The largest database of trusted experimental protocols

Monoclonal anti v5

Manufactured by Thermo Fisher Scientific
Sourced in United States, France

Monoclonal anti-V5 is a laboratory reagent used for the detection and purification of proteins tagged with the V5 epitope. It is a mouse-derived monoclonal antibody that specifically binds to the V5 peptide sequence, allowing for the identification and isolation of V5-tagged recombinant proteins.

Automatically generated - may contain errors

6 protocols using monoclonal anti v5

1

Metalloporphyrin and Protoporphyrin IX Protocols

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Metalloporphyrins and protoporphyrin IX (Santa Cruz biotechnology) were dissolved in DMSO and stored in the dark. Chemicals were purchased from Sigma Aldrich except HEMIN (MP Biomedicals), rosmarinic acid (Cayman Chemical) and CCCP (Santa Cruz Biotech). All antibodies were purchased from Cell Signaling Technology except monoclonal anti-HtrA1 and polyclonal anti-HtrA2 (R&D Systems), rabbit polyclonal anti-Fibulin-5 (Millipore), monoclonal anti-V5 (Invitrogen), and rabbit polyclonal anti-HtrA1 (kind gift from Dr. Sascha Fauser, University of Cologne [4] (link)).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
2

Age-Dependent STEP Expression in Rats

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Male Sprague-Dawley rats (1, 4 and 18–20 month) were obtained from Harlan Laboratories (Livermore, CA, USA). Antibodies used were as follows: monoclonal anti-STEP from Novus Biologicals (Littleton, CO, USA), monoclonal anti-V5 from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, CA, USA), polyclonal PSD-95 from Cell Signaling, monoclonal anti-cMyc and polyclonal Calnexin from Santa Cruz (Santa Cruz, CA, USA), monoclonal anti-β-tubulin and polyclonal synaptophysin from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA). All secondary antibodies were from Cell Signaling. Protein G Sepharose was from GE Healthcare. N-acetyl cysteine (NAC), Diethylmaleate (DEM) and para-nitrophenylphosphate (pNPP) were from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). GSH assay kit was from Arbor assays (Ann Arbor, MI, USA). All tissue culture reagents were obtained from Invitrogen. Approval for animal experiments was given by the University of New Mexico, Health Sciences Center, Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
3

SDS-PAGE and Western Blotting Protocol

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
SDS‐PAGE and Western blotting were performed by established procedures. Primary antibodies used were monoclonal anti‐EGFP (Clontech, Saint‐Germain‐en‐Laye, France) and monoclonal anti‐V5 (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturers' instruction. The filter trap binding assay was performed as described previously (Carra et al., 2005).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
4

Immunofluorescence Microscopy of Trypanosomes

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
For immunofluorescence 1 × 108 of BF trypanosomes were washed with PBS supplemented with 10 g/l glucose, and spread onto slides coated with polylysine (100 μg/ml; Sigma). The cells were fixed with 3.7% formaldehyde in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), washed with PBS, and permeabilized with 0.1% triton X-100 in PBS. The cells were then washed with 1xPBS-T (0.05% Tween). After blocking with 5.5% FBS, the respective slides were incubated for 1 hr in PBS-T plus 3% BSA with the following primary antibodies: monoclonal anti-v5 (1:200, Invitrogen), anti-enolase (1:400, [36 (link)]) and anti-hexokinase (1:400, a gift from Paul Michels). After washes, the slides were incubated in the dark for 1 hr with the following secondary antibodies: goat anti-rabbit IgG (H + L) Texas Red conjugate (1:400, Life Technologies) or goat anti-mouse IgG (H + L) FITC conjugate (1:400, Sigma). The slides were washed and mounted in Vectashield containing 1.5 μg/ml DAPI (Life Technologies).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
5

Western Blot for Protein Expression Analysis

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
Expression of the target protein was compared between uninduced and induced RNAi cell cultures using cell lysates corresponding to 5 x 106 cells per lane. Lysates were prepared in NuPAGE® LDS sample buffer (Invitrogen), separated on Bolt 4–12% Bis-Tris polyacrylamide gels (Invitrogen) and transferred to an Amersham Hybond P PVDF membrane (GE Healthcare) for probing with the respective antibodies. Rat anti-alpha MPP, and rabbit anti-MIP were used at dilutions 1:1,000, 1:1,000 and 1:5,000, respectively. Polyclonal anti-enolase [48 (link)] and anti-trCOIV antibodies [49 (link)] were used at dilutions 1:50,000 and 1:10,000, respectively. Monoclonal anti-mtHsp70 was used at a dilution of 1:5000. Monoclonal anti-V5 (Invitrogen), polyclonal anti-GFP (Life Technologies) and monoclonal anti-tubulin antibodies (Sigma-Aldrich) were used at dilutions 1:2,500, 1:2,000 and 1:5000, respectively. Secondary antibodies were conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (Sigma-Aldrich), and the signal was visualized using Clarity Western ECL Blotting Substrate (Bio-Rad).
+ Open protocol
+ Expand
6

Recombinant Protein Expression and Glycosylation Modulation

Check if the same lab product or an alternative is used in the 5 most similar protocols
The recombinant proteins were expressed in SHuffle T7 Express Competent E. coli (NEB) and purified using HisTrap from GE Healthcare, followed by size exclusion chromatography. Purified CSA, HS, and chondroitinase ABC were obtained from Sigma. CSC was obtained from Seikagaku, and Monoclonal anti-V5 and anti-V5-FITC antibodies were obtained from Invitrogen. Cells were transfected with siRNAs (QIAGEN) (10 nM final) against B3GAT1, CSGALNACT1, CHST11, CHST3, or ARSN using RNAiMAX (Invitrogen) and analyzed for rVAR2 binding by flow cytometry and for mRNA expression by RT-PCR.
+ Open protocol
+ Expand

About PubCompare

Our mission is to provide scientists with the largest repository of trustworthy protocols and intelligent analytical tools, thereby offering them extensive information to design robust protocols aimed at minimizing the risk of failures.

We believe that the most crucial aspect is to grant scientists access to a wide range of reliable sources and new useful tools that surpass human capabilities.

However, we trust in allowing scientists to determine how to construct their own protocols based on this information, as they are the experts in their field.

Ready to get started?

Sign up for free.
Registration takes 20 seconds.
Available from any computer
No download required

Sign up now

Revolutionizing how scientists
search and build protocols!