonomic neuropathy, and the AUC was calculated. According to the Youden index [20 (link),21 (link)], the best threshold for each pupillometry variable was selected, reporting sensitivity and specificity, as well as likelihood ratios, positive and negative. In addition, the 'rocreg' command in STATA was used to verify the effect of some variables (e.g. age), in the receiver–operator curve calculations. In addition, some extra analyses, according to site and participants characteristics were also performed. STATA 11 for Windows (STATA Corp, College Station, TX, USA) was used for analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!