The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

6 protocols using fcs express 7

1

Leukocyte Characterization by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow cytometry was used to characterize leukocyte populations in the blood and colon based on total cell counts. Cell isolations for flow cytometry were stained with antibodies purchased from Biolegend. All cells were stained with Biolegend 7AAD Viability Staining Solution prior to flow analysis. Biolegend TruStain FcX (anti-mouse CD16/32) antibody was used for blocking. The following anti-mouse antibodies were used for colonic leukocyte or blood myeloid leukocyte staining: anti-CD64 (clone X54–4/7.1), anti-CD170/Siglec-F (S17007L), anti-MHC-II (M5/114.15.2), anti-CD11c (N418), anti-CD45 (30-F11), anti-Ly6C (HK1.4), anti-CD11b (M1/70), anti-Ly6G (1A8), anti-CD192/CCR2 (SA203G11), anti-CX3CR1 (SA011F11). Bone marrow-derived macrophage cultures were stained with the following antibodies from Biolegend: anti-F4/80 (BM8), anti-CD11b (M1/70), and mouse anti-Marco (579511) from Bio-Techne/R&D Systems. Flow cytometry was performed on a FACSCanto™ II (Becton Dickinson), or a BD FACSAria™ Fusion and resulting data was analyzed with De Novo’s FCS Express 7 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Membrane Potential Analysis of S. mutans

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The immediate effect of AEA on the membrane potential of S. mutans was analyzed using the BacLight Membrane Potential Kit (Molecular Probes, Life Technologies, Eugene, OR, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. An overnight culture of S. mutans was resuspended in PBS at an OD600nm of 0.3 and exposed to various concentrations of AEA. Immediately thereafter, 3,3′-diethyloxacarbocyanine iodide (DiOC2(3)) was added to a final concentration of 30 μM. After 30 min, the bacteria were analyzed by flow cytometry (LSR-Fortessa flow cytometer, BD Biosciences) using the 488 nm excitation laser, and the data were collected using the green (530 nm) and red (610/620 nm) filters [22 (link)]. The BD FACSDiva software was used for the collection of data, and the FCS Express 7 software was used to analyze the data [22 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Leukocyte Characterization by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow cytometry was used to characterize leukocyte populations in the blood and colon based on total cell counts. Cell isolations for flow cytometry were stained with antibodies purchased from Biolegend. All cells were stained with Biolegend 7AAD Viability Staining Solution prior to flow analysis. Biolegend TruStain FcX (anti-mouse CD16/32) antibody was used for blocking. The following anti-mouse antibodies were used for colonic leukocyte or blood myeloid leukocyte staining: anti-CD64 (clone X54–4/7.1), anti-CD170/Siglec-F (S17007L), anti-MHC-II (M5/114.15.2), anti-CD11c (N418), anti-CD45 (30-F11), anti-Ly6C (HK1.4), anti-CD11b (M1/70), anti-Ly6G (1A8), anti-CD192/CCR2 (SA203G11), anti-CX3CR1 (SA011F11). Bone marrow-derived macrophage cultures were stained with the following antibodies from Biolegend: anti-F4/80 (BM8), anti-CD11b (M1/70), and mouse anti-Marco (579511) from Bio-Techne/R&D Systems. Flow cytometry was performed on a FACSCanto™ II (Becton Dickinson), or a BD FACSAria™ Fusion and resulting data was analyzed with De Novo’s FCS Express 7 software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Calcein Green Staining of VERO E6 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Uninfected VERO E6 cells were subjected to the full inactivation protocol (S1). Cells were then stained with 10uM of calcein green (Invitrogen, C3100MP) and incubated for 20 minutes at room temperature. Flow cytometry data were then collected and analyzed using instrument BD Accuri C6 and FCSexpress 7 software (Version 7.12.0007, respectively).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Flow Cytometry of Stem Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Flow Cytometry was performed through the UCI Stem Cell Research Center Flow Cytometry Core using the BD Fortessa. 200,000 cells were processed for each of the samples, and data was analyzed using FCS Express 7. Plots were designed displaying 50,000 events each and reflect identical fluorescent compensation values.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Phenotypic Analysis of CD14+ Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The phenotype of the CD14+ cells was assessed at Day 0 right after isolation and on Day 7. To collect the adherent cells on Day 7, the cells were washed once with PBS and then covered with 1 mL 2.5 mM EDTA and refrigerated on ice for 1 hour. The cells were labeled with monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) from the Monoclonal Antibody Center at Washington State University (https://vmp.vetmed.wsu.edu/resources/monoclonal-antibody-center, Pullman, WA). The panel consisted of a negative control, and mAbs specific for CD14 (CAM36A), CD163 (LND68A), CD172a (DH59B), CD209 (209MD26A), and CD205 (ILA53A). All mAbs were developed in mice. Briefly, the cells were washed and then suspended in first wash buffer and divided into 15 mL conical tubes in 100 µL aliquots. The cells were incubated for 15 minutes with 50 µL each of the primary monoclonal antibodies as previously specified (Davis et al., 2007 (link)). The cells were washed and then incubated with 100 µL of the goat anti-mouse secondary antibody Alexa Fluor® 488 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, MA) for 15 minutes. The cells were then washed once with second wash buffer, resuspended in 2% PBS buffered formaldehyde, transferred to flow tubes, and stored at 4°C until flow cytometry was performed. Samples were run on a BD FACS Calibur™ and analyzed using FCS Express 7.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!