The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

40 protocols using x pert highscore plus software

1

X-Ray Diffraction Analysis of Materials

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X-ray diffraction experiment were performed with a Siemens D5000 diffractometer (Siemens AG, Munich, Germany) at RT equipped with CuKα source and a rear graphite monochromator. The samples were placed on a glass substrate and fixed at the table of the goniometer. The diffraction patterns obtained were analyzed with the X’Pert Highscore Plus software (Malvern Panalytical, Worcestershire, UK) in order to identify the crystallographic phases present in the studied materials.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Crystalline and Amorphous Structure Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The crystalline and amorphous regions of samples were investigated using an XRD instrument (Bruker, AXS D8, Bremen, Germany). Samples were scanned from 5° to 60° of 2θ angle with a step size of 0.02°/sec. The X-ray source was from the CuKα with 1.5140 of the wavelength. Xpert High Score Plus software (Malvern Panalytical Ltd, Enigma Business Park, Grovewood Road, Malvern, UK) was used to analysis of the XRD.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Crystalline Phase Identification of SAPP Pigment

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X-ray diffraction (XRD) was employed to identify the crystalline phases of the strontium aluminium polyphosphate powder pigments (SAPP). A X-ray diffractometer (Bruker D8 Advance) was used to obtain the diffraction pattern of the powder SAPP pigment. The diffractometer was fitted with a copper anode (Cu Kα X-ray, 1.54 Å) while the excitation conditions were 40 keV and 40 mA. The diffraction pattern was collected in the range of 2θ Bragg angles from 10° to 120° while the step size was 0.02o per 4.5021 seconds. The diffraction pattern was analysed with the X’Pert HighScore Plus Software (Malvern Panalytical) and the crystalline phases of the SAPP pigment were identified with reference to the International Centre for Diffraction Data (ICDD) database.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Nanoparticle Characterization Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Morphology of the synthesized nanoparticles were characterized by high-resolution analytical transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEM-2100, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) and scanning electron microscope (SEM, S-3400N II, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan). The specific surface areas (SSA) were measured with nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherm via the Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) method. Prior to the measurements, the samples were degassed at 180 °C for 3 h. The average pore sizes, total pore volumes and pore size distributions were obtained with nitrogen desorption data, using the Barrett-Joyner-Halenda (BJH) model. Both were carried out with a Micromeritics Tristar II 3020 (Micromeritics Instrument Corp., Norcross, GA, USA), using nitrogen gas as an adsorbate at 77 K. The phase composition and crystal structure of the synthesized particles were determined by X-ray diffraction (XRD, PANalytical X’Pert Powder Pro, Malvern Panalytical, Almelo, The Netherlands) using Cu Kα1/2 radiation (λα1 = 1.5406 Å) in the range of 10°–90°(2θ). A standard silicon was measured to determine the instrumental broadening, in order to calculate the average crystallite sizes of silver based on the XRD data using Scherrer’s equation [16 (link)]. Analysis of the XRD patterns was performed using X’Pert HighScore Plus Software (Malvern Panalytical, Almelo, The Netherlands).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Polymorphic Analysis of Oleogels

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
An X-ray diffractometer (PANalytical Empyrean model, Almelo, The Netherlands) was used to measure the polymorphic types of the oleogel samples following the Cj 2-95 method [19 ]. The oleogel samples were kept at ambient temperature overnight and loaded at that temperature to the instrument. The measurement was completed with a Cu source X-ray tube (λ = 1.54056 Å, 40 kV and 40 mA) and angular scans (2θ) from 2.0 to 50° at 2°/min scan rate. X’Pert HighScore Plus software (Malvern Panalytical Ltd., Royston, UK) was used for data analysis [13 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

XRD Analysis of Crystalline Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The crystalline structure and XRD spectra were measured by means of the X-ray diffraction (XRD) method. A high-resolution X-ray diffractometer (Malvern Panalytical, Malvern, Worcestershire, UK) (with Cu K-alpha radiation (λ = 0.154184 nm) and a Ni filter with a generator voltage of 40 kV and a current of 30 mA was used. The radiation was measured with a proportional detector. The samples were measured in θ–2θ geometry over a range of 5° to 80°. All measurements were carried out at room temperature with a step size of 0.01° and a counting time of 5 s per data point. The crystalline phases were identified using the X’Pert High Score Plus software (v3.0e, Malvern Panalytical, Malvern, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Polymorphism Analysis of Oleogel Samples

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
PANalytical Empyrean model (The Netherlands) X-ray diffractometer and Cj 2-95 method were used to assess the polymorphic forms of the oleogel samples 16) . The oleogel samples were kept at ambient temperature overnight and loaded at ambient temperature to the instrument s sample holder with a spatula. A Cu source X-ray tube (λ=1.54056 Å, 40 kV and 40 mA) was produced angular scans (2θ) from 2.0° to 50° by 2°/min scan rate to test the samples. The X Pert HighScore Plus software (Malvern Panalytical Ltd., Royston, UK) of the instrument was used for data analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

X-ray Diffraction Analysis of Zero-Valent Iron

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Unreacted-and reacted ZVI from the column experiments were analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) at the University of Arizona. The reacted samples were dried overnight in a lyophilizer (LABCONCO, Kansas City, MO, USA). Diffractograms were collected using Cu K-α radiation (λ = 1.5406 Å) on a Panalytical X'Pert PRO with ultra-fast X'Celerator detector (Malvern Panalytical, Malvern, UK) between 5° to 80° (2θ) at 0.02-degree 2θ steps. The generator voltage was 45 kV, and the tube current was 40 mA. Data analysis, peak identi cation, and assignment of crystalline phase were performed using the X'Pert HighScore Plus software (Malvern Panalytical, Malvern, UK) with ICCD PDF-2 diffraction reference les (Degen et al. 2014) (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Oleogel Crystalline Polymorph Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Polarized light microscopy images of the oleogels were taken with an Olympus CX31 polarized light microscope (PLM, Olympus Optical Co., Japan) and an attached CCD color camera (Canon) at room temperature 11) .
To determine the crystalline polymorph type, the oleogel samples were analyzed with a PANalytical Empyrean model (The Netherlands) X-ray diffractometer according to method Cj 2-95 12) . Samples loaded at ambient temperature (23±2 ℃) to the holder by plastering the previously prepared oleogel sample into the sample holder by a spatula, and then angular scans (2θ) were performed from 2.0° to 50° by 2°/min scan rate. There was a Cu source X-ray tube (λ=1.54056 Å, 40 kV and 40 mA) . Data analysis was com-pleted with X Pert HighScore Plus software (Malvern Panalytical Ltd., Royston, UK) 13) .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Characterization of Oleogel X-ray Diffraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the oleogels were assessed with a PANalytical Empyrean model (The Netherlands) X-ray diffractometer. Radiation was applied at a scanning rate of 0.02/0.6 (sec) within a 2.0-50°( 2θ) range under 45 kV and 40 mA CuKα (λ = 1.54056 Å). Data analysis was completed with X'Pert HighScore Plus software (Malvern Panalytical Ltd., Royston, UK) (Yilmaz et al., 2015) .
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!