The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Kapa sybr fast qpcr

Manufactured by Roche
Sourced in United States

KAPA SYBR FAST qPCR is a ready-to-use master mix designed for fast and sensitive real-time PCR amplification and detection. It contains all the necessary reagents, including a proprietary hot-start DNA polymerase, for efficient qPCR reactions.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

21 protocols using kapa sybr fast qpcr

1

Quantifying BcL-2 Expression in PC-12 Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA of PC-12 cells treated was purified using TRIZOL (Sigma, USA), and the reaction was performed with the commercial kit KAPA SYBR FAST qPCR (KapaBiosystems, USA) and the equipment for Stratagene MX3000P (ThermoFisher, USA) real-time PCR. The qPCR was performed using RNA as a template, and the primers were ordered from Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, USA): BcL-2 (Forward: GATGACTGAGTA CCTGAACCG, Reverse: CAGAGACAGCCAGGAGAAATC) and β-actin (Forward: CACTTTCTACAATGAGCTGCG, Reverse: CTGGATGGCTACGTACATGG). The comparative threshold cycle values were normalized for the β-actin reference gene and the results were expressed as CT relative quantification by the 2-ΔΔCT method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative Gene Expression Analysis of Bone Marrow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted from whole BM, flushed from long bones and dissolved in Trizol Reagent (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. cDNA was produced using High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY, USA). qPCR was performed using TaqMan gene expression assay (Applied Biosystems, California, USA) or using Kapa SYBR Fast qPCR (Kapa Biosystems, California, USA). qPCR was performed on StepOnePlus real time PCR machine (Applied Biosystems, California, USA). Changes in relative gene expression were calculated using the 2−ΔΔct method, normalizing to the house keeping gene, Hprt. Primer sequences (Hylabs, Israel) and probes (Applied Biosystems) used for amplification are depicted in Table 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Targeted Cancer Gene Panel Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Library preparation was performed as previously described.37 (link) Briefly, extracted DNA was qualified using KAPA Sybr Fast qPCR (Kapa Biosystems, Boston, MA, USA). A home-made panel targeting specific exons of 35 clinically relevant cancer genes was used for amplification of regions of interest. For each sample, dual-strand libraries were prepared using a TruSeq Custom Amplicon protocol, as described by the manufacturer (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). After amplification, PCR products were purified using AMPure XP beads (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, USA) and quantified, normalized, and pair-end sequenced on a MiSeq instrument (2 × 150 cycles, Illumina). This dataset is composed of 81 samples from 59 different sequencing runs, with 25 CNVpos samples (Table 1).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

RNA Extraction and Gene Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Blood samples were centrifuged at 2000 rpm for 5 min, and the RNA was extracted in 800 μl of the precipitate with TRIzol™ reagent (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific), according to the manufacturer instructions. Extracted RNA was treated with TURBO DNA-free™ kit (Ambion®, Life Technologies) and its concentration was determined by spectrophotometry (Epoch®, Biotek Instruments). Relative gene expression was determined by real time RT-PCR assay based on SYBR-Green detection. TUBB was used as gene for normalization17 (link). cDNAs were obtained from 2 µg RNA using M-MLV Reverse Transcriptase (Promega®) and random primers (Promega®), according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. Primers to IL7R mRNA were designed using the Genbank sequence NM_002185.4 and the software Beacon Designer 8.02 (PREMIER Biosoft®) (F: 5’-CAGCAATGTATGAGATTA-3’; R: 5’-ATGGTTAGTAAGATAGGAT-3’). The PCR reaction was performed using the KAPA SYBR© Fast qPCR (Kapa Biosystems®) with cDNA (2 µl) in a final volume (10 µl), according to the Eco™ Real-Time PCR system (Illumina®) protocol. PCR amplification was performed at 95 °C for 3 min, and 45 cycles: 95 °C for 3 s, 53 °C for 15 s and 72 °C for 3 s followed by the melting curve (55–95 °C). Gene expression fold changes (FC) were determined using the 2−ΔΔCTmethod18 (link). The group used as control is indicated in each analysis.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantitative RT-PCR Analysis of mLAMP2A

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The protocol described in Section 2.2 was performed and total RNA was extracted by Trizol (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA was treated with DNase I (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and then quantified. Reverse transcription was performed using 1 mg of total RNA and random primers (Thermo Scientific, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) in 20 μL of reaction mixture using the reverse transcription reagents kit (Invitrogen, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). For PCR, a KAPA SYBR FAST qPCR (KAPABIOSYSTEMS, Sigma-Aldrich, Merck Bulgaria EAD, Bulgaria) kit was used. Reactions were made in triplicate using 2 μL of cDNA and a 0.4 μM final concentration of each primer in a 25 μL final volume. The following primers were used: β-actin, sense (5′-GATCTGGCACCACACCTTCT-3′) and antisense (5′-GGGGTGTTGAAGGTCTCAAA-3′); mlamp2a, sense (5′-AGGTGCTTTCTGTGTCTAGACCGT-3′) and antisense (5′-AGA ATA AGT ACT CCT CCC AGA GCT GC-3′). Reactions were subjected to dissociation curve analysis to exclude the possibility of nonspecific amplification. Changes for each gene were calculated using the mean of the change in the Ct values (ΔCt) normalized to the Ct values of β-actin for each sample (2−ΔΔCt).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Measuring Gene-specific Translation Efficiency

