The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Anti phospho s6 ser235 236

Manufactured by Cell Signaling Technology
Sourced in United States

Anti-phospho-S6 (Ser235/236) is a laboratory reagent used to detect the phosphorylation of the S6 ribosomal protein at serine residues 235 and 236. This antibody can be used in various applications, such as Western blotting, to study the activity and regulation of the S6 protein, which is involved in cellular processes like protein synthesis and cell growth.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

18 protocols using anti phospho s6 ser235 236

1

Immunoblot Analysis of Cellular Signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Immunoblot analysis was conducted as described previously [48 (link)]. Briefly, equal amounts of proteins were resolved on an SDS-polyacrylamide gradient gel and transferred by electroblotting onto a nitrocellulose membrane. Membranes were probed with the indicated primary antibodies. The specific signals were visualized with a chemiluminescence detection system using appropriate secondary antibodies (Perkin-Elmer, Waltham, MA, USA). The following antibodies were used for immunoblotting: anti-TOP2B (Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA), anti-HIF-1α, anti-ARNT/HIF-1β (BD Transduction, San Jose, CA, USA), anti-EPAS1/HIF-2α, anti-mTOR, anti-MUC1, anti-HK2, anti-PDK1, anti-4EBP1, anti-phospho-4EBP1 (Ser65), anti-S6, anti-phospho-S6 (Ser235/236), anti-S6K, anti-phospho-S6K (Thr389) and anti-RPS3 (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA, USA). TOP2B, mTOR and RPS3 were used as controls.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Quantitative Immunohistochemical Analysis of Phospho-S6 Expression

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Sections were stained with anti-phospho S6 (Ser235/236; antibody #4858 from Cell Signaling Technology). For quantitation of the slides, five to six representative areas per slide were analyzed using Aperio eSlide Manager software in a blinded manner by a board-certified pathologist (H.K.). To generate the patient survival curve, grading scores of pre-treatment samples were based on the following readout; Grade 3 > 80% positive, Grade 2 > 40–80% positive, Grade 1 = 1–40%.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Western Blot Analysis of DNA Damage Signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Whole cell protein extracts were prepared according to Laemmli (1970 (link)). The primary antibodies used were: anti-ATM (1:500), anti-phospho-ATM Ser1981 (1:500), anti-p300 (1:500) (Abcam, Cambridge, UK), anti-GAPDH (1:50000) (Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany); anti-p21WAF1/Cip1 (1:500) (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA); anti-p53 (1:500), (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, USA); anti-ATR (1:500), anti-phospho-ATR Ser428 (1:500), anti-phospho-p53 Ser15 (1:250), anti-acetyl-p53 Lys382 (1:200), anti-SIRT1 (1:250), anti-phospho-SIRT1 Ser47 (1:250), anti-p38 MAPK (1:500), anti-phospho-p38 MAPK Thr180/Tyr182 (1:500), anti-phospho-MAPKAPK-2 Thr334 (1:500), anti-AMPKα (1:500), anti-phospho-AMPKα Thr172 (1:1000), anti-ACC (1:500), anti-phospho-ACC Ser79 (1:1000), anti-mTOR (1:500), anti-phospho-mTOR Ser2448 (1:500), anti-phospho-S6 Ser235/236 (1:1000) (Cell Signaling Technology, Denvers, USA), anti-Rb (1:250) (NeoMarkers, Fremont, USA). The respective proteins were detected after incubation with one of the horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:2000) (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), using an ECL system (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Western Blot Analysis of AKT and S6 Signaling

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Samples were electrophoresed on 11% SDS polyacrylamide gels and transferred to polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany). The membranes were incubated in 5% bovine serum albumin in Tris-buffered saline containing Tween-20 (50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, and 0.03% Tween-20) and then incubated with primary antibodies anti-pan-AKT, anti-phospho-AKT (Ser473), anti-phospho-AKT (Thr308), anti-pan-S6, anti-phospho-S6 (Ser235/236) (Cell Signaling Technologies, Danvers, MA, USA), and anti-α-tubulin (Sigma-Aldrich), followed by incubation with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody. Immunoreactive proteins were visualized with Western Lightning Plus-ECL (PerkinElmer, MA, USA). Densitometric measurement of bands on western blotting was performed using ImageJ software (US National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Evaluating FFPE Sections via Immunofluorescence

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Freshly cut FFPE sections were evaluated by immunofluorescent staining, as previously described.6 (link) The following primary antibodies were used: anti-GRP78 (C-20; Santa Cruz Biotechnology; 1:50), anti-phospho-AKT (Ser473) (D9E XP; Cell Signaling Technology; 1:50), anti-phospho-S6 (Ser235/236, Cell Signaling; 1:100), and anti-S6 (Cell Signaling; 1:100). DAPI was used for nuclear staining. Immunofluorescence was analyzed by Zeiss LSM 510 confocal microscope with LSM 510 Version 4.2 SP1 acquisition software. Confocal images were acquired with 40X and 100X oil lens, and processed with LSM Image Browser R4.2 and Adobe Photoshop CS5.
Apoptosis was measured using the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) fluorescent kit (Promega, Madison, WI) on FFPE sections, according to manufacturer’s instructions, as previously described.44 (link) The percentage of TUNEL-positive cells was determined using ImageJ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Pharmacodynamic Biomarker Analysis Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Platelet-rich plasma was obtained from patients pre-dose, and at 1, 3, 8, 24 hours post-dose on days 1 and 15 of cycle 1 for analysis of phospho-AKT (Ser473) using an electrochemiluminescense assay (Luminex xMAP, Luminex Corp, Austin, TX). Wherever feasible, patients underwent tumor biopsies pre-treatment and 1-4 hours post-dose on day 15; samples were fixed, sectioned and stained with haematoxylin and eosin, and for phospho-S6 using anti-phospho-S6 (Ser235/236) (Cell Signaling Technology Inc., Beverly, MA), or anti-phospho-AKT (Serine 473) clone D9E (Cell Signaling Technology). Plasma was obtained pre-dose and at 1 hour post-dose on cycle 1 day 1 for analysis of glucose and insulin levels at dose levels ≥100mg. Whole body 18F-FDG-PET scans were performed at baseline, 1-4 hours post-dose between day 22 and the end of cycle 1 as well as between day 50 and the end of cycle 2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
7

