The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

6 protocols using anti ach4

1

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation of Histone Modifications in Ventral Tegmental Area

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For each ChIP sample for histone modifications, VTA punches (2 punches) were collected from one control or chronic morphine-treated rat (14 days of morphine administration followed by 14 days of withdrawal) (n = 8 -11 for each ChIP). For each ChIP sample for key histone modifying enzymes and related regulatory proteins, VTA punches were pooled from two rats (4 punches) (n = 14 – 22). Anti-acH3 (rabbit polyclonal, Millipore, 06-599), anti-acH4 (rabbit polyclonal, Millipore, 06-598), anti-H3K4me3 (rabbit monoclonal, Millipore, 17-614), anti-H3K9me2 (mouse monoclonal, Abcam, ab1220), anti-H3K9me3 (rabbit polyclonal, Abcam, ab8898), anti-H3K27me3 (mouse monoclonal, Abcam, ab6002), anti-H3K36me3 (rabbit polyclonal, Abcam, ab9050), anti-mSIN3a (rabbit polyclonal, Santa Cruz, sc-994X), anti-ING2 (rabbit polyclonal, Santa Cruz, sc-134973), anti-KMT2A/MLL (rabbit polyclonal, Millipore, ABE240), anti-KMT1C/G9a (rabbit polyclonal, Abcam, ab40542), anti-SUZ12 (rabbit monoclonal, Cell Signaling, 3737S), anti-EZH2, anti-RING1A (rabbit polyclonal, Abcam, ab32644), anti-RING1B (rabbit monoclonal, Cell Signaling, 5694S), and anti-BMI1 (rabbit monoclonal, Cell Signaling, 6964S) were used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Antibodies for Transcription Regulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Following antibodies were used in Western Blot, EMSA and ChIP experiments: anti-Smad3 (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA), anti-Smad4 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Dallas, TX, USA), anti-β actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology), anti-AcH4 (Millipore, Temecula, CA, USA), anti-KLF17 (Abcam, Cambridge, UK).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation of Histone Modifications in Ventral Tegmental Area

