The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

46 protocols using theta probe

1

Surface Wettability and Composition Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Water contact angle
measurements were made by placing a ∼5 μL drop of deionized
water via a syringe with the immediate capture of
the droplet image using Measurements & Automation software (National
Instruments Corp. Austin, USA). Images were analyzed using ImageJ
with the LB-ADSA plugin (EPFL), with a minimum of three droplets (six
angles) being recorded per sample. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy
was performed at the Nexus NanoLAB (Newcastle University, UK) using
a Theta Probe instrument equipped with a monochromated AlKα
source (Thermo Scientific). A pass energy of 200 eV and a step size
of 1.0 eV was employed for all survey spectra, while a pass energy
of 40 eV and a step size of 0.1 eV were used for high-resolution spectra
of the elements of interest. A flood gun was used for charge compensation.
Data acquired were analyzed using CasaXPS software. pKa and log P of the surface presented
molecules were calculated from structural information using ACDlabs
software v12.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Characterization of PEDOT Composite Surface

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The surfaces of bare SUS316L substrate and PEDOT composite films were examined using a field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM, JSM6700F, JEOL, Japan), transmission electron microscope (TEM, JEOL JEM-2100), atomic force microscope (AFM, AFM, Dimension Edge, Bruker, America) operated in tapping mode, and X-ray photoelectron spectroscope (XPS, Thermo Scientific, Theta Probe, USA). The water contact angle was measured using a contact angle goniometer (DSA 100, Krüss GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) at room temperature. The contact angle was taken as an average of three repetitions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Phase and Composition Analysis of TiO2 and N-TiO2

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The phase identification of pure TiO2 and N-TiO2 was carried out using an X-ray diffractometer (XRD) (TTRAX 3, Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan). The surface composition and electron binding energy of TiO2 and N-TiO2 was measured using an X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) (Theta probe, Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The morphology was observed using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) (JSM6510, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). The UV-Vis spectroscopy (CARY 300nc, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was used to record the absorption spectra of the samples.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Characterization of MoTe2 Thin Films

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Raman spectra were collected in a spectrograph system (Andor Technology; model: SR-500i-D2-R) with a high-performance laser source (Cobolt SambaTM; wavelength 532 nm and laser power of 5 mW) and CCD detector (model: DV416A-LDC-DD). The silicon vibration peak located at 520 cm−1 was utilized to calibrate the measurement system. The elemental composition was determined using XPS (Thermo Fisher Scientific Theta Probe, Al Kα X-ray source). The carbon 1 s peak was used to calibrate the reference of binding energy. The measurement was performed in an ultra-high vacuum condition (~10−9 torr) and with a beam size of 400 μm. For XPS depth profiling, in-situ Ar sputtering was utilized with an etching rate of 0.298 nm per second for the as-sputtered MoTe2 film. The spectra of binding energy were deconvoluted using the Shirley background correction and characterized based on NIST XPS database24 (link). The relative sensitivity factors of Mo 3d5/2, Te 3d5/2, and O 1 s were 6.51, 25 and 2.88, respectively. The deconvoluted Mo 3d line shape was fit using an asymmetry distribution of LA (1.1, 2.3, 2) while others were fit using a symmetric distribution of Gaussian–Lorentzian (60).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

XPS Analysis of Cellulose Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The XPS analysis was performed using a Thermo Fisher Scientific Theta Probe (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) spectrometer. For analysis, a monochromatic Al Kα (1486.6 eV) X-ray source was used. The spectra were measured at room temperature at a pressure of ~5 × 10−8 Pa in the analytical chamber. The samples were mounted on a titanium sample holder with two-sided adhesive tape. The energy scale of the spectrometer was calibrated to provide the following values for reference samples (i.e., metal surfaces freshly cleaned by ion bombardment): Au 4f7/2–83.96 eV, Cu 2p3/2–932.62 eV, Ag 3d5/2–368.21 eV. Survey and high-resolution spectra of appropriate core levels were recorded at constant pass energies of 300 and 100 eV and with step sizes of 1 and 0.1 eV, respectively. The electrostatic charging effects were compensated by using an electron neutralizer. The binding energy scales for the cellulose samples were referenced to the C–OH component in the C 1s spectra at 286.73 eV [62 (link)] and for Ag black at 285.0 eV. After charge referencing, a Shirley-type background with inelastic losses was subtracted from the high-resolution spectra. The surface chemical composition was calculated using atomic sensitivity factors included in the software of the spectrometer corrected for the transfer function of the instrument.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy and High-Resolution Transmission Electron Microscopy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The XPS data were recorded using
the Thermo Fisher Theta Probe using monochromatized Al Kα (1.487
keV) with charge neutralization. The spectra were corrected by the
background subtraction with the Shirley method and charge-corrected
using C 1s peak (284.5 eV). The peak intensities were determined by
the least-squares curve fitting and converted into the atomic percentage
using relative sensitivities. The high-resolution transmission electron
microscopy (HR-TEM) images were obtained using a JEOL JEM-2100F high-resolution
transmission electron microscope (HR-TEM) at 200 kV.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Atomic-Scale Characterization of GO Nanosheets

