The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

3t prismafit

Manufactured by Siemens
Sourced in Germany, United States

3T PrismaFit is a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system manufactured by Siemens. It operates at a magnetic field strength of 3 Tesla, providing high-resolution imaging capabilities. The core function of the 3T PrismaFit is to acquire detailed images of the human body for diagnostic and research purposes.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

14 protocols using 3t prismafit

1

Chiari Malformation CSF Flow Modelling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Experiments were performed using an in vitro subject-specific CSF flow model of a Chiari malformation patient that was tested at five different MRI scanners at four different scanning centers. The centers were physically located as follows: Center 1, University Hospital in Cologne Germany (3T Achieva, Philips Healthcare, Best, Netherlands); Center 2, Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia, U.S.A (Siemens 3T PrismaFit, Atlanta, Georgia, U.S.A); Center 4, University Hospital in Basel Switzerland (3T, MAGNETOM Prisma, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany); Centers 3 and 5 were both located at University Hospital in Lausanne Switzerland (3T PrismaFit and 3T Tim Trio, respectively, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). To quantify repeatability, the flow model was scanned three times at each center using both 2D PC MRI immediately followed by 4D Flow MRI. To quantify reproducibility, results were compared across the five centers. Agreement between 2D PC MRI and 4D Flow CSF velocity measurements were also quantified. Results were statistically analyzed within and across MRI centers and between measurement techniques using a linear mixed effects model.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantifying Chiari Malformation CSF Flow

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Experiments were performed using an in vitro subject-specific CSF flow model of a Chiari malformation patient that was tested at five different MRI scanners at four different scanning centers. The centers were physically located as follows: Center 1, University Hospital in Cologne Germany (3T Achieva, Philips Healthcare, Best, Netherlands); Center 2, Emory University in Atlanta, Georgia, U.S.A (Siemens 3T PrismaFit, Atlanta, Georgia, U.S.A); Center 4, University Hospital in Basel Switzerland (3T, MAGNETOM Prisma, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany); Centers 3 and 5 were both located at University Hospital in Lausanne Switzerland (3T PrismaFit and 3T Tim Trio, respectively, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). To quantify repeatability, the flow model was scanned three times at each center using both 2D PC MRI immediately followed by 4D Flow MRI. To quantify reproducibility, results were compared across the five centers. Agreement between 2D PC MRI and 4D Flow CSF velocity measurements were also quantified. Results were statistically analyzed within and across MRI centers and between measurement techniques using a linear mixed effects model.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Cardiac MRI Assessment of Myocardial Function

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
At all three participating institutions, CMR was performed using a 3-Tesla (T) system (Siemens 3T Prismafit for Institution A, Siemens 3T Verio for Institution B, and Siemens 3T SKYRA for Institution C). The CMR acquisition parameters for cine imaging and T1 mapping are described in Supplementary Material. To assess left ventricular (LV) myocardial function and mass, short-axis images of the LV were acquired using a cine balanced steady-state free precession (bSSFP) sequence [16 (link)]. Three short-axis Modified Look-Locker Inversion-recovery (MOLLI) images at the base, mid-cavity, and apex were acquired for native T1 mapping [16 (link), 17 (link)]. Then, a total dose of 0.1 mmol/kg gadolinium agent (Uniray, gadoterate meglumine, Dongkook Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.) was injected. Ten minutes after contrast injection, post-contrast MOLLI T1 mapping was acquired for T1 determination in an identical location as for native T1 mapping.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Functional MRI Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Images were acquired on a Siemens TRIO 3.0T MRI system with a 32-channel phased-array head coil at the Functional Neuroimaging Unit in Montreal. Functional data were recorded using a T2* weighted gradient echo-planar imaging (EPI) sequence [repetition time (TR) = 2650 ms, echo time (TE) = 30.0 ms, flip angle = 90°, matrix size = 64 × 64]. Gradient echo phase and magnitude field maps were then acquired (45 slices, matrix size = 64 × 64, slice thickness = 3 mm, TR = 476 ms, TE short = 4.92 ms, TE long = 7.38 ms, flip angle = 60°) for the correction of image distortions and the improvement of co-registration accuracy. A T1-weighted structural scan was then acquired with an MPRAGE sequence (three-dimensional, spoiled gradient echo sequence; 176 slices, slice thickness = 1.00 mm, TR = 2300.0 ms, TE = 2.98 ms, flip angle = 9°). There was an upgrade to the MRI system during the study (MRI Siemens 3T Prisma fit). An independent-sample t-test comparing all participants in the scanner before the update (n = 40; 23 in the AUTc group and 17 in the TYP group) to all participants in the scanner after the update (n = 10; four in the AUTc group and six in the TYP group) did not show any significant difference in brain activation (visualised using p <.001, unc., k = 30 as a threshold). Nevertheless, we still controlled for the update with a covariable added through all fMRI analyses.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Multimodal Brain Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
T1-weighted imaging and diffusion imaging data were obtained using the same protocol at either the Aberdeen study site (3T Philips Achieva TX-series MRI system Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands) or the Dundee study site (Siemens 3T Prisma-FIT Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). T1 scans were processed using FreeSurfer 5.3.0 and the Desikan–Killiany atlas [22 (link)] was used for subcortical segmentation and cortical parcellation. FA and MD for white matter tracts were derived using TBSS toolkit within FSL following the ENIGMA DTI analysis protocol (http://enigma.ini.usc.edu/protocols/dti-protocols/). The John Hopkins University white matter atlas [23 (link)] was used to define white matter tracts. Full details on image acquisition and quality control measures are described in the Supplementary Materials and elsewhere [20 (link), 24 (link), 25 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Neck Posture Imaging in Healthy Participants

