The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Tablecurve 2d

Manufactured by Grafiti LLC
Sourced in United States, United Kingdom

TableCurve 2D is a curve fitting and equation discovery software developed by Systat Software Inc. It is designed to automatically fit a wide range of curve types to 2D data sets, and to discover the underlying mathematical equation that best describes the data.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

27 protocols using tablecurve 2d

1

Comparative Analysis of Experimental and Simulation Load-Displacement Curves

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Steps were taken to better compare and calculate the error of the results between the actual experiment and the finite element simulation. First, the load-displacement curve data of BCLT samples was fitted by TableCurve 2D (TableCurve 2D, Systat Software Inc, v5.01, San Jose, CA, USA), and the fitting functions were obtained as shown in Fig. 8. The correlation of the fitting function Y1 (Eq. 3) of the actual experiment was 99.95%, and the correlation of the fitting function y1 (Eq. 4) of the finite element simulation was 99.99%. Second, the load-displacement curves of BWCLT boards were fitted, and the fitting functions were obtained. The correlation of fitting function Y2 (Eq. 5) was 99.84%, and the correlation of fitting function y2 (Eq. 4) was 99.99%. Equation y2 and y1 are the same, but their coefficients are different.
y1(y2) = a + b๐‘ฅ 0.5 + ๐‘๐‘ฅ + ๐‘‘๐‘ฅ 1.5 + ๐‘’๐‘ฅ 2 + ๐‘“๐‘ฅ 2.5 + ๐‘”๐‘ฅ 3 + โ„Ž๐‘ฅ 3.5 + ๐‘–๐‘ฅ 4 + ๐‘—๐‘ฅ 4.5 + ๐‘˜๐‘ฅ 5 (4) Y2 = A + B๐‘ฅ + ๐ถ๐‘ฅ 2 + ๐ท๐‘ฅ 3 + ๐ธ๐‘ฅ 4 + ๐น๐‘ฅ 5 + ๐บ๐‘ฅ 6 + ๐ป๐‘ฅ 7 + ๐ผ๐‘ฅ 8 + ๐ฝ๐‘ฅ 9
(5)
In Eqs. 3, 4, and 5, all the coefficients in the equation are numerical values.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Ion Hydration and Binding Parameters

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The parameters for hydration, ๐œˆ๐œˆ 12 , and ion binding, ๐œˆ๐œˆ 32 are determined by nonlinear regression of Eq. 6 (TableCurve 2D, Systat Software, San Jose, CA) to best fit the osmotic pressure versus concentration profiles for each anion solution in the study. The ion hydration parameter, ๐œˆ๐œˆ 13 , was estimated from the literature (Table 2). Table 2 also includes the reported crystal radius, apparent dynamic hydration number (ADHN) and kosmotrophicity for each ion. The crystal radius is inversely related to surface charge density. 16 The ADHN for each ion is considered to be a primary factor in ion binding to proteins. 71 Kosmotrophicity is a categorization of whether an ion behaves as a kosmotrope (k) or a chaotrope (c). This evaluation is based on a number of factors including the viscosity B coefficients 34
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Seasonal Beetle Mortality and Fungal Infection

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Beetles in the lower plate were scored as alive or dead when assessed every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. Dead beetles were immediately placed in the upper Petri plate and scored as dead-asymptomatic, mycelial outgrowth, or sporulating during subsequent evaluations. On each evaluation day, the cigarette lter in the lower plate and lter paper in the upper plate were moistened as required, and apple replaced if it was moldy or deteriorating. On day 31, beetles maintained at April temperatures were removed and placed in a 25C incubator to verify the contribution of degree days to mortality and disease development.
All beetles were assessed until day 35. Mean beetle mortality outcomes (y) with standard deviation were plotted against evaluation day (x) for each seasonal temperature x beetle species x M. brunneum strain. Zero-intercept transition function (sigmoid) models were t to the data using TableCurve 2D (Systat Software, San Jose, CA, USA). The percent of subdivided dead categories were plotted against evaluation day.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Curve Fitting Software Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All statistical analyses (regressions, model fitting) in this study were performed using the software Table Curve 2D, version 5.01 (Systat Software, 2000 ).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Comparing Treatment Effects with Statistical Analyses