Immunofluorescence Analysis of mTOR Pathway

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunofluorescence analysis, NPCs were plated on chamber slides (Lab-Tek) or differentiated into neurons on poly-L-ornithine/laminin-coated glass-bottom culture dishes (MatTek). Cells were fixed in 4% (vol/vol) paraformaldehyde for 15 min followed by blocking in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 8% fetal bovine serum (vol/vol) for 1 h. The primary antibodies were prepared in PBS solution with 2 mg/ml saponin and incubated for 2 h at room temperature or overnight at 4°C. The cells were then washed in PBS and incubated with the corresponding fluorochrome-conjugated secondary antibodies for 1 h. Vectashield mounting medium plus DAPI (Vector Laboratories) was applied to label the nuclei. The following primary antibodies were used: anti-mTOR (Cell Signaling Technology, 2972) 1:100; anti-phospho-mTOR-Ser2448 (Cell Signaling Technology, 5536) 1:100; anti-S6 Ribosomal Protein (Cell Signaling Technology, 2217) 1: 200; anti-phosphoS6-Ser235/236 (Cell Signaling Technology, 2211) 1:100; anti-phospho-4EBP1-Thr37/46 (Cell Signaling Technology, 2855) 1:100; anti-LAMP1 (Developmental Studies Hybridoma Bank, H4A3) 1:200; anti-p62 (BD Biosciences, 610832) 1:100; anti-Tuj1 (Neuromics, MO15013) 1:200; anti-TFEB (MyBioSource, MBS855552) 1:50. The secondary antibodies used were Alexa fluor 488- or 594-conjugated mouse or rabbit (Life Technologies), both at a 1:200 or 1:400 dilution.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
8

Immunofluorescence Staining Protocol for mTOR Pathway

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunofluorescence staining, specimens were fixed in PBS with 4% formaldehyde, washed twice with PBS, and immersed in 0.1% Triton X-100 overnight at 4 °C, followed by washing 3 times with PBS. The following primary antibodies were incubated overnight at 4 °C: anti-phospho-mTOR (Ser2448) (1:200, Bioworld), anti-cleaved caspase-3 (1:200, Epitomics), anti-fibronectin (1:200, Santa Cruz) anti-phospho-ULK1 (ser757) (1:1000, Cell Signaling), anti-phospho-S6 (Ser235/236) (1:200, Cell Signaling) or anti-LC3A (1:50, Cell Signaling). After incubation with primary antibodies, cells were washed with PBS and then incubated with fluorescence-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:5000, FITC, Jackson ImmunoResearch, Westgrove, PA) for 2 hr at room temperature. After nuclear staining with 40,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI, D9542, Sigma-Aldrich), spheres were then placed in a Lab-Tek®II chamber (Nunc, Naperville, IL) and analyzed with a confocal fluorescent microscope (Olympus FV10i). Negative controls without utilizing primary antibodies were also prepared to rule out nonspecific labeling.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
9

Protein Extraction and Immunoblot Analysis of Organoids

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Organoids were collected using a cell recovery solution (Corning) and washed with PBS, and proteins were extracted using 1% NP‐40 buffer (20 mmol/L Tris‐HCl, pH 8.0, 137 mmol/L NaCl, 1% NP‐40, 10% glycerol). The protein concentrations were determined using a protein assay (Bio‐Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), and equal amounts of protein were resolved, transferred to nitrocellulose membranes and detected as previously described.11 The antibodies used for the immunoblot analysis were as follows: anti‐STAT1(D1K9Y, Cell Signaling), anti‐phosphoSTAT1 (Ser727) (D3B7, Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA), anti‐phosphoSTAT1 (Tyr701) (58D6, Cell Signaling), anti‐ERK (137F5, Cell Signaling), anti‐phosphoERK (Thr202/Tyr204) (D13.14.4E, Cell Signaling), anti‐S6 (5G10, Cell Signaling), anti‐phosphoS6 (Ser235/236) (D57.2.2E, Cell Signaling), and anti‐actin (AC‐15, Sigma‐Aldrich).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
10

Evaluating FFPE Sections via Immunofluorescence

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Freshly cut FFPE sections were evaluated by immunofluorescent staining, as previously described.6 (link) The following primary antibodies were used: anti-GRP78 (C-20; Santa Cruz Biotechnology; 1:50), anti-phospho-AKT (Ser473) (D9E XP; Cell Signaling Technology; 1:50), anti-phospho-S6 (Ser235/236, Cell Signaling; 1:100), and anti-S6 (Cell Signaling; 1:100). DAPI was used for nuclear staining. Immunofluorescence was analyzed by Zeiss LSM 510 confocal microscope with LSM 510 Version 4.2 SP1 acquisition software. Confocal images were acquired with 40X and 100X oil lens, and processed with LSM Image Browser R4.2 and Adobe Photoshop CS5.
Apoptosis was measured using the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) fluorescent kit (Promega, Madison, WI) on FFPE sections, according to manufacturer’s instructions, as previously described.44 (link) The percentage of TUNEL-positive cells was determined using ImageJ.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!