The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Abi 3130xl

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom, Germany, France

The ABI 3130XL is a genetic analyzer designed for DNA sequencing and fragment analysis. It features a 16-capillary array and can process multiple samples simultaneously. The ABI 3130XL utilizes fluorescence-based detection technology to analyze genetic samples.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

189 protocols using abi 3130xl

1

Microsatellite genotyping of seahorse species

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA from filament samples was extracted by standard phenol–chloroform protocol, according to Sambrook42 . Following DNA extraction, amplification of 12 highly polymorphic microsatellite loci (Electronic supplement S1) isolated for H. guttulatus (or obtained by cross-amplification in H. hippocampus) was performed as described in Pardo et al.43 (link) and van de Vliet et al.44 (link). PCR reactions with labelled primers were performed using standard procedures, and amplified products were run on an ABI 3130XL (Applied Biosystems) automated sequencer. Genotype scoring was performed using STRand (https://vgl.ucdavis.edu/informatics/strand.php). It was assumed that a single panmictic population was being assessed31 (link), and downstream analyses of the 2013 sample pooled all locations into a single year population. To filter for missing data, the missingno function of the poppr45 (link) R-package46 was used, removing loci with more than 25%, and individuals with more than 10% missing data, respectively. Genotyping errors and null alleles were estimated using calculations by Summers and Amos47 (link), Dempster et al.48 , Brookfield49 (link), and Chakraborty et al.50 (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

DNA Repair Genes Sequencing in Finnish Breast Cancer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Initial sequencing was previously performed for 189 Northern Finnish breast cancer patients with indication of hereditary disease susceptibility [62 cases with young disease onset (≤40y), and 127 cases with family history of breast or breast and ovarian cancer]12 . Selection and sequencing of the 796 DDR genes (Supplementary Table S4), and annotation of the variants are described in Mantere et al.12 . Briefly, the selected genes encoded (1) proteins identified as being part of DNA repair processes using the GeneOntology searches and STRING v.9.0 (n = 612)39 (link), 40 (link), and (2) novel BRCA1 and PALB2 interacting proteins identified in protein complex purification assays performed with epitope tagged versions of the proteins in HeLaS3 cells (n = 184). wANNOVAR41 (link), SureCall (Agilent technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV)42 (link) were used for annotation and visualization of the variants. All variants selected for further studies were confirmed by Sanger sequencing (ABI3130xl, Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Microsatellite Genotyping Protocol for Parasitoid

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA extraction was performed using a salting out method (Sunnucks and Hales 1996 (link)). Microsatellite loci were amplified by PCR using fluorescence labeled primers. Each PCR amplification was prepared in a 25 μL reaction volume containing 1 μL genomic DNA, 1× PCR buffer (20 mmol/L Tris-HCl, 50 mmol/L KCl), 2 mmol/L MgCl2, 0.2 mmol/L of each dNTP, 0.25 mmol/L of reverse primer, 0.25 mmol/L of M13 primer, 0.25 mmol/L of forward primer, and 0.5 U of Taq polymerase (Hufbauer et al. 2001 ). Electrophoresis was performed in a capillary sequencer (ABI 3130xl; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Finally, the multilocus genotype for each parasitoid individual was obtained by uniting the allele combinations from all microsatellite loci after reading the sequencing electropherograms using the GENEMARKER software (Softgenetics, State College, PA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Bacterial Community Structure Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Bacterial community structures were monitored by amplifying the hypervariable regions V1–V3 of the 16S rRNA gene with the general bacterial primers fD1 and 5′FAM-labeled PRUN518r (Mikkonen et al. 2011 (link)). The volume of one PCR reaction was 50 μL, containing 2 μL undiluted DNA extract, 0.2 mM of each dNTP (Thermo Scientific), 0.3 μM of each primer (Oligomer), 0.7 mg mL−1 BSA (Thermo Scientific), 1× PCR buffer (Biotools), and 1 U DNA polymerase (Biotools). The amplification was done in a DNA Engine DYAD thermal cycler (MJ Research Inc., USA) with the following program: 5 min at 95 °C followed by 28 or 30 cycles of 45 s at 94 °C, 1 min at 55 °C, 1 min at 72 °C, and finally 5 min at 72 °C. The PCR products were checked by agarose gel electrophoresis (1.5 % agarose gel run at 100 V for 1 h). Fragment analysis by polyacrylamide capillary electrophoresis (ABI 3130 XL, Applied Biosystems) was outsourced to DNA Sequencing and Genomics Laboratory Core Facility, University of Helsinki, Finland, using GeneScan 600 LIZ (Applied Biosystems) as sizing standard.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Ex Vivo Retrotransposition Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ex vivo retrotransposition assay was performed as follows. Approximately 3 × 105 Sf9 cells in a 12-well plate were transfected with 800 ng of the target plasmid with the TransFast™ Transfection Reagent (Promega). Subsequently, these cells were infected with SART1Bm at MOI1. Plasmid DNA was extracted 72 h after infection. The PCR assay was conducted for SART1Bm with Ex-Taq (TaKaRa, Shiga, Japan). PCR was denatured at 94 °C for 1 min, followed by 35 cycles of 94 °C for 20 s, 60 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 50 s. The primers used for the nested PCR assay are shown in Supplementary Table 1. The PCR products were directly cloned into the pGEM-T Easy vector (Promega). The cloned products were sequenced with a BigDye Terminator cycle sequencing kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) on ABI 3130xl and 3500/3500xl Genetic Analyzers (Applied Biosystems). Sequence analysis was performed using the Vector NTI Advance 10 system (Invitrogen).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