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For each ChIP sample for histone modifications, VTA punches (2 punches) were collected from one control or chronic morphine-treated rat (14 days of morphine administration followed by 14 days of withdrawal) (n = 8 -11 for each ChIP). For each ChIP sample for key histone modifying enzymes and related regulatory proteins, VTA punches were pooled from two rats (4 punches) (n = 14 – 22). Anti-acH3 (rabbit polyclonal, Millipore, 06-599), anti-acH4 (rabbit polyclonal, Millipore, 06-598), anti-H3K4me3 (rabbit monoclonal, Millipore, 17-614), anti-H3K9me2 (mouse monoclonal, Abcam, ab1220), anti-H3K9me3 (rabbit polyclonal, Abcam, ab8898), anti-H3K27me3 (mouse monoclonal, Abcam, ab6002), anti-H3K36me3 (rabbit polyclonal, Abcam, ab9050), anti-mSIN3a (rabbit polyclonal, Santa Cruz, sc-994X), anti-ING2 (rabbit polyclonal, Santa Cruz, sc-134973), anti-KMT2A/MLL (rabbit polyclonal, Millipore, ABE240), anti-KMT1C/G9a (rabbit polyclonal, Abcam, ab40542), anti-SUZ12 (rabbit monoclonal, Cell Signaling, 3737S), anti-EZH2, anti-RING1A (rabbit polyclonal, Abcam, ab32644), anti-RING1B (rabbit monoclonal, Cell Signaling, 5694S), and anti-BMI1 (rabbit monoclonal, Cell Signaling, 6964S) were used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Comprehensive Protein Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Anti‐H4, anti‐ac‐Tubulin, anti‐CDK1, anti‐p‐CDK1(Y15), anti‐CDK2, ‐p‐CDK2(Y15), anti‐RRM1, anti‐RRM2, and anti‐AKT (Abcam), anti‐p‐S6(S240/244), anti‐p‐CDC25C, anti‐Wee1, anti‐c‐Myc (Cell Signaling Technologies), anti‐β‐actin, anti‐PARP, anti‐Bcl‐2, anti‐Bax, anti‐Mcl‐1, anti‐ERK (Proteintech), anti‐p‐AKT (T308), anti‐p‐AKT (S473) (Affinity Biosciences), anti‐Bim, anti‐Bcl‐xL, anti‐Bak, anti‐p‐ERK(T202/Y204), anti‐CHK1 (Selleck Chemicals), anti‐ac‐H4 and anti‐γ‐H2AX (Millipore) antibodies were used for Western blot analyses.
Western blotting was performed as described previously.33 Briefly, whole cell lysates were prepared by sonication in 10 mmol/L Tris‐Cl, pH 7.0, containing 1% SDS, protease inhibitors and phosphatase inhibitors (Roche Diagnostics). The samples were separated by electrophoresis on SDS‐polyacrylamide gels and transferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Thermo Fisher Scientific). After blocking in TBS buffer (150 mmol/L NaCl, 10 mmol/L Tris, pH 7.4) containing 5% fat‐free milk for 1 hour at room temperature, the blots were incubated with a primary antibody overnight at 4°C and then incubated with a fluorescent‐labelled secondary antibody for 1 hour at room temperature. Immunoreactive proteins were visualized using the Odyssey Infrared Imaging System (Li‐Cor). Western blots were repeated at least three times and one representative blot is shown.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Western Blot Analysis of Protein Acetylation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blot analysis was performed in accordance with the standard protocol. Total cell lysate was prepared using RIPA lysis buffer (Beyotime Biotechnology, Shanghai, China) with protease inhibitor cocktail. Proteins 20 µg were loaded and separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) gel and electrotransferred to nitrocellulose blotting membranes (0.2 µm; GE Healthcare Life Science, Uppsala, Sweden). Membranes were incubated with 5% non-fat milk for three hours and incubated with primary antibodies overnight at 4°C. Fluorescence-conjugated secondary antibody (goat anti-rabbit/mouse IRDye; LI-COR Biosciences, Lincoln, NE, USA) diluted in the blocking buffer (1:5000) was incubated for one hour at RT, and protein bands were detected using Odyssey infrared imaging system (LI-COR Biosciences). Primary antibodies were as follows: anti-SIRT1 (1:1000, CST), anti-Cortactin (1:1000; CST), anti-Acetylated-lysine (1:1000; CST), anti-Ac-Cortactin (1:1000; Millipore), anti-Histone3 (H3; 1:1000; CST) anti-Ac-H3 (1:1000; Millipore), anti-Histone4 (H4; 1:1000; CST), anti-Ac-H4 (1:1000; Millipore), anti-β-Actin (1:1000; CST). The protein bands were analyzed by Image J (NIH) software.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

ChIP-qPCR Protocol for Worms

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
ChIP was performed as previously described with some modifications [65 (link)]. Synchronized day 1 adult animals were collected and washed three times with PBS and subjected to three freeze/thaw cycles in liquid nitrogen and then cross-linked with PBS containing 1% formaldehyde for 20 minutes. Worms were then subjected to sonication by using QSonica Q800R2 at 4°C (550 Hz; 30 cycles; 10 s on, 30 s off) in buffer containing 50 mM HEPES pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 0.1% sodium deoxycholate, 1% Triton X-100, 0.1% SDS, 1 mM PMSF and protease inhibitor cocktail. Cleared lysates were immunoprecipitated using anti-AcH4 (Millipore 06–886), control IgG (Cell signaling 2729) and Salmon sperm DNA/protein A agarose (Millipore 16–157). After washing and elution, DNA was recovered and purified by phenol/chloroform extraction and used for qPCR. The primers used for qPCR can be found in S6 Table.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!