The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Bullet blender storm

Manufactured by Next Advance
Sourced in United States

The Bullet Blender Storm is a high-performance lab equipment designed for efficient homogenization and sample preparation. It utilizes a powerful motor and a stainless-steel blade assembly to thoroughly blend and disrupt a variety of samples, including tissues, cells, and other materials. The Bullet Blender Storm is a versatile tool suitable for use in various laboratory applications.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

39 protocols using bullet blender storm

1

Necropsy Tissue Collection and DNA Extraction

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Animals were necropsied within 24 hours of death. Animals that were not necropsied immediately were refrigerated at 4°C until necropsy. A minimum of 13 tissues were collected: brain, submandibular lymph node, salivary gland, heart, lung, skin (including lesions, if present), stomach, intestine (several pieces including duodenum, jejunum and ileum), liver, spleen, kidney, and either testis or ovary. Immediately after necropsy, tissues were frozen at -80°C for later processing. Tissue pieces (40–100 mg) were homogenized using the Bullet Blender Storm bead homogenizer (Next Advance, Averill Park, NY, USA) according to tissue-specific protocols [32 ]. PBS with 1% FBS was added to tissue slurries to make a 10% solution by weight. DNA was extracted from 200 μl of tissue slurry, whole blood or swab liquid, using the QiaAMP DNA mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). For a small number of tissue samples, PCR inhibitors remained in the DNA sample after extraction. The DNA extractions were repeated with Zymo tissue g-DNA kit (Zymo Research, Irvine, CA). DNA was extracted from urine using standard phenol-chloroform extraction followed by ethanol precipitation [33 (link)].
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Preparation of Protein Lysates with RIPA Buffer

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Protein lysates were prepared as described previously [13 (link)] with the following modifications. homogenized in 500 µl RIPA complete lysis buffer (RIPA buffer (ThermoFisher, 89901) with 1× cOmplete EDTA-free protease inhibitor cocktail (Sigma, 11873580001), 1 mM benzamidine hydrochloride (VWR, TCB0013-100G), 4 µM pepstatin A (Sigma, EI10), 100 µM PMSF (Sigma, 11359061001)) and bead homogenized using stainless steel beads (NextAdvance, SSB14B-RNA) for 5 min at setting 10, Bullet Blender Storm (NextAdvance, BT24M). Samples were then centrifuged at 14 000g for 15 min at 4°C. Supernatants were transferred to protein loBind (Eppendorf) tubes. Protein lysate concentrations were determined using Pierce BCA (Thermo cat. 23227) microplate assay per manufacturer's instructions. Lysates were then stored at −80°C.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Quantitative Real-Time PCR for Gene Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
TAs were prepared and mechanistically homogenized using Bullet Blender Storm (Next Advance, NY), and total RNA was extracted from homogenized TA or cultured cells with RNAiso (Takara, Kusatsu, Japan) following the manufacturer’s instructions. One microgram of RNA was converted to cDNA using oligo dT primers (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) and Reverse Transcriptase XL (AMV) (Takara, Kusatsu, Japan). Gene expression was assessed using quantitative real-time PCR with Thermal Cycler Dice Real Time System TP800 (Takara, Kusatsu, Japan) and SYBR Premix Ex Taq (Takara, Kusatsu, Japan). Primers used in this study are listed in Supplementary Table S1A.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Mosquito Body Homogenization and Viral Infection Assay

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Frozen mosquito body samples were homogenized in a Bullet Blender Storm (Next Advance), according to a previously reported protocol (Fros et al., 2015b (link)). In total, 30 μl of the body tissue homogenate or mosquito saliva was added to one well of a 96-well plate containing Vero cells at 80% confluency. After incubation for 2 h at 37°C, the cell medium was replaced with fresh DMEM HEPES complete medium, and the cells were kept at 37°C for another 6 days. Positive viral infection was determined by checking for CPE at both 3 dpi and 6 dpi for each well. The infection rate and transmission efficiency were expressed as the percentage of virus-positive mosquito bodies or saliva over the total number of mosquitoes used for the salivation assay. Viral titers were determined by EPDAs using six and four bodies and saliva samples of the USUV-NL and USUV-IT infected mosquitoes, respectively.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Quantifying Trypanosoma cruzi DNA in Tissues

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Organs and tissues were snap frozen on dry ice and stored at −80°C. For DNA extraction, samples were thawed and immediately homogenized in at least 200 μl lysis buffer (4 M urea, 200 mM Tris, 20 mM NaCl, 200 mM EDTA, pH 7.4) per 50 mg tissue using a BulletBlender Storm instrument (Next Advance). The tissue suspension was then incubated overnight at 37°C with 0.6 mg proteinase K. DNA was extracted using the High Pure PCR product purification kit (Roche). Real-time PCR reactions were prepared using the QuantiTect SYBR Green PCR Kit (Qiagen) and run on a RotorGene 3000 instrument. Each reaction contained 50 ng DNA and 0.5 μM of each primer. T. cruzi-specific primers TCZ-F and TCZ-R (Cummings and Tarleton, 2003 (link)), targeted at the 195 bp satellite repeat, and mouse-specific primers GAPDHf and GAPDHr (Cencig et al., 2011 (link)), targeted at the murine gapdh gene, were used. Measurements of T. cruzi DNA content were normalized using the ratio of Ct values for T. cruzi- and mouse-specific PCRs, and converted to estimated numbers of parasite equivalents by reference to a standard curve with a range of 2.5 × 106–2.5 × 10−1 parasite equivalents ml−1. The standard curve was established from serial dilution of a DNA sample derived from 75 mg homogenized muscle tissue, spiked with 2 × 107 epimastigotes, using DNA from unspiked equivalent samples as the diluent.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Optimized Extraction of Blubber Proteins

