The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

As mdw live cell imaging system

Manufactured by Leica

The AS MDW live cell imaging system is a specialized laboratory equipment designed for high-resolution, real-time observation and analysis of living cells. It provides a controlled environment for maintaining cell cultures during imaging sessions.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

7 protocols using as mdw live cell imaging system

1

Live-Cell Imaging for Cell Migration

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Live-cell imaging for cell migration analysis was performed using AS MDW live-cell imaging system (Leica Microsystems) controlled by the Image Pro software (version 6.3; Media Cybernetics). Cells were cultured at 37 °C in a humidified 5% CO2 atmosphere. Bright-field images were acquired every 5 min over 4.5 h. Cell migration was tracked manually using the ImageJ plugin MTrackJ and plotted with the origin of migration superimposed at 0.0.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Scratch Wound Migration Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For scratch wound migration assays, 2 × 106 cells were seeded into six-well plates in DMEM supplemented with 10% (vol/vol) FCS and 2 mM l-glutamine. After overnight incubation at 37°C in a humidified 5% (vol/vol) CO2 atmosphere, pipette tips were used to wound cell monolayers. Cells were washed in DMEM to remove detached cells, and inhibitors or DMSO was added at the required dose. Cells were maintained at 37°C in a humidified 5% (vol/vol) CO2 atmosphere and point visiting was used to allow imaging at multiple positions within the same time course. Bright-field images were acquired every 5 min over 8 h and 15 min on an AS MDW live-cell imaging system (Leica Microsystems) using a 20×/0.5 HC Plan Fluotar objective, a Coolsnap HQ CCD camera (Photometrics), and Image Pro software (version 6.3; Media Cybernetics). Cell migration was tracked manually using the ImageJ plugin MTrackJ (Meijering et al., 2012 (link)) for five cells per scratch wound. Quantification was performed using the Chemotaxis and Migration Tool (version 1.01; ibidi) in ImageJ (Schindelin et al., 2012 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Tracking Podocyte Migration Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Differentiated wild type podocytes were seeded at a density of 5,000 cell/mL per well in a 24 well cell culture cluster plate (Costar). Two wells were used for each treatment condition. Cells were then filmed using an AS MDW live cell imaging system (Leica) with a 5×/NA 0.15 HC Plan Fluotar air objective (magnification 1.5×). Point visiting was used to allow multiple positions to be imaged within the same time course, and cells were maintained at 37 °C and 5% (vol/vol) CO2. Images were collected using a Coolsnap HQ camera, and six movies (3 movies per well) were generated for each condition. To assess cell migration, the speed and directionality of 120 cells per condition (20 cells per movie) was measured using the MTrackJ plug-in of ImageJ. Cell tracking was performed over a 24-hour period. The manual cell tracking of the LPS and PAN experiments were performed by different individuals to reduce the risk of observer-bias.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantifying Cell Migration Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were grown to confluence and after 24 hours were scratched with a pipette tip before being washed once in appropriate serum containing medium and placed into fresh serum containing medium. Cells were treated with MEK inhibitors or DMSO at 1μM and cRGDfV at 2.5 μM as appropriate. Images were taken every 10 minutes for >84 time points (15 hours) for 6 different areas per condition. Cells were imaged using an AS MDW live cell imaging system (Leica) using a 20x/NA 0.50 Plan Fluotar Ph2 objective in brightfield. Micromanager imaging software and point visiting mode were used to allow multiple positions to be imaged within the same timecourse while cells were maintained at 37°C and 5% CO2. Images were collected using a Cascade II EM CCD camera (Photometrics). At least 5 cells per time-lapse position (giving 30 cells tracked per condition) were individually manually tracked using the ImageJ plugin MTrackJ [69 ] for the nucleus position every 3 frames (i.e. using 30 minute timepoint intervals). Cells were unbiasedly chosen and in general either started or ended at the leading edge of the scratch wound. The Chemotaxis and Migration Tool [70 ] was used to calculate the average speed and directional persistence for each given condition, where persistence is the ratio (displacement from initial position)/(total distance travelled).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Live Cell Imaging of Apoptosis Inducers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Cells were cultured in 24-well tissue culture plates, and treated with 1 μM Taxol, 5 μM ABT-737, or 10 μM 4-OHT as detailed in text, and imaged at 15 min intervals for 50 h, maintained at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Images were acquired on an AS MDW live cell imaging system (Leica) in brightfield using a 20× HC Plan Fluotar objective, using point visiting to allow multiple positions to be captured within the same time course. Image stacks were analysed using ImageJ, single cells identified and followed manually to determine fate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Live-cell Imaging of Mitotic Cell Fate

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In all, 1 µM Taxol (Sigma-Aldrich), 5 µM ABT737 (Sigma-Aldrich) or DMSO diluted in complete growth media was added to cells 30 min prior to imaging. Images were acquired at 15-min intervals for 48–60 h on an AS MDW live-cell imaging system (Leica) in bright field using a ×20 objective and utilising imaging software Image Pro 6.3 (Media Cybernetics Ltd). Point visiting was used to allow multiple positions to be imaged within the same time course, and cells were maintained at 37 °C and 5% CO2. Image stacks were analysed in ImageJ (National Institutes of Health), where single cells were identified and followed manually using cellular morphology to determine cell-cycle progression and fate. Cells were described as being in mitosis from the initial point at which a cell began to round, until the first frame of cytokinesis or membrane blebbing. Cells that exhibited morphology associated with apoptosis, such as membrane blebbing, shrinking of the cell body, and in the later stages, the formation of apoptotic bodies or secondary necrosis was described as having undergone apoptosis in mitosis. Cells that exited mitosis as a single cell, or as two or more non-identical daughter cells, were grouped together under the definition of having undergone mitotic slippage.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Activated HSC Migration Dynamics

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Activated HSCs were cultured in 24-well plates at a density of 5,000 cells per well. Single-cell tracks were acquired using live-cell imaging at 10 min intervals over a 24 h period (AS MDW live cell imaging system, Leica). Multiple position imaging was gathered using Image Pro 6.3 (Media Cybernetics Ltd) and a Coolsnap HQ (Photometrics) camera with a Z optical spacing of 0.2 μm. Cell movement over the 24 h period was analysed using ImageJ software with the MTrackJ plug-in. Total length of the cell track (in μm) was generated for multiple cells (details are provided in the figure legends), averaged and normalized to control. Where individual cell migration tracks are shown, the co-ordinates at 10 min intervals were plotted relative to each cell’s starting point (set at 0,0).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!