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The retrotranscription reaction was performed with 1 μg of polysomal or total RNA using the iScriptcDNA synthesis kit (Biorad) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. The obtained cDNA was used as template in aqPCR reaction with the KAPA SYBR FAST qPCR (Kapa Biosystem) and specific primers as reported in Table S3. qPCR were run in three biological and three technical replicates. The relative expression was calculated with the delta delta Ct method. Gapdh and Als2 were used as reference genes. The gene-specific Translation Efficiency (TE) was calculated as the ratio between the fold change at the polysomal level and the fold change at the total level of the gene of interest.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Quantification of BCL2 Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was purified using TRIZOL (Sigma, USA), and the reaction was performed with the commercial kit KAPASYBR FAST qPCR (KapaBiosystems, USA) and the equipment for Stratagene MX3000P (ThermoFisher, USA) real-time PCR. The qPCR was performed using RNA as template, the primers were ordered from Integrated DNA Technologies (Coralville, USA): BCL2 (Forward: GATGACTGAGTACCTGAACCG, Reverse: CAGAGACAGCCAGGAGAAATC) and β-actin (Forward: CACTTTCTACAATGAGCTGCG, Reverse: CTGGATGGCTACGTACATGG). The comparative threshold cycles values were normalized for β-actin reference gene and the results were expressed as CT relative quantification by 2-ΔΔCT method [43] (link).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

qRT-PCR Analysis of Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted by using Trizol (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, treated with DNase I (Invitrogen) and then quantified. Reverse transcription was performed using 1 μg of total RNA and random primers (Thermo Scientific) in 20 μl of the total volume of the reaction mixture using the reverse transcription reagents kit (Invitrogen). For PCR, KAPA SYBR FAST qPCR (KAPABIOSYSTEMS) kit was used. Reactions were made in triplicate using 2 μl of cDNA and 0.4 μM final concentration of each primer in 25 μl final volume. Primers were the following: β-actin, sense (5′-GATCTGGCACCACACCTTCT-3′) and antisense (5′-GGGGTGTTGAAGGTCTCAAA-3′); hHsc70, sense (5′-GGAGGTGGCACTTTTGATGT-3′) and antisense (5′-AGCAGTACGGAGGCGTCTTA-3′); hLamp2A, sense (5′-TATGTGCAACAAAGAGCAGA-3′) and antisense (5′-CAGCATGATGGTGCTTGAGA-3′). Reactions were subjected to dissociation curve analysis to exclude the possibility of nonspecific amplification. Changes for each gene were calculated using the mean of the change in Ct values (ΔCt) normalized to the Ct values of β-actin for each sample (2−ΔΔCt).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Fecal 16S rRNA Sequencing Workflow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
DNA was extracted from fecal samples (n = 144) using the DNeasy PowerSoil kit (Qiagen, Germantown, MD). DNA yield and purity were evaluated on a Nanodrop (Life Technologies Corp., Grand Island, NY) and by electrophoresis on a 0.8% agarose gel. Previously described primers and conditions were used to amplify and sequence the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene [31 (link)]. Each PCR mixture contained 17 μl AccuPrime Pfx SuperMix (Life Technologies Corp., Grand Island, NY), 5.0 μM each of the primers, and 25 ng of the template DNA. PCR settings included denaturation at 95°C for 2 min and 22 cycles of (20 seconds at 95°C, 15 seconds at 55°C, 5 min 72°C) amplification followed by final extension at 72°C for 10 min. PCR amplicons were normalized using the SequalPrep Normalization Plate (96) Kit (Applied Biosystems Inc., Foster City, CA). Normalized amplicons were pooled and quantified using Kapa SYBR Fast qPCR (Kapa Biosystems, Wilmington, MA) and sequenced on a MiSeq Instrument using a MiSeq Reagent Kit v2 following manufacturer’s instructions (Illumina, San Diego, CA). DNA from a mock community with defined composition [32 (link)] was also used to calculate sequencing error rates.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

RNA Extraction and RT-qPCR Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Total RNA was extracted using the RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg of total RNA with random hexamers using the RevertAid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Quantitative RT–PCR was performed using Kapa Sybr Fast qPCR (Kapa Biosystems, Wilmington, MA, USA) on the 7500 Fast Real-Time PCR System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). PCR reactions were carried out in biological triplicates and technical triplicates (n = 9) and relative expression was calculated using the comparative CT method with 18S ribosomal RNA expression as the reference control. See Supplementary Materials for primer sequences.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!