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The height and width of the resultant GO nanosheets were investigated by atomic force microscopy (AFM; Nanocute, Hitachi High-Tech Sci. Co.). X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were collected on a Rigaku SmartLab 3 kW X-ray diffractometer equipped with a Cu Kα (λ = 0.154 nm) radiation source. A field-emission Scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) images were recorded on a SU-8000 (Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation) microscope. Elemental analyses and chemical-state profiles were conducted using an X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) apparatus (ThetaProbe, Thermo Fisher Scientific). The C 1s XPS spectra were fitted based on of the contributions of eight groups (–COOH, C<svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" version="1.0" width="13.200000pt" height="16.000000pt" viewBox="0 0 13.200000 16.000000" preserveAspectRatio="xMidYMid meet"><metadata>
Created by potrace 1.16, written by Peter Selinger 2001-2019
</metadata><g transform="translate(1.000000,15.000000) scale(0.017500,-0.017500)" fill="currentColor" stroke="none"><path d="M0 440 l0 -40 320 0 320 0 0 40 0 40 -320 0 -320 0 0 -40z M0 280 l0 -40 320 0 320 0 0 40 0 40 -320 0 -320 0 0 -40z"/></g></svg>
O, C–O–C, C–OH, sp3 C–C, C–H defects, C–N, and sp2 CC bonds). Fe 2p3/2 and Fe 2p1/2 XPS spectra were fitted based on the contributions from four groups (Fe2+ + N, Fe3+ + N, Fe oxide, and Fe satellite).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Characterization of HfOx Thin Films

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The thickness of the film deposited on the Si substrate was measured using spectroscopic ellipsometry (UVISEL, Horiba, Kyoto, Japan). XPS (Theta Probe, Thermo Fisher Scientific Co., Waltham, MA, USA) was used to analyze the chemical bonding of the HfOx films and to ascertain the presence or absence of La in the HfOx films. The morphological properties of the deposited films were characterized by AFM (XE-100, Park Systems, Suwon, Korea). Furthermore, the crystalline phase and crystallite size and orientation were determined by GI-XRD (SmartLab, Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan) and TEM (Tecnai F20 G2, FEI, Hillsboro, OR, USA). For the cross-sectional TEM image, a sample was prepared using the focused ion beam system, and for the plan view TEM image, samples were prepared using the ion milling system.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy Calibration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Measurements were performed on a Theta Probe (Thermo Fisher Scientific)
System. The X-ray source was a monochromated Al Kα source at 1386.6 eV. The spectrometer was calibrated to 368.21 eV
binding energy (BE) of the Ag 3d5/2 line for metallic silver
and the linearity was corrected to BE of 932.62 eV for the Cu 2p3/2 line and 83.96 eV for the Au 4f7/2 line. Charge
compensation was done using a flood gun for low-energy electrons and
argon ions at 1 eV. The binding energy scale was calibrated using
the C 1s component at 285.0 eV (typical of C–C).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

XPS Characterization of NW Surface Functionalization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), electron spectroscopy for chemical analysis, was used for determining the functionalization of the NW surface [29 (link)]. XPS measurement was performed using a Thermo Fisher Scientific Theta Probe with a monochromatic X-ray source (Al Kα, 1486.6 eV) and a concentric hemispherical analyzer. Binding energy of 284.6 eV for the C 1s peak was calibrated as the reference. XPS analysis was performed by National Nano Device Laboratories (Hsinchu, Taiwan).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!