GRIA3 Exon 15 Amplification and Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Specific primers were used for polymerase chain reaction amplification of exon 15 of GRIA3. Polymerase chain reaction products were purified with NucleoFast 96 (Macherey-Nagel, Düren, Germany) polymerase chain reaction and sequenced on an automated capillary sequencer (ABI 3130xl; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) with the dye terminator method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Genotyping of Brazilian IBV Isolates

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Two Brazilian field isolates BI/BR/Embrapa/331/2000 (accession number: KU727196, identified as IBV A isolate) and BI/BR/Embrapa/127/2006 (accession number: KU727200, identified as IBV B isolate), were isolated from clinical cases of avian infectious bronchitis in poultry flocks located in southern Brazil. Virus isolation and titration were carried out by inoculation of five 10-day-old specific pathogen-free (SPF) embryonated chicken eggs/sample via the allantoic sac route [24 (link)] and virus titers were expressed as 50% embryo infectious doses (EID50) according to the Reed & Muench method [25 ]. IBV field strains were genotyped by automated DNA sequencing (ABI3130XL, Applied Biosystems) of a 1059 bp portion of the S1 gene amplified as described [26 (link)]. The deduced amino acid sequences of S1 protein of IBV A and B isolates have 93.16% of identity, and with regard H120 strain (Massachusetts serotype) of IBV they have 69.4% and 70.0% identity, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

WFS1 and CISD2 gene exon sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The coding exons of WFS1 (NM_006005.3) and CISD2 (NM_001008388.4) were amplified with intronic primers by using standard conditions. Primers and PCR conditions are available on request. PCR products were purified with an Illustra ExoProStar enzyme (GE Healthcare, England), processed with a BidDye® Terminator Cycle Sequencing kit (Thermo Fischer, Foster City, CA, USA) and analyzed on an ABI 3130 XL automated sequencer (Applied Biosystems).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Validating Compound Heterozygous Variants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Prioritized variants were independently validated by Sanger sequencing. PCR products were either directly sequenced using GENEWIZ, ABI 3130XL, and BigDye v3.1 Terminators (Applied Biosystems) per the manufacturer’s protocols or sequenced after gel purification using the MinElute Gel Extraction Kit (QIAGEN). Sequencing primers are listed in S7 Table. All compound heterozygous variants described in the main text were confirmed on different alleles (phased) using sequenced, cloned gDNA or cDNA derived from the patients’ fibroblasts. Patients’ familial DNA was also sequenced for haplotype phasing when available. All information about the experimentally confirmed localization of compound variants within a separate allele is presented in S3 Table.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Microsatellite Marker Genotyping Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The 16 microsatellite markers described in Puppo et al. [31 (link)] were amplified using the same multiplex primer combinations, fluorescent dyes, and PCR conditions from Puppo et al. [23 (link), 31 (link)]. Genotyping was done in an ABI3130xl automatic sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Inc., Foster City, CA; USA) using an internal size standard (Genescan-500 LIZ; Applied Biosystems, Inc.). GeneMapper ver. 4.0 was used for allele scoring (Applied Biosystems, Inc.). A total of 96 individuals were genotyped two times to evaluate scoring consistency. After scoring, only markers showing data for a majority of the samples were used for further analysis. This led to the exclusion of one marker (6493). Puppo et al. [23 (link), 31 (link)] did not find any significant deviation from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, genotyping errors or a high amount of null alleles for any of the markers, so no further exclusions were necessary.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!