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Ten healthy participants (Age: mean ± STD = 22.9 ± 1.2 years old; 3 females) were scanned using a Siemens 3T Prisma-fit with a 64 head-neck coil at three neck positions (extension, neutral, and flexion), as illustrated in Fig. 1. Informed consent was obtained from each participant and appropriate padding was used to maintain the head position and ensure comfort. The study was approved by the Comité d’éthique de la recherche du Regroupement Neuroimagerie Québec. All experiments were performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Example of the head positioning in the MRI’s head coil for neck extension (A), neutral (B) and flexion (C). The bottom row shows localizers. (One of the authors is in the scanner).

The field-of-view covered the top of the head down to at least the T1 vertebrae. A 3D sagittal T2w scan was acquired for each neck position with the following parameters: SPACE sequence, TR: 1.5 s, TE: 0.12 s, matrix: 72 × 384, in-plane resolution: 0.6 × 0.6 mm2, number of slices: 384, slice thickness: 0.6 mm, pixel bandwidth: 620 Hz/pixel).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Cardiac MRI Assessment of Ventricular Function

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Functional cardiac MRI was obtained with a clinical Siemens 3T PRISMA FIT and analysed using the SyngoVia (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Ge) or the CVI42 (Circle, Calgary, California, USA) software. Left and right ventricle cardiac index (LVCI and RVCI), left and right ventricle ejection fraction (LVEF and RVEF), left and right ventricle telediastolic volume (LVTDV and RVTDV) and left and right ventricle telesystolic volume (LVTSV and RVTSV) were recorded from the MRI exam. For cardiac function parameters, standard cine in left and right chambers and short axis views were acquired. Results were normalised using reference values recently published for mean, LLN and ULN.12 (link)
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Multimodal Brain Imaging Protocol with QSM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Participants were scanned with a Siemens 3T PRISMA Fit scanner, using a 64-channel head-coil, at the University of Kentucky Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Spectroscopy Center (MRISC). The following sequences were collected for this study: a 3D multi-echo, T1-weighted anatomical image (MEMPR) and a 3D, multi-echo, gradient-recalled echo (GRE) sequence used for Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM). Several other sequences were collected during the scanning session related to other scientific questions and are not discussed further here. The MEMPR sequence had four echoes [repetition time (TR) = 2530ms; first echo time (TE1) = 1.69ms echo time spacing (ΔTE) = 1.86ms, flip angle (FA) = 7°] and covered the entire brain [176 slices, field of view = 256mm, parallel imaging (GRAPPA), acceleration factor = 2, 1mm isotropic voxels, scan duration =5.53 min]. The MEMPR sequence was used to optimize the Freesurfer cortical segmentation and improve the accuracy of the gray matter lobar masks (Van der Kouwe et al., 2008). The sequence used for QSM was a flow compensated, multi-echo, 3D spoiled GRE sequence in the sagittal plane with eight echoes (TR/TE1/ΔTE/FA= 24ms/2.98ms/2.53ms/15°). The entire brain was covered [acquisition matrix = 224×224×144, parallel imaging (GRAPPA), acceleration= 2, 1.2 mm isotropic voxels and scan duration = 6.18 min].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Robust Neuroimaging Protocol for VBM

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All participants were scanned on a Siemens 3T Prisma Fit at Washington University Medical School’s Neuroimaging Laboratories. A new navigator-guided T1 MPRAGE scan, developed to compensate for movement (Tisdall et al., 2012 (link)), was obtained using an axial acquisition in a 32-channel head coil array with a TR of 2500ms, TE of 2.88ms, TI of 1060ms, 176 slices, no gap, and field of view of 256mm. VBM preprocessing was carried out using Statistical Parametric Mapping 12’s Diffeomorphic Anatomical Registration Through Exponentiated Lie Algebra (Ashburner, 2007 ; Friston et al., 2007 ) package to warp segmented whole brain gray and white matter volumes into 1mm3 Montreal Neurological Institute space. Spatial smoothing was carried out using an 8mm full width at half maximum. Images were inspected for failed warping, ultimately no one was excluded. Brain masks were created by averaging all subject’s tissue maps and filtering out voxels with values under 0.3; the gray matter mask was then manually edited to exclude some para-orbitofrontal non-gray matter.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Comprehensive Breast MRI Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Breast MRI was performed on a Siemens 3T Prisma Fit scanner (Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany), using a dynamic contrast-enhanced protocol. The sequences included T1 2D axial high resolution, T2 axial turbo spin echo, diffusion sequences, T1 3D dynamic sequences (two pre-contrast and seven post-contrast) and a delayed T1 axial high-resolution sequence, with a total scan time of approximately 40 min.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!