The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Phoenix 8

Manufactured by Certara
Sourced in United States

Phoenix 8.1 is a software package for modeling and simulation in pharmacology and toxicology. It provides tools for data analysis, visualization, and reporting.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

Lab products found in correlation

11 protocols using phoenix 8

1

Isoflurane Pharmacokinetics Model

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The time course of the isoflurane concentration ( FE ISO) during the previous steps was fitted to a pharmacokinetic compartmental model (Phoenix 8.1, Certara USA Inc.), and compared to the ideal behavior of a one-compartmental model for a volume of distribution of 40 L (28 L of the breathing system + 12 L of the lung simulator) and a clearance equal to the input.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Pharmacokinetics of Ivacaftor in Nasal Epithelia

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After quantitation, non-compartmental analysis (NCA) methods Phoenix 8.1 (Certara, Princeton, NJ) were used to calculate the AUC12; time to reach maximum concentration in plasma (Tmax); maximum concentration in plasma (Cmax); half-life (t1/2), oral clearance (CL/F) and apparent distribution volume (V/F). We collected nasal epithelia at 6h post-dose to determine cellular ivacaftor concentrations. At visits 2 and 3, repeat collection coincided with plasma concentration collections. We used the effective concentration to achieve 90% of the maximal clinical effect on lung function (EC90), 250 ng/mL (EC84 for sweat chloride), as a benchmark for comparison. The primary analysis used regression models assuming linear association. For comparisons across visits, generalized linear mixed models, assuming a non-normal distribution, was used for comparisons.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Multiparametric PK-PD Modeling for Anticancer Drug

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data were fit using Nelder-Mead optimization in Phoenix 8.1 (Certara) running on the Windows 10 operating system on a 64-bit Intel Core-i7 2.9 GHz processor, with 32 GB RAM. The fit was performed sequentially: PK data were fit first, and parameters for that part of the model fixed prior to fitting the PD parameters. These parameters were then fixed prior to fitting the efficacy parameters. For PK, PD, and thrombocytopenia models, a na€ ve-pooled approach was used, in which data from all studies was fit simultaneously, to yield a single, global estimate of all parameters. For the efficacy model, because the antitumor response was heterogeneous, a nonlinear mixed-effects approach was taken, with interindividual variability on certain parameters (details in Supplementary Data).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Iohexol Clearance-based GFR Measurement

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The GFR was determined as the total body clearance of iohexol. The plasma concentration-time data was analysed by non-compartmental modelling using Phoenix® 8.1 (Certara, USA). The GFR was calculated using following equation:
where AUC 0→inf is the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero extrapolated to infinity, CL is the total body clearance and Dose is the dose of iohexol administered. The GFRs were indexed to body surface area (BSA) according to the formula of Dubois-Dubois [38] . Blood iohexol concentrations, obtained by VAMS (C IOH,VAMS ), were corrected according to patients' haematocrit to estimate the plasma levels (C IOH,Pl ) of iohexol using following formula:
The latter formula is applicable since it has previously been demonstrated that iohexol is not distributed to red blood cells [23, 39] .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Pharmacokinetic Analysis of MP1 in Plasma

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Non-compartmental pharmacokinetics analysis was performed on Phoenix® 8.2 (Certara Corporation, Mountain View, CA, USA) to determine plasma pharmacokinetic parameter of MP1 in plasma. Peak plasma concentration (Cmax) and time for the peak plasma concentration (Tmax) was obtained from visual inspection of the concentration-time plot. The area under the curve (AUC0–∞) was estimated using the linear trapezoidal method from 0–tlast and extrapolation from last time point to infinity based on the observed concentration at the last time point divided by the terminal elimination rate constant (k).
The elimination half-life (t1/2) was calculated using Equation (12). Clearance (CL) was calculated using Equation (13) and the apparent volume of distribution of the elimination phase (Vd) were calculated using Equation (14). The tissue to blood (Kp) ratio was calculated by using Equation (15).
t1/2=0.693k
CL=Dose (mgkg)AUC0
Vd=Dose (mgkg)KAUC0
KP=Concentration in TissueConcentration in Blood
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Pharmacokinetics of CBDA in HEMP

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pharmacokinetic analysis for repeated dosing was performed on each HEMP animal to determine the pharmacokinetics of CBDA using non-compartmental methods using computer software (Phoenix 8.2, Certara, Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA) using methods similar to Kleinhenz et al.22 (link). Relevant pharmacokinetic parameters are defined and reported in Table 2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Non-Compartmental Pharmacokinetic Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Non-compartmental analysis was performed on the plasma concentration-time profiles using Phoenix 8.4 (Certara LP, NJ, USA). All dosing groups were included in the analysis, except for the IR administration data because of the low plasma concentrations (around LOQ). The following pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated: area under the plasma concentration-time curve, from 0 to infinity (AUC0−inf); maximal plasma concentration (Cmax) and time to maximal plasma concentration (Tmax); terminal elimination half-life; elimination rate constant and mean residence time. Total body clearance and volume of distribution after IN and PO administration were not corrected for their respective bioavailabilities. The relative bioavailability of the IN administration when compared with the commercial oral product was calculated according to the following formula:
Due to the dose discrepancy between the PO and IR administration (100 mg) and the IN administration (20 mg) and to facilitate comparison of the systemic exposure between the administration routes, the AUC and Cmax of PO/IR and IN were normalized for dose by dividing by 100 and 20, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Pharmacokinetic Analysis of Intranasal Ketamine

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Plasma concentration-time profiles were modelled by non-compartmental analysis (NCA) using Phoenix 8.4 (Certara, NJ, USA). Plasma concentrations measured at 360 and 480 min after ketamine administration fell below the LOQ and were therefore not taken into account for pharmacokinetic analysis. The following major pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated: AUC0-4h area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 4 hours post-administration; AUC0-∞ area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to infinity; Cmax maximal plasma concentration (IN); C0 plasma concentration at time zero (IV); Tmax time to maximal plasma concentration (IN); Vd volume of distribution; Cl total body clearance; T1/2el terminal elimination half-life; kel elimination rate constant. Vd and Cl values after IN administration were not corrected for IN bioavailability (F). The absolute IN F, expressed as percentage, was calculated according to the following formula:
F=AUC0infIN/AUC0infIV*100.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Pharmacokinetics of Vincristine in Adults and Pediatrics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Individual adult vincristine concentration‐time data were obtained by digitizing published PK profiles (GetData Graph Digitizer, version 2.26).17, 18, 19 Pediatric vincristine concentration‐time data were obtained from a PK study of 25 patients with localized Wilms tumors, with ages ranging from 5 months to 9 years. Samples were analyzed at Newcastle University (UK) using a validated liquid chromatography‐mass spectrometry assay, as described previously.9 A subset of these concentration‐time data has previously been published.9 Pediatric concentrations were dose‐normalized to account for the range of doses given (0.3–1.8 mg). Noncompartmental analysis was performed on the digitized adult concentration data and the pediatric concentration data using Phoenix 8.0 (Certara USA, Inc., Princeton, NJ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Pharmacokinetic and Statistical Analyses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Pharmacokinetic analyses were performed in Phoenix 8.0 (Certara USA, Inc., Princeton, NJ), and physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling was performed GastroPlus v9.7 (SimulationsPlus, Redwood City, CA). Multivariate regression modeling was performed in Stata v13 (College Station, TX: StataCorp LP). Plots were generated in GraphPad Prism version 7.00 for Windows (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, www.graphpad.com). Statistical significance was declared for p-values less than 0.05.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!