The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

13 protocols using 6540 q tof

1

NMR and Mass Spectrometry Characterization

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols

1H and 13C NMR spectra were obtained on a Bruker AVANCE III 400 MHz instrument using D2O, CDCl3 or DMSO-d6 as a reference or an internal deuterium lock. The chemical shift data of each signal are given in units of δ (ppm) relative to the solvent signal or tetramethyl silane (TMS) where δ (TMS) = 0.
MS analysis was conducted using an Agilent 6540 Q-TOF. A dual electrospray ionization (ESI) source was applied and operated in the positive mode.
A GC-MS analysis was conducted using an Agilent 8890 GC equipped with a DB-35MS column (60 m × 250 μm × 0.25 μm) and a 7250 Q-TOF MS. The temperature of each run was ramped from 50 to 310 °C at 10 °C min−1, and then maintained at 310 °C for 10 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Spectrometric Analysis of Compounds

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
HRESIMS were performed on a Agilent 6540 Q-TOF. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker Avance III-400 and Bruker Avance III-600 MHz spectrometers. Chemical shifts (δ) were expressed in ppm with reference to the TMS resonance. Column chromatography was performed using Silica gel [(200–300) mesh, Qingdao Marine Chemical, Inc, Qingdao, China]. Reactions were monitored by TLC and spots were visualized by heating the Silica gel plates sprayed with 10 % H2SO4 in EtOH.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Purification and Characterization of Spider Venom Toxin

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The venom of the spider species Heteropoda venatoria was collected by electrical stimulation, lyophilized and stored at −20 °C before use [71 (link),72 (link)]. For separation, the crude venom was dissolved in distilled H2O to a final concentration of about 1 mg/mL and then subjected to semipreparative RP-HPLC (C18 column, 10 µm, 10 mm × 250 mm, Welch Materials, Inc., Shanghai, China). The loaded venom components were eluted with a linear acetonitrile gradient (20–55% acetonitrile/0.1% TFA in 45 min) at a flow rate of 3.0 mL/min. The peak containing HpTx3 [17 (link)] was collected, lyophilized, and further purified to homogeneity by analytical RP-HPLC (C18 column, 5 μm, 4.6 mm × 250 mm, Phenomenex Inc., Torrance, CA, USA). The molecular weight of the toxin was determined with an ESI mass spectrometer (6540Q-TOF, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

UPLC-QTOF Metabolite Profiling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Agilent UPLC 1290II system combined with a 6540 QTOF (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was used to determine the accurate mass of the metabolites. UPLC equipped with a binary solvent delivery system, autosampler, and column compartment was used in this study. Chromatographic separation was performed on a Waters BEH C18 column (2.1 × 100 mm, 1.7 μm), and the elution conditions were as follows: 0–15 min, 5%–95% B. A and B indicate 0.1% formic acid water (formic acid:water, 0.1:100, v/v) and acetonitrile, respectively.
Sample ionization was acquired in both positive and negative modes within the mass/charge (m/z) range of 50–1000. The electrospray ionization (ESI) source operating parameters in both the positive and negative modes and the ESI–MS conditions were as follows: gas temperature, 325 °C; gas flow, 5 L/min; nebulizer, 35 psig; and sheath gas temperature, 350 °C. Internal references (purine and HP-0921) were adopted to modify the measured masses in real time, and the reference masses were m/z 121.0509 and 922.0098 in the positive-ion mode and 119.0363 and 1033.9881 in the negative-ion mode. The accurate mass of each metabolite was used for quantification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Bioactive Peptides Identification from Protein Hydrolysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein hydrolysis and identification of bioactive peptides were carried out following the methods described by Hwang et al. (2010) . PKC protein was hydrolyzed under optimal conditions by papain at a ratio of 50:1 in a phosphate buffer solution (50 mM), pH 6.5, at 65 °C using a water bath shaker at an agitation rate of 150 rpm for 6 h. The enzyme was inactivated by heating the sample at 100 °C for 10 min. The papain generated protein hydrolysate was then fractionated using a reversed-phase HPLC (1200 series, Agilent Technologies) on a semi-prep ZORBAX 300SB C18 column (9.4×250 mm, 5 μm; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The protein hydrolysate was further fractionated based on the isoelectric focusing electrophoresis using an OFFGEL system (Agilent Technology, Waldbronn, Baden-Wuerttemberg, Germany). The fraction with higher ACE inhibitory activity was selected to identify the peptide sequences using tandem mass spectrometry. Peptides were analyzed using an Ultra-High Performance Liquid Chromatography system (1290 UHPLC, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara) coupled with a high-resolution, accurate mass hybrid quadrupole-time of flight (Q-TOF) mass spectrometer (6540 Q-TOF, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara). After peptide identification, the peptide sequences were synthesized by 1st BASE company, (JTC MedTech Hub, Singapore) and used for further studies.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Acidic Reversed-Phase LC-MS Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cell supernatants were analyzed using acidic reversed-phase LC-MS on an Agilent Technologies 6540 Q-TOF, as previously described (137 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Characterization of RHA Nanoparticles