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Statistical analyses were applied on datasets recorded for all individuals within one treatment (n = 60). To compare the treatments with each other, likelihood ratio tests and, if necessary, Fishers exact test were conducted (ฮฑ = 0.05) with SAS JMP version 12 (SAS Institute, Germany). To correct for multiple testing, the ฮฑ-level was adjusted by sequentially Bonferroni correction [23 ]. Table Curve 2D (Systat Software GmbH, Germany) was used for calculating regression curves and SigmaPlot 13 (Systat Software GmbH, Germany) was used to plot graphs.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Curve Fitting for Polyprotic Drugs

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Table Curve 2D from Systat Software Inc. (San Jose, CA, USA) was used to fit the mobility -pH curves of polyprotic drugs. Other data calculations were performed through Excel 2010 from Microsoft (Redmond, WA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Drying Kinetics and Modeling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Results are presented as mean ยฑ standard deviation of two independent technological determinations. Statistical analysis was conducted using Statistica version 13.3 (StatSoft, Krakรณw, Poland) and for PCA analysis XLSTAT for Microsoft Excel2019 was used. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a significance differences below 0.001 was evaluated by Tukey test. Drying model was fitted using Table Curve 2D (Systat Software, Inc., San Jose, CA, USA). The good fitting of a model was evaluated using coefficient of determination (R2) and root mean square error (RMSE).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Optimizing Frying Conditions for Food Quality

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The experiments were replicated at least 5 times. Mean and standard deviation of the data were calculated. The Fisherโ€™s least significant difference (LSD) tests were applied for analysis of the effects of PEF treatment, level of dehydration and frying temperature. For each analysis, the significance level of 5% was assumed. All statistical analyses were performed with a 95% confidence interval. For the derivation of frying rates constant, the software package TableCurve 2D, version 5.01 (Systat Software, San Jose, CA, United States) was used.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Quantitative Antimicrobial Efficacy Evaluation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For ELLA experiments (data from 12 independent samples), OD at 405 nm was plotted versus the logarithm of Con A concentrations. Values were fitted in a dose-response curve including 95% confidence intervals using Table Curve 2D (Systat Software Inc., San Jose, CA).
All results of PIB experiments are graphically shown as medians, including 25 and 75% quantiles and were calculated using SPSS for Windows, version 20 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) from the values of at least six independent experiments, each performed in duplicate. Horizontal solid and dashed lines in the figures depict reductions of 3 and 5 log10 steps CFU respectively, compared to untreated control groups PS-L-. Medians on these lines exhibit inactivation efficacy rates of 99.9% (3 log10) or 99.999% (5 log10). According to the infection control guidelines, this is declared as biologically relevant antimicrobial activity or disinfectant effect, respectively (Boyce and Pittet, 2002 (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantitative Analysis of Calcium Release

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Results from pH measurements and colorimetric Ca2+ release assays are shown as medians, 1st and 3rd quartiles and were calculated using SPSS, v. 25 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) from the values of at least 10 (planktonic) or 12 (biofilm) independent duplicate experiments, respectively. For calculating Ca2+ concentrations from OD values, a standard was prepared according to the manufacturerโ€™s guidelines (Calcium assay kit ab102505). OD values were fitted on a linear curve (r2โ€‰=โ€‰0.96) using Table Curve 2D (Systat Software Inc., San Jose, CA, USA). Data were analyzed statistically by applying non-parametric procedures (Mann-Whitney U test) for pairwise comparisons between groups on an ฮฑโ€‰=โ€‰0.05 level of significance using SPSS. CFU results were calculated as medians, 1st and 3rd quartiles with SPSS from the values of at least 6 independent experiments, each performed in duplicate.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!