The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

12 protocols using cd127 pe

1

Lymphocyte Subsets Evaluation by Flow Cytometry

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Lymphocyte subsets were evaluated within 3 h of blood collection. For Treg detection as CD3+CD4+CD25+CD127−/low+ cells and CD4+ T cell detection, 50 μL of whole blood was stained with a premixed cocktail of conjugated mAbs (Beckman Coulter) for the following markers, CD3-FITC (clone UCHT1), CD25-PC5 (clone B1.49.9), CD4-PC7 (clone 13B8.2), and CD127-PE (clone R34.34) in concentrations according to manufacturer instructions. The gating strategy for CD3+CD4+CD25+CD127−/low+ cells including details on gating set-up and the analytical and statistical comparability of CD25+CD127−/low+ and CD25+FoxP3+ quantification approaches are shown in Additional file 1: Figure S1. CD8+ cells were detected using 50 μL of whole blood stained with tetraCHROME CD45-FITC/CD4-PE/CD8-ECD/CD3-PC5 multi-color reagent (Beckman Coulter) in concentrations according to the manufacturer instructions. After a 15 min staining for Tregs or CD8+ T-cells in the dark, red blood cells were lysed for 15 min in the dark by adding 600 μL of VersaLyse Lysing Solution (Beckman Coulter, France). Cells were subsequently analyzed using a Cytomics FC 500 flow cytometer, hardware compensation and CXP software (Beckman Coulter, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

