The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

3 protocols using epr5701

1

Protein Expression Analysis in Stem Cells

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Western blots were performed as previously described [23 (link)] using specific antibodies against TP63 (EPR5701, Abcam), SOX2 (D6D9), SOX4 (Millpore), NOTCH1 (D1E11), NOTCH3 (D11B8), NANOG (D73G4), OCT4, KLF4 (D1F2), CD44 (EPR1013Y, Abcam), and ABCG2; GAPDH (1:2000, 14C10) and α-Tubulin (1:2000, 11H10) were used as internal references. All antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology, except where indicated, and used at 1:1000 dilutions. The full scans of the Western blots were quantified using the Alpha Innotech imaging software (San Leandro, CA, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multiplex Fluorescent Immunohistochemistry for Lung Cancer Validation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Collected fresh lung tissue resections were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde, followed by dehydration and embedding in paraffin as routine protocol. Subsequently, the paraffin blocks were cut into 3-μm-thick sections and adhered to the slices for Multiplex fluorescent IHC staining. Briefly, the sections were firstly placed in a 65 °C oven for 1 h and deparaffinized in xylene, followed by rehydrated successively in 95%, 80%, and 70% alcohol. Then, antigen retrieval was performed by incubating in critic acid buffer at 95 °C for 20 min. Endogenous peroxidase was blocked by incubating in 3% H2O2 at room temperature (RT) for 10 min. Subsequently, 10% normal goat serum was added at RT for 1 h to block non-specific sites. Then, the sections were incubated with freshly diluted primary antibodies at RT for 1h. The primary antibodies that were used for cancer type validation included anti-p63 (Abcam, clone EPR5701, diluted at 1:12000), anti-TTF1 (Abcam, clone EP1584Y, diluted at 1:250), and anti-PGP9.5 (UCHL1) (Abcam, clone EPR4118, diluted at 1:250). Next, the second antibody was added to the sections and incubated at RT for another 1 h. Finally, the sections were incubated in freshly prepared fluorochrome at RT for 10 min. The antigen binding sites were visualized and analyzed with the PerkinElmer Vectra Automated Multispectral Imaging System.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Immunohistochemical Analysis of Tumor Markers

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Paraffin-embedded tumor tissues were cut into 4μm sections and processed for immunostaining. The sections were incubated overnight at 4°C with primary antibodies against TP63 (1:2000, EPR5701, Abcam), ΔNp63 (1:1000, N-16, Santa Cruz), Ki67 (1:1000, SP6, Abcam), SOX2 (1:200, D6D9, Cell Signaling Technology), CD44 (1:200, EPR1013Y, Abcam), KLF4 (1:200, D1F2, Cell Signaling Technology), and pan Cytokeratin (1:50, Novusbio), visualized using 3, 3-diaminobenzidine (DAB, Sigma-Aldrich) and counterstained with hematoxylin. Two senior pathologists who were blinded to the clinical data assessed and scored the IHC results. The fields were randomly selected for each sample under a light microscope with a 400× magnification. The staining index (SI) for TP63 (ΔNp63) was scored according to the staining intensity (0, no staining; 1, weak, light yellow; 2, moderate, yellow brown; 3, strong, brown) and the proportion of positive cells (0, 0%; 1, <10%; 2, <50%; 3, <75%; 4, ≥75%) per the following formula: SI= the proportion of positively stained cells×the staining intensity [57 (link)]. Cases with SI (TP63) >6 were classified into the high-expression group, and those with SI ≤6 were classified into the low-expression group. This scoring method was also used to evaluate the Ki67, SOX2, KLF4, and CD44 proteins expression in tumor xenografts.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!