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Mass spectrum of RHA was analyzed by a high-resolution mass spectrometer (6540 QTOF, Agilent) with negative charged mode. 1HNMR and 13CNMR of RHA were analyzed by a 700 MHz NMR spectrometer (Avance III HD, Bruker) using CDCl3 as solvent. Microscopic images of RHA nanoparticles were obtained from a high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (JEM-2100, JEOL). Size and polydispersity index (PDI) of RHA and ATRA nanoparticles were measured by dynamic light scattering assay with a Zetasizer (ZS90, Malvern).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

NMR and Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Deuterated Tocopherols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were obtained in chloroform-d on a Bruker DRX 600 spectrophotometer using TMS as the
internal standard. Mass spectra were acquired on a 6540 Q-TOF (Agilent).
Column chromatography was performed using silica gel (Qingdao Marine
Chemical Co., Ltd., China). The purity of target compounds was determined
using an Agilent 1260 HPLC system which was equipped with an autoinjector,
a binary pump, and a diode array detector. The chromatographic separation
was achieved on a Diamonsil-C18 column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 μm).
The mobile phase system consisted of A (water) and B (acetonitrile).
The linear gradient program was set as follows: time (min)/% of mobile
phase B: 0/5; 60/90 for D3-TD6-T (0/30; 60/95 for D7-TD12-T). The
detection wavelength and flow rate were 210 nm and 1 mL/min, respectively.
All commercially available reagents were used without further purification
unless otherwise stated. The progress of the reactions was monitored
by analytical thin-layer chromatography (TLC) performed on homemade
HSGF254 precoated silica gel plates. Visualization was performed by
UV or development using vanillin solution in sulfuric acid and ethanol
(4/1 v/v). Yields were reported after chromatographic purification.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Organic Acids Quantification by LC-QTOF-MS

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
LC/MS analysis for organic acids was performed using an Agilent Technologies 6540 Q-TOF equipped with a Jet Spray ESI source operated in negative ionization mode at a 3 Hz scan rate in high resolution mode across mass range 50 to 1,700 m/z. The source parameters were 150°C drying 76 gas, 12 L/min drying gas, nebulizer pressure of 45 psi, sheath gas temperature 325°C, sheath gas flow 12 L/min, capillary at 2,000 V, nozzle at 0 V, fragmentor 90 V, skimmer 35 V, octopole RF 750 V. Five microliter of each sample was injected using an HTC autosampler into a 2 μL loop supplied by an Agilent 1260 binary pump. The column was a 2.1 mm × 100 mm Waters HSS-T3 C18 column with 1.8 μm packing. Buffer A was 20 mmol/L ammonium formate pH 2.9; buffer B was acetonitrile. Gradient separation began with 0.5% buffer B at 0.4 mL/min, held until 2.5 minutes, then buffer B was increased to 99.5% at 4 minutes. The stream was switched from the LC/MS to waste, and for regeneration, flow was increased to 0.5 mL/min at 5 minutes and 1 mL/min at 5.5 minutes, held until 8.5 minutes, and then decreased to 0.5 mL/min at 9 minutes. The column was re-equilibrated by a shift to 0.5% buffer B at 10.5 minutes, flow as decreased to 0.4 mL/min at 13 minutes, and held until 14 minutes. Other compounds were analyzed by ion-paired reverse phase analysis in negative mode on a 6550 Q-TOF.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Identification of GC Intermediates by UHPLC-QTOF

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Identification of GC intermediates was
achieved during PBCD/Fe-ACF treatment using an Agilent 1290
ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC, Dionex UltiMate
3000, USA) coupled with a QTOF mass spectrometer (Agilent 6540
QTOF, USA). The mass spectrometer scan was performed in negative
ion mode during analysis. Samples were withdrawn at 0, 20, and
60 min. The GC intermediates were screened based on the difference
in concentration from 0 min. Detailed information is displayed in
Text S2 in the SI.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!