T Cell Subset Analysis in PBMCs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
T cell analyses were performed in purified peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). A primary stain with unlabelled murine anti-human antibodies directed against PD-1 (clone EH12.2H7) or isotype control followed with secondary phycoerythrin (PE)-labelled goat-anti-mouse immunoglobulin antibody (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark) was followed by primary labelled surface stains as follows: CD4 (Pacific Blue); CD5 (allophycocyanin (APC)-AlexaFluor 700); CD25 (fluorescein isothiocyanate, FITC); CD45RA (energy-coupled dye, ECD or FITC); CD62L (PE or phycoerythrin-cyanin 5, PC5); CD127 (PE) (all from Beckman Coulter, CA, USA); CD8 (Pacific Orange) (Invitrogen, MD, USA); CD183 (APC) and CD194 (phycoerythrin-cyanin 7, PC7) (all from BD Biosciences, CA, USA). Analyses were done on a Gallios flow cytometer and T cell subsets were defined as follows: naïve (CD62L+CD45RA+), central memory (CM, CD62L−CD45RA+), effector memory (EM, CD62L−CD45RA−), TEMRA (CD62L+CD45RA−), TH1 (CD183+CD194−), TH2 (CD183−CD194+) and Treg (CD25+CD127−). Statistical analyses were performed using unpaired t tests for all subgroup results. A simple Bonferroni correction was applied to adjust for multiple testing, leading to a necessary p value of < 0.0025 for the definition of significance.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Flow Cytometric Quantification of CD4+ T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The CD4 T lymphocytes were assessed in peripheral blood by the method of flow cytometry. Ten μL of monoclonal antibodies CD4-PC5, CD25-FITC, and CD127-PE (Beckman Coulter) were added to each sample with 100 μL of whole blood. After 30 min of incubation at room temperature, each sample was subjected to a rapid, automatic lysis process (ImmunoPrep Work Station, Beckman Coulter). After thorough mixing, the samples were analyzed by the method of flow cytometry (Cytomics FC500, Beckman Coulter) and every 105 cells were counted. The control was determined according to the FMO (fluorescence-minus-one) method.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Quantification of human regulatory T cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The cells were washed twice with PBS and stained for 30 min at room temperature in the dark with fluorescent-labeled anti-human monoclonal antibodies mixture: CD4-fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC), CD25-PC5, and CD127-PE (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, United States). Quantification beads (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, United States) were used to assess absolute counts of cell subsets. Background fluorescence and nonspecific staining were assessed using appropriate isotype- and fluorochrome-matched control monoclonal antibodies. The frequencies and absolute counts of CD4+CD25highCD127-/low Tregs and the percentage of Tregs on gated CD4+ lymphocytes were assessed by a Cytomics FC 500 flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA, United States).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Expansion of Regulatory T Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The ability of expanded Tregs to generate new Tregs infectiously from naïve responder cells was measured using the “Treg-MLR” as described previously24 (link). Briefly, MLR cultures were set up with “recipient” CFSE-labelled responders stimulated with irradiated (3,000 rads) and PKH26-labelled donor-specific or allo-irrelevant PBMC. PKH26-labelled modulator cells composed of either Tregs or R-PBMC treated in an equivalent manner to serve as controls were then added at modulator: responder ratios of 1:10, 1:50, and 1:250. On day 7, flow cytometry was performed on the cultured cells after labelling with CD127-PE, CD4-ECD, CD25-PC7 (all from Beckman-Coulter), and FOXP3-PC5 (eBioscience). PKH26-labelled modulators and any surviving stimulators as well as CD127-PE+ responder cells were gated out, and CD4+ cells that proliferated (as determined by reduced CFSE expression) were analyzed for CD25 and FOXP3 expressions. Thus, the percentage of CD4+CD127CD25HighFOXP3+ cells that were newly generated in the proliferating responder cells was determined.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Phenotypic Analysis of CD8+ T-Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The phenotypes of CD8+ T-cells in whole blood (using Optylyse, Beckman Coulter, Marseille, France) or isolated cells were distinguished by flow cytometry using multiple antibodies: CD127-PE (5μl, clone R34.34, AB_131301, Beckman Coulter), CD8-FITC/PeCy5 (5μl, clone HIT8a, AB_395996 and AB_395998), CD45RA-APC/PECy5 (3μl, clone HI100, AB_398468 and AB_395881, BD Pharmingen, BD Bioscience, San Jose, CA, USA) and CCR7-APCCy7 (5μl, clone G043H7, AB_10916390, Biolegend, San Diego, CA, USA). Freshly isolated cells (1x105 lymphocytes per sample) were incubated in 1% BSA-PBS (100μl) for 30 minutes on ice, followed by 2 washes with 1% BSA-PBS, protocol adapted from Nascimbeni and Rehermann [37 (link)]. Cell subsets were distinguished as follows: naïve (TN, CD45RA+CCR7+), central memory (TCM, CD45RA-CCR7+), effector memory (TEM, CD45RA-CCR7-), and terminally differentiated effector memory (TEMRA, CD45RA+CCR7-). When analyzing IH-CD8+ T-cells, the flow cytometer was calibrated using blood CD8+ T-cells to conserve the number of IH-CD8+ T-cells available for study, which revealed a higher degree of autofluorescence in IH-CD8+ T-cells compared to blood-derived cells, as previously reported by others [38 (link)]. All flow cytometry analyses excluded dead cells, on the basis of forward and side scatter profiles, and gates were set using the principle of fluorescence minus one (FMO).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Multi-panel Flow Cytometry for Treg Expansion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For research expansion samples on days 0, 14 and 21 as well as post-transplant immune monitoring, antibodies against CD4-FITC, CD127-PE, CD3-ECD, CD25-PC7 (all Beckman-Coulter) and FOXP3-PC5 (eBioscience, San Diego, CA) were used. Chemokine and receptor characterizations were performed using CXCR3/GARP-Pacific Blue, CXCR4/CD62L-PerCP-Cy5.5, CCR7/CD45RO-APC-Cy7, CD45RA-Alexa700, and CTLA-4-APC (all from eBioscience, San Diego, CA).
For the GMP expanded Treg products 1–9, three separate panels were used consistently throughout Treg expansion and all antibodies were purchased from Miltenyi. Panel one: CD8-APC, CD20-FITC, CD14/15/56-PE, CD45-Pacific Blue and 7AAD-PerCP-Cy5.5. Panel two: CD25-APC, CD4-FITC, CD127-PE, CD45-Pacific Blue and 7AAD-PerCP-Cy5.5. Panel three: CD4-FITC, CD25-PE, Foxp3-APC and CD45-Pacific Blue. Research grade flow cytometry was performed on a Beckman-Coulter FC500 whereas clinical flow cytometry was done on a BD-LSR, as previously described37 (link),54 ,55 (link).
Patient post-transplant flow cytometric analyses were done on a Beckman-Coulter FC500 using antibodies (all Beckman-Coulter) against CD4-FITC, CD127-PE, CD3-ECD, CD25-PC7 and FOXP3-PC5 (eBioscience); IL10-FITC, IgD/M-PE, CD19-ECD, CD27-PC5, CD24-PC7; Helios-FITC, CD3-ECD, CD28-PC5, CD8-PC7 and FOXP3-PE (eBioscience), among others.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Quantifying Proliferation and Tregs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
As previously described [1 (link), 8 (link), 9 (link)], after Ficoll-Hypaque gradient centrifugation, PBMC were labeled with CFSE following the manufacturer’s instructions (labeling efficiency of >99%). 5x105 CFSE labeled responding PBMC from healthy volunteer (A) were cultured with 5x105 PKH26 labeled stimulator cells from HLA-2DR-matched (Bx) or HLA-mismatched (Ix; indifferent 3rd party) laboratory volunteers in 48-well culture plates. On days 0 (baseline), 5, 7 and 9 flow cytometric analyses were performed for surface markers using CD4-ECD, CD25-PC7, CD127-PE (all from Beckman-Coulter, Miami, FL) and for intracellular FOXP3-PC5 (eBioscience, San Diego, CA) as previously described [7 (link), 8 (link)]. Gated viable lymphocytes were further gated followed for CFSE bright and dim cells which were negative for both CD127-PE and PKH26 (thus gating out CD127+ responders and any residual stimulators). This was followed by gating for CD4+ cells. CFSE dilution in these CD4+ responders assessed the extent of proliferation, i.e., non-proliferating (CFSE high) or proliferating (CFSE low) cells. The expression of CD25 and FOXP3 were analyzed in the non-proliferating and proliferating populations. Data were calculated as percentage of CD127-CD4+ cells that were CD25+FOXP3+ (total Tregs) or CD25HighFOXP3+ (natural Tregs; nTregs) [10 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Phenotypic Analysis of B Cells and Tregs in Donor Expansion

