The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Signa 3 tesla scanner

Manufactured by GE Healthcare
Sourced in United States

The Signa 3 Tesla scanner is a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) system manufactured by GE Healthcare. It operates at a field strength of 3 Tesla, providing high-resolution imaging capabilities for various clinical applications. The Signa 3 Tesla scanner is designed to acquire detailed images of the body's internal structures, enabling healthcare professionals to diagnose and monitor a wide range of medical conditions.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

8 protocols using signa 3 tesla scanner

1

Whole Brain Structural and Functional MRI

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All participants were scanned on a General Electric 3-Tesla Signa scanner located in the Clinical Research Center at the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. Whole brain volumes were acquired using an 8-channel head coil (30 slices, 64 × 64 matrix, FoV = 200 × 200 mm, in-plane resolution 3.125 × 3.125 mm, slice thickness 4 mm, 0.4 mm inter-slice gap, TR = 2 s, TE = 30 msec). For each participant, a high-resolution anatomical scan was also acquired. All functional localizer and event-related runs were interleaved.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Multimodal Brain Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data was collected at the Center for Cognitive and Neurobiological Imaging at Stanford University, using a GE 3 tesla SIGNA Scanner with a 32-channel head coil. 48 slices were acquired, covering the occipitotemporal and most of the frontal cortex using a T2*-sensitive gradient echo sequence (resolution: 2.4 mm × 2.4 mm × 2.4 mm, TR: 1000 ms, TE: 30 ms, FoV: 192 mm, flip angle: 62°, multiplexing factor of 3). A whole-brain, anatomical volume was acquired as well, once for each participant, using a T1-weighted BRAVO pulse sequence (resolution: 1mm × 1 mm × 1 mm, TI=450 ms, flip angle: 12°, 1 NEX, FoV: 240 mm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Neuroimaging Acquisition Protocol for Cognitive Studies

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Data was collected at the Center for Cognitive and
Neurobiological Imaging at Stanford University, using a GE 3 tesla Signa
Scanner with a 32-channel head coil. We acquired 48 slices covering the
occipitotemporal and most of the frontal cortex using a
T2*-sensitive gradient echo sequence (resolution: 2.4 mm
× 2.4 mm × 2.4 mm, TR: 1000 ms, TE: 30 ms, FoV: 192 mm,
flip angle: 62°, multiplexing factor of 3). A whole-brain,
anatomical volume was also acquired, once for each participant, using a
T1-weighted BRAVO pulse sequence (resolution: 1mm × 1 mm
× 1 mm, TI=450 ms, flip angle: 12°, 1 NEX, FoV:
240 mm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Functional MRI Acquisition Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Images were acquired on a GE Signa 3 Tesla scanner equipped with a standard quadrature head coil. Functional T2* weighted images were acquired using a spiral sequence with 25 contiguous slices with 3.75×3.75×5 mm voxels (repetition time (TR) = 1500 ms; echo time (TE) = 30 ms; flip angle = 70°; field of view (FOV) = 24 cm). A T1-weighted gradient echo anatomical overlay was acquired using the same FOV and slices (TR = 225 ms, TE = 5.7 ms, flip angle = 90°). Additionally, a 124-slice high-resolution T1-weighted anatomical image was collected using spoiled-gradient-recalled acquisition (SPGR) in steady-state imaging (TR = 9 ms, TE = 1.8 ms, flip angle = 15°, FOV = 25–26 cm, slice thickness = 1.2 mm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Multimodal Neuroimaging of Resting-State Brain

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Images were acquired on a GE SIGNA 3 Tesla scanner, equipped with a standard quadrature head coil. Functional T2* weighted images were acquired using a spiral sequence with 25 contiguous slices with 3.75 × 3.75 × 5 mm voxels with repetition time (TR) = 1500 ms; echo time (TE) = 30 ms; flip angle =70°; field of view (FOV) = 24 cm for 360 s of rest (eyes open). A T1-weighted gradient echo anatomical overlay was acquired using the same FOV and slices (TR = 225 ms, TE = 5.7 ms, flip angle = 90°). Additionally, a 124-slice high-resolution T1- weighted anatomical image was collected using spoiled gradient-recalled acquisition in steady-state imaging (TR = 5 ms, TE = 1.8 ms, flip angle = 15, FOV = 25–26 cm, slice thickness = 1.2 mm).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Slow Event-related Paradigm for Speech and Auditory Perception

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Using Presentation, we implemented a slow event-related paradigm (©Neurobehavioral Systems, Inc.,3) comprising two perceptual tasks defined as tone perception and vowel listening, a vowel articulation imagery task and a vowel production task. In perceptual trials, stimulus presentation lasted for 2 s and was followed by 8 s rest. Imagery/production trials started with 2 s stimulus presentation, then followed by 8 s maintenance phase, 2 s task execution (articulation imagery, or production of the same heard vowel) and finally 8 s rest. Globally, functional scans lasted 47 m, divided into 10 runs. All vowels and tones were presented twice to each subject, and their presentation order was randomized within and across tasks and subjects.
Functional imaging was carried out through GRE-EPI sequences on a GE Signa 3 Tesla scanner equipped with an 8-channel head coil (TR/TE = 2500/30 ms; FA = 75°; 2 mm isovoxel; geometry: 128 × 128 × 37 axial slices). Structural imaging was provided by T1-weighted FSPGR sequences (TR/TE = 8.16/3.18 ms; FA = 12°; 1mm isovoxel; geometry: 256x256x170 axial slices). MR-compatible on-ear headphones (30 dB noise-attenuation, 40 Hz to 40 kHz frequency response) were used to achieve auditory stimulation.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Longitudinal DTI Brain Imaging Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Imaging was conducted from August 2005 until August 2011 on three types
of MRI scanners: a Trio 3 Tesla scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions, Malvern, PA,
USA), a Signa 1.5 Tesla scanner (General Electric Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA),
and a Signa 3 Tesla scanner (General Electric Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA). DTI
data from two examinations were evaluated. Baseline imaging was conducted 3-12
months after surgery and follow-up imaging was acquired 2 years (+/- 3
months) after baseline. The baseline time point was selected to ensure the
resolution of any acute neurosurgical effects, such as edema, for all
participants, while preceding the onset of any delayed late-effects of radiation
therapy in the RT group. The DTI protocols for the participants in the study are
listed in Table 3.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Neuroimaging Protocol for Task-Based fMRI

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Imaging data were acquired on a General Electric Signa 3-Tesla scanner, and analyzed using the Statistical Parametric Mapping Software package (SPM8; University College London). An echo-planar single shot gradient echo T2*-weighted sequence was used to collect 23 axial slices of 5-mm thickness, parallel to the AC-PC-line (repetition time = 2,000 ms; echo time = 40 ms; field of view = 240 mm; 64 × 64 matrix, 3.75 × 3.75 mm voxels). The anatomical scan used a magnetization prepared gradient echo (MPRAGE) sequence to collect 180 1 mm sagittal slices (field of view = 256 mm; repetition time = 11.4 ms; echo time = 4.4 ms; matrix = 256 × 256; inversion time = 300 ms). Data were analyzed for subjects who successfully completed the task and stayed within 3.0 mm of motion in any plane.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!