The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Brilliance big bore

Manufactured by Siemens
Sourced in Germany

The Brilliance Big Bore is a medical imaging device designed for diagnostic and treatment planning applications. It features a large patient aperture to accommodate a wide range of body sizes and clinical requirements. The core function of the Brilliance Big Bore is to capture high-quality images for medical professionals to analyze and diagnose patient conditions.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

4 protocols using brilliance big bore

1

Microwave Ablation Guided by Repeated CT Scans

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
All procedures were performed by the same interventional radiologists (DJ and XH). The body position was determined according to the location of the tumor with the aim of puncture facilitation. A 64-row CT (Brilliance Big Bore, Siemens, Germany) scan was carried out to localize the tumor in the axial CT image with a thickness of 3 mm (parameter: voltage 120 kV, current 90 mA). The puncture route was mapped to avoid pulmonary bullae, severe emphysema, crossing interlobar fissures, and so on. Under the repeated cCT scan, the microwave applicator was gradually inserted into the tumor until an active tip puncture was performed throughout the whole tumor (step-by-step strategy) according to the operator’s experience. The ablation parameters were the same as those described in the C-arm CT group. For tumors larger than 3 cm, 2 puncture needles could be used simultaneously, or repeated adjustment of the puncture may have been needed using a single microwave applicator. The post-ablation image standards were the same as those in the C-arm CT group.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Ventilation Mapping for NSCLC Radiotherapy

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Eleven patients that received conventional thoracic RT for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) at Duke University Medical Center were included in this IRB-approved study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02478255). Prescription doses ranged from 50–66 Gy in 25–33 fractions, at 2 Gy per fraction (see Appendix B). Patients were simulated on either a Philips Brilliance Big Bore or a Siemens Biograph40, during which a free-breathing CT scan was acquired for treatment planning, reconstructed with 1×1×3 mm voxels. After CT simulation, and prior to the first fraction of RT, patients underwent a 129Xe MRI to map the regional ventilation and gas exchange properties of their lungs, as described herein. There was a median time of 3 days between the CT simulation and the 129Xe MRI (range 0–11 days; average 4.3 days), and a median time of 2 days between the 129Xe MRI and the first fraction of RT (range 0–7 days; average 3.0 days).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

Tumor Ablation via Caudal-Cranial Puncture

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
In the cCT group, the puncture was done without the use of a navigation tool. The same interventional radiologists mentioned above performed all the punctures. A 64-row CT scan was performed to localize the tumor in the axial CT image (Brilliance Big Bore, Siemens, Germany) with a current of 200 mA, a voltage of 120 kV, and a thickness of 3 mm. The basic principle of the puncture is to avoid damage to the diaphragm, lung tissue, and the ribs to the maximum possible extent. Based on the operator’s experience, all puncture routes would travel from the caudal to the cranial side, with the center of the tumor as the puncture target. Because the axial image showed no full view of the oblique puncture applicator, the puncture was performed using a step-by-step strategy until the microwave applicator reached the center of the tumor. The ablation parameters in the cCT group were the same as those described for the CBCT group.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Retrospective Study of Radiation Therapy Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Between January 2022 and May 2022, a cohort of additional 50 treated plans with different tumor stages and prescribed doses were randomly and retrospectively selected. All patients were staged according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Manual for Staging of Cancer, 8th edition. Patients had previously been scanned using either a Philips Brilliance Big Bore or Siemens Syngo CT scanner. These CT images were transferred to the Pinnacle 3 TPS (version 16.2, Philips Medical Systems, Fitchburg, WI). The targets were then manually delineated by the radiation oncologist on these CT images with the help of a contrast-enhanced diagnostic CT. Generally, Clinical Target Volume (CTV) was expanded by 5mm from Gross Target Volume (GTV) and PTV was expanded by 5mm from CTV. If Planning Gross Target Volume (PGTV) needed to be delineated, a 5 mm margin between the PTV and PGTV were considered, though these margins could have been subjected to adaptations for each specific clinical case. The OARs included lung, heart, cord, cord PRV, trachea, esophagus, liver and so on. The dose constraint applied for planning are provided in Supplementary Material 2.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!