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For “donor” B cell expansion experiments, flow cytometry was performed on cultured PBMC on indicated days using antibodies against CD19-PC7, CD80-PE, CD86-PC5, HLA-DR-ECD (all from Beckman-Coulter, Miami, FL). To phenotype Tregs, antibodies against CD4-FITC, CD127-PE, CD3-ECD, CD25-PC7 (all from Beckman-Coulter) and FOXP3-PC5 (eBioscience, San Diego, CA) were used on days 0, 14 and 21, (also on day 28 in longer-term cultures). All detection was performed on a Beckman-Coulter FC500 flow cytometer as previously described9 ,24 (link),25 (link). The gating strategy used for the analyses including that for the negative controls is shown in Supplemental Fig. 1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantification of Th17 and Treg Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Absolute count of Th17 and Treg cells was performed by flow cytometry. PBMCs were adjusted to the concentrations of more than 1 × 106 cells/L and incubated with various antibodies. Anti-human CD antibodies: CD45-ECD, CD4-FITC, CD3-PC5, CD25-APC, and CD127-PE (Beckman Coulter, USA) were used for Treg detection. Gates were set as high side scatter (SS) and CD45+ cells, followed by CD3+CD4+ cells, CD25+CD127− cells; anti-human CD antibodies: CD45-ECD, CD4-FITC, CD3-PC5 (Beckman Coulter, USA), and IL-17-PE (eBioscience, USA) were used for Th17 detection. Gates were set as high SS and CD45+ cells, followed by CD3+CD4+ cells and CD4+IL-17+ cells. Cells were treated with PerNix-nc kit (Beckman Coulter, USA) before being subjected to Th17 analysis by flow cytometry. All samples were analyzed by Flow Cytometer Navios (Beckman Coulter, USA). The results are expressed as the percentage of Th17 or Treg in PBMCs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!