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The SDC method of protein extraction was adapted from a previously published protocol (Pasing et al., 2017 (link)). Blubber was processed in two batches of ∼50 mg, which were minced with a sterile scalpel on ice and added to 500 µl SDC Lysis Buffer [1% w/v SDC, 8 M urea, 5 mM dithiothreitol (DTT) in 50 mM ammonium bicarbonate] in a Navy RINO® bead tube (Next Advance Inc., USA). Samples were homogenized in the Bullet Blender Storm® instrument (Next Advance Inc., USA) for two cycles of 2 min each at power 10, with 1 min of cooling on ice between cycles. Homogenates were further disrupted by sonication for three cycles, 15 s each, at 4 watts using a hand-held sonicator (VirSonic 60, Virtis, USA) and centrifuged to pellet insoluble cell debris and separate lipids. Tissue homogenates were extracted from under the top lipid layer and transferred to clean tubes. To remove any remaining lipids, four volumes of methanol and one volume of chloroform were added to homogenate aliquots, mixed, and centrifuged. The top layer containing lipids was removed, and four volumes of methanol were added to precipitate proteins. Protein pellets were air dried after centrifugation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

RNA Extraction from Parietal Bone

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
After dissection, parietal bones were homogenized in RNAse free tubes with beads (Navye1-RNA) with TRIzol using the Bullet Blender Storm homogenizer (Next Advance). After chloroform step total RNA isolation was performed according to protocol provided by manufacturer (RNAeasy kit). After DNAse treatment, RNA was synthesized into cDNA as previously described.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Infection Kinetics in BALB/c Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All animal experiments were performed in compliance with guidelines set out by the Canadian Council on Animal Care. All animal protocols (protocol 2017-028) were reviewed and approved by the University of Western Ontario Animal Use Subcommittee, a subcommittee of the University Council on Animal Care. Six- to 8-week-old female BALB/c mice (Charles River Laboratories) were injected via tail vein with 100 μl of bacterial culture containing 1 × 107 CFU of bacteria. To prepare the bacteria, strains were grown to an OD600 2 to 2.5 in TSB, washed twice with PBS, and resuspended to the desired numbers in PBS. Infections were allowed to proceed for up to 96 h before animals were euthanized or when they met guidelines for early euthanasia. Organs were harvested in PBS plus 0.1% (vol/vol) Triton X-100 and homogenized in a Bullet Blender Storm (Next Advance, Troy, NY), using 2 runs of 5 min at setting 10 and metal beads. Dilutions of organ homogenates were plated on tryptic soy agar (TSA) for CFU enumeration.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Stool DNA Extraction and 16S rRNA Sequencing

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Participants were provided with a Fe-Col® (Alpha laboratories, Hampshire, United Kingdom) fecal sample collection kit to collect stool samples. Stool samples were collected once and were transported on ice to the laboratory where they were stored at −80°C until analysis. DNA was extracted using the commercial EZNA Stool DNA Kit (Omega Biotek, Madrid, Spain), following the manufacturer’s instructions, with a bead-beating homogenizer (Bullet BlenderStorm, Next Advance, New York, NY, United States) using glass beads for 3 min at speed 10 (following the manufacturer’s recommendations). The elution volume was 100 μL. The DNA concentration and purity of was measured using the Quant-iT PicoGreen dsDNA Assay Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States). Microbiota analyses were performed by amplifying the V3-V4 hypervariable regions of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene. The 459 base pair (bp) amplicon was visualized in a 0.8% agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide. The bands were cut and cleaned using the MinElute Gel extraction kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). DNA amplicons were sequenced on a MiSeq Illumina platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, United States). Raw data in fastq format have been deposited and are publicly available with the accession number PRJNA564612 the NCBI Biosample database1.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Quantifying Virus Titers in Infected Mice

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
To verify presence or absence of virus and quantify tissue titers in infected mice, tissues collected at the time of death or euthanasia were evaluated by real-time PCR and cell culture isolation assays. Tissue samples were homogenized using a Bullet Blender Storm bead homogenizer (Next Advance, Averill Park, NY) according to tissue-specific protocols (Next Advance, 2012 ). Total DNA was extracted from aliquots of 100 μl of tissue slurry using Quick-gDNA kit (ZYMO RESEARCH, Irvine, CA). Homogenized tissues were tested for the presence of viral DNA using real-time PCR to amplify the E9L gene of orthopoxviruses as described elsewhere (Li et al., 2010 (link)) with minor modifications. The remaining aliquots (100 μl) of the tissue slurry were evaluated for virus isolation and